accuracy in time of birth

April 18, 2003

I have a question to ask to all experts of this group. Today we utilize sub and

sub-sub lords of cusps in nearly all predictions based on KP System.

We all know that there is no consensus on ayanamsa, no consensus on true rahu

and mean rahu, known variations of computer programs, unsteady motion of

planets, unavailability of atomic clocks at hospitals/homes etc., is it OK to

use sub-sub (cuspal sub-sub lords change in average of 25 seconds) lord or even

sub lord (cuspal sub lords changes in average of 4 minuts)???

I think it is a basic question and good subject to debate. At least lots of

people in India don't have accurate timing with them (accuracy less than 4

minutes).

Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Punit Pandey

The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

April 18, 2003

hare rama krishna

dear punit

the group discusses vedic astrology. the name of the group is written

in bold letters. i hope you understand

regards

partha

vedic astrology, Punit Pandey

<punitastrologer> wrote:

>

> Hello All KP Experts,

>

> I have a question to ask to all experts of this group. Today we

utilize sub and sub-sub lords of cusps in nearly all predictions

based on KP System.

>

> We all know that there is no consensus on ayanamsa, no consensus on

true rahu and mean rahu, known variations of computer programs,

unsteady motion of planets, unavailability of atomic clocks at

hospitals/homes etc., is it OK to use sub-sub (cuspal sub-sub lords

change in average of 25 seconds) lord or even sub lord (cuspal sub

lords changes in average of 4 minuts)???

>

> I think it is a basic question and good subject to debate. At least

lots of people in India don't have accurate timing with them

(accuracy less than 4 minutes).

>

> Thanks in advance.

>

> Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

> The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

April 18, 2003

Sorry for mistake. I used to think that Jaimini, Tajik, Hora, Nadi, Bhrigu, KP,

Lal Kitab etc. all belong to vedic astrology. Probably some are not as vedic.

Seeking experts' comments.

Punit Pandey"V.partha sarathy" <partvinu5 > wrote:

hare rama krishnadear punitthe group discusses vedic astrology. the name of the

group is written in bold letters. i hope you understandregardspartha--- In

vedic astrology, Punit Pandey <punitastrologer> wrote:> >

Hello All KP Experts,> > I have a question to ask to all experts of this group.

Today we utilize sub and sub-sub lords of cusps in nearly all predictions based

on KP System. > > We all know that there is no consensus on ayanamsa, no

consensus on true rahu and mean rahu, known variations of computer programs,

unsteady motion of planets, unavailability of atomic clocks at hospitals/homes

etc., is it OK to use sub-sub (cuspal sub-sub lords change in average of 25

seconds) lord or even sub lord (cuspal sub lords changes in average of 4

minuts)???> > I think it is a basic question and good subject to debate. At

least lots of people in India don't have accurate timing with them (accuracy

less than 4 minutes).> > Thanks in advance.> > Regards,> > Punit Pandey > > > >

> > The New Search -

Faster. Easier. Bingo.Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Do you

?

The New Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.

April 18, 2003

Hare Rama Krishna

-----------------------

Dear Punit,

It is all vedic astrology, however even within vedic astrology, the Jyotishis

have a mind of their own. Those who follow Parasari strictly understand that

the nodes must always be mean, and not true, to fulfill the duty assigned to

them, hence by implication of this, one uses mean nodes. But yet some people do

not follow this.

As for ayanamsa, the reason for lack of consensus is lack of valid research.

Some oppine an ayanamsa that is more than 10 degrees from lahiri, but i can

assure you that their basis for their readings is much different from that

taught by parasara.. mainly because those natives don't read scriptures to

begin with, and make up their own rules along the way! This is not Jyotish the

way Parasara wanted it to be.

Krishnamurty created the KP system on a similar basis.. namely that noone would teach him Jyotish!

Tajik is incorperated into the systems we know today and is no doubt an

interesting system of astrology, but i won't comment.

Bhrigu-Jyotish is Nadi-Jyotish and Nadi-Jyotish is the same Jyotish that

Parasara taught.. have no doubt about that.

Now to adress your question on acuracy.

Once an astrologer gets a birth chart, his/her prime objective is to confirm its

acuracy. So the question of birthtime acuracy is simply not relevant, as usually

the Astrologer is out to prove its acuracy to begin with.

When the astrologer has done so, the readings may flow like nectar, so the

question is Birth-time rectification.

Hope this helps.

Best wishesVisti---Sri Jagannath Center: http://.orgBhagavad Purana:

http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgiTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

-

Punit Pandey

vedic astrology

Friday, April 18, 2003 1:16 PM

Re: [vedic astrology] Re: accuracy in time of birth

Dear Mr. Partha,