for Buwa

[Guest guest]

Om Gurave namah

Dear Sailesh

One small point. Although Buddha sounds like Buddhi, Buddhi or Dhi is

ruled by Juptier and not Mercury.

Regards

Sanjay Rath

At 05:28 PM 14-03-03 -0800, you wrote:

Dear Ramanarayan:

Namaste!

Some very interesting points made below, regarding where the deep roots

of mantras really prevail..plus how "false" intellect blocks

our experience of sat-chit-anand...i would like to add that the same

intellect when purified has the potential of conferring

enlightenment..maybe that's why Jupiter ( the "Buddhibhutam,

Trilokesham" ) decided to accept his son Mercury (the more refined

and complicated "Buddhi", the more analytical one borne out of

the genes of his "father") after realizing his potential to

reach the abyss of bliss...as also described by Bepin Bihari in his

"intro to esoteric astrology".....

Hari Om,

Shailesh

[Guest guest]

Namaste! Some very interesting points made below, regarding where the deep roots

of mantras really prevail..plus how "false" intellect blocks our experience of

sat-chit-anand...i would like to add that the same intellect when purified has

the potential of conferring enlightenment..maybe that's why Jupiter ( the

"Buddhibhutam, Trilokesham" ) decided to accept his son Mercury (the more

refined and complicated "Buddhi", the more analytical one borne out of the

genes of his "father") after realizing his potential to reach the abyss of

bliss...as also described by Bepin Bihari in his "intro to esoteric

astrology".....

Hari Om,

Shailesh

"P.S. RAMANARAYANAN" <p_s_ramanarayanan (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

vedic astrologyFrom: "P.S. RAMANARAYANAN" Fri, 14 Mar

2003 22:46:02 +0530Re: [vedic astrology] Recommending demigod worship

(Re: Question to devote-as...

SARVAM GYANANDAMAYAM JAGAT

AUM GURUBYO NAMAH

Dear Jeff,Gordon,Narasimha and others,

My humble submission.

Jeff had stated in his last email that in the word 'faith' truth lies in

subjective beliefs and that astrology must go beyond faith and survive

reasoning.

In India Astrology is called as jyotish vidya. Jyotish means towards jyothi

meaning enlightenment. You might be aware from the Kalapurusha

Jatakha(horoscope of time personified - Aries as Ascendant) that where venus is

exalted Mercury is debilitated. You will understand that this venus is the lord

of 2nd and 7th house. What does this mean? A person who can raise above the

limits/bondage of kutumbha and carnal pleasures can expand through the medium

of love to the level of embracing the universe. In front of such

Mahaanubhavas/realised souls there is no scope for separate existence of

reasoning faculty/intellctual capabaility represented by Mercury. In other

words there is no trace of ego in such states. If there is a urge to know the

roots of the intellect/reasoning faculty can the intellect help?!

Let me go further. Atman+ imprints(intellect+mind)+sharira(body) in totality

speaks about the life of an individual.