Guest guest Posted March 16, 2003 Report Share Posted March 16, 2003 Hello All, I think I will conclude this debate before people on this list get a death warrant against me!!! I liked Mr. Dasgupta's and Mr. Rath's comments amidst this raised dust though they are not fully acceptable to me. Rest of the people have only threatened. While this discussion was going on I resorted to my favorite commentry on Gita by Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak. I am confident that the people on this list, except those like Gaurang Das, should not have doubts over scholarship of Lokmanya Tilak. Though I havent read Gita Rahasya completly I browsed through the relevant section again. What Tilak has argued and it is perfectly acceptable for me atleast today ( I dont know about tomorrow). Tilak highlights that it was important to resolve the Arjun's dilemma whether to fight or not to fight. At the core level it is a conflict of Pravritti and Nivritti (action and no-action) because of the possible results of action. Now performing duties and actions in the larger interest or goals is recommended by dharma. And when we are doing something in larger interest we should not bother what is the result... Now the issue of 'efficiency' of Karma and intrestingly Tilak doesnt say anything about it. But I suddenly realised while reading Tilak's commentry the possible reasons why Krishna did not talk about efficiency of Karma a. Arjuna himself was a skilled warrior and hence efficient kshatriya which is evident from his earlier achievements b. It was more important for Krishna to make him fight, i.e., to choose action rather than non-action in the given context and hence it was not important to highlight the issue of efficiency just before war. Now all the pieces of jigsaw puzzle fall in their place. The application scenario of the most disputed and misunderstood verse is IF there is dilemma FOR a 'skilled' agent/actor THEN result is least important WHEN one performs IN the larger interest/goal. Moral of the story is Karma Yoga is not for ordinary people... ha ha ha ha ha... and Mr. Moderator I hope you will be kind to me hereafter. Rajeev Upadhye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2003 Report Share Posted March 17, 2003 dear rajeev, Geeta starts from "Vishaada Yoga" of arjun. unless this yoga starts we do not become fit to have the real knowledge. we must remove all the junks..impressions in our mind to let the fresh knowledge come in..we must have the humbleness to sit before guru and understand him.. and that is the only right approach to Geeta. questions and answers are must for the right understanding ... and that is the culture of the vedic era and indian scriptures. you will see that all scriptures are written in question and answer form. but definitely question and answers does not mean unhealthy critisising .. that one must understand. skill or physical work are not the only factor for becoming a karma yogi ... then the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) would have been the greatest karma yogi. there are much more to it. try to get the comentry on Geeta by Swami Chinmayananda. the comentries are easy to understand and easily drives the points in home. regards dasgupta - Rajeev Upadhye Vedic Astrology Cc: j.k. dasgupta ; Chandrashekhar ; Sanjay Rath ; pvr108 Monday, March 17, 2003 12:32 PM [vedic astrology] Efficiency of Karma: Summary and Concluding Remarks Hello All,I think I will conclude this debate before people on this list get a deathwarrant against me!!!I liked Mr. Dasgupta's and Mr. Rath's comments amidst this raised dustthough they are not fully acceptable to me. Rest of the people have onlythreatened.While this discussion was going on I resorted to my favorite commentry onGita by Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak. I am confident that the people on thislist, except those like Gaurang Das, should not have doubts over scholarshipof Lokmanya Tilak. Though I havent read Gita Rahasya completly I browsedthrough the relevant section again.What Tilak has argued and it is perfectly acceptable for me atleast today( I dont know about tomorrow). Tilak highlights that it was important toresolve the Arjun's dilemma whether to fight or not to fight. At the corelevel it is a conflict of Pravritti and Nivritti (action and no-action)because of the possible results of action. Now performing duties and actionsin the larger interest or goals is recommended by dharma. And when we aredoing something in larger interest we should not bother what is theresult...Now the issue of 'efficiency' of Karma and intrestingly Tilak doesnt sayanything about it. But I suddenly realised while reading Tilak's commentrythe possible reasons why Krishna did not talk about efficiency of Karma a.Arjuna himself was a skilled warrior and hence efficient kshatriya which isevident from his earlier achievements b. It was more important for Krishnato make him fight, i.e., to choose action rather than non-action in thegiven context and hence it was not important to highlight the issue ofefficiency just before war.Now all the pieces of jigsaw puzzle fall in their place. The applicationscenario of the most disputed and misunderstood verse is IF there is dilemmaFOR a 'skilled' agent/actor THEN result is least important WHEN one performsIN the larger interest/goal.Moral of the story is Karma Yoga is not for ordinary people... ha ha ha haha... and Mr. Moderator I hope you will be kind to me hereafter.Rajeev UpadhyeArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2003 Report Share Posted March 17, 2003 Referring to your statement "skill or physical work are not the only factor for becoming a karma yogi ... then the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) would have been the greatest karma yogi. there are much more to it." "j.k. dasgupta" <dgasso (AT) vsnl (DOT) com> wrote: I would like to add that if the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) does his work wholeheartedly offering his labour to God, thinking that he is working for God, then this hard work will purify his mind which is the result of Karma yoga. Regards, Sadashiv. dear rajeev, Geeta starts from "Vishaada Yoga" of arjun. unless this yoga starts we do not become fit to have the real knowledge. we must remove all the junks..impressions in our mind to let the fresh knowledge come in..we must have the humbleness to sit before guru and understand him.. and that is the only right approach to Geeta. questions and answers are must for the right understanding ... and that is the culture of the vedic era and indian scriptures. you will see that all scriptures are written in question and answer form. but definitely question and answers does not mean unhealthy critisising .. that one must understand. skill or physical work are not the only factor for becoming a karma yogi ... then the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) would have been the greatest karma yogi. there are much more to it. try to get the comentry on Geeta by Swami Chinmayananda. the comentries are easy to understand and easily drives the points in home. regards dasgupta - Rajeev Upadhye Vedic Astrology Cc: j.k. dasgupta ; Chandrashekhar ; Sanjay Rath ; pvr108 Monday, March 17, 2003 12:32 PM [vedic astrology] Efficiency of Karma: Summary and Concluding Remarks Hello All,I think I will conclude this debate before people on this list get a deathwarrant against me!!!I liked Mr. Dasgupta's and Mr. Rath's comments amidst this raised dustthough they are not fully acceptable to me. Rest of the people have onlythreatened.While this discussion was going on I resorted to my favorite commentry onGita by Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak. I am confident that the people on thislist, except those like Gaurang Das, should not have doubts over scholarshipof Lokmanya Tilak. Though I havent read Gita Rahasya completly I browsedthrough the relevant section again.What Tilak has argued and it is perfectly acceptable for me atleast today( I dont know about tomorrow). Tilak highlights that it was important toresolve the Arjun's dilemma whether to fight or not to fight. At the corelevel it is a conflict of Pravritti and Nivritti (action and no-action)because of the possible results of action. Now performing duties and actionsin the larger interest or goals is recommended by dharma. And when we aredoing something in larger interest we should not bother what is theresult...Now the issue of 'efficiency' of Karma and intrestingly Tilak doesnt sayanything about it. But I suddenly realised while reading Tilak's commentrythe possible reasons why Krishna did not talk about efficiency of Karma a.Arjuna himself was a skilled warrior and hence efficient kshatriya which isevident from his earlier achievements b. It was more important for Krishnato make him fight, i.e., to choose action rather than non-action in thegiven context and hence it was not important to highlight the issue ofefficiency just before war.Now all the pieces of jigsaw puzzle fall in their place. The applicationscenario of the most disputed and misunderstood verse is IF there is dilemmaFOR a 'skilled' agent/actor THEN result is least important WHEN one performsIN the larger interest/goal.Moral of the story is Karma Yoga is not for ordinary people... ha ha ha haha... and Mr. Moderator I hope you will be kind to me hereafter.Rajeev UpadhyeArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Do you ? Web Hosting - establish your business online Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2003 Report Share Posted March 17, 2003 dear sadashiv, in my understanding.. karmayoga is performing action without attachment or any idea of result to the self. which is very difficult and lot of consious efforts have to be there. much easier to say than perform. also..this will never come without gyana yoga and bhakti yoga. in other words gyana yoga..karma yoga and bhakti yoga has to go simustanoiusly. it is first working without self (lower "I") and then lastly working with self (higher "I") only.. then only mokhsa will come. regards dasgupta - Sadashiv Dharwarkar vedic astrology Monday, March 17, 2003 8:28 PM Re: [vedic astrology] Efficiency of Karma: Summary and Concluding Remarks Dear Dasguptaji, Referring to your statement "skill or physical work are not the only factor for becoming a karma yogi ... then the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) would have been the greatest karma yogi. there are much more to it." "j.k. dasgupta" <dgasso (AT) vsnl (DOT) com> wrote: I would like to add that if the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) does his work wholeheartedly offering his labour to God, thinking that he is working for God, then this hard work will purify his mind which is the result of Karma yoga. Regards, Sadashiv. dear rajeev, Geeta starts from "Vishaada Yoga" of arjun. unless this yoga starts we do not become fit to have the real knowledge. we must remove all the junks..impressions in our mind to let the fresh knowledge come in..we must have the humbleness to sit before guru and understand him.. and that is the only right approach to Geeta. questions and answers are must for the right understanding ... and that is the culture of the vedic era and indian scriptures. you will see that all scriptures are written in question and answer form. but definitely question and answers does not mean unhealthy critisising .. that one must understand. skill or physical work are not the only factor for becoming a karma yogi ... then the plumber (with his high skill) or ricksaw puller (with his hard physical work) would have been the greatest karma yogi. there are much more to it. try to get the comentry on Geeta by Swami Chinmayananda. the comentries are easy to understand and easily drives the points in home. regards dasgupta - Rajeev Upadhye Vedic Astrology Cc: j.k. dasgupta ; Chandrashekhar ; Sanjay Rath ; pvr108 Monday, March 17, 2003 12:32 PM [vedic astrology] Efficiency of Karma: Summary and Concluding Remarks Hello All,I think I will conclude this debate before people on this list get a deathwarrant against me!!!I liked Mr. Dasgupta's and Mr. Rath's comments amidst this raised dustthough they are not fully acceptable to me. Rest of the people have onlythreatened.While this discussion was going on I resorted to my favorite commentry onGita by Lokmanya Bal Gangadhar Tilak. I am confident that the people on thislist, except those like Gaurang Das, should not have doubts over scholarshipof Lokmanya Tilak. Though I havent read Gita Rahasya completly I browsedthrough the relevant section again.What Tilak has argued and it is perfectly acceptable for me atleast today( I dont know about tomorrow). Tilak highlights that it was important toresolve the Arjun's dilemma whether to fight or not to fight. At the corelevel it is a conflict of Pravritti and Nivritti (action and no-action)because of the possible results of action. Now performing duties and actionsin the larger interest or goals is recommended by dharma. And when we aredoing something in larger interest we should not bother what is theresult...Now the issue of 'efficiency' of Karma and intrestingly Tilak doesnt sayanything about it. But I suddenly realised while reading Tilak's commentrythe possible reasons why Krishna did not talk about efficiency of Karma a.Arjuna himself was a skilled warrior and hence efficient kshatriya which isevident from his earlier achievements b. It was more important for Krishnato make him fight, i.e., to choose action rather than non-action in thegiven context and hence it was not important to highlight the issue ofefficiency just before war.Now all the pieces of jigsaw puzzle fall in their place. The applicationscenario of the most disputed and misunderstood verse is IF there is dilemmaFOR a 'skilled' agent/act or THEN result is least important WHEN one performsIN the larger interest/goal.Moral of the story is Karma Yoga is not for ordinary people... ha ha ha haha... and Mr. Moderator I hope you will be kind to me hereafter.Rajeev UpadhyeArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Web Hosting - establish your business online Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.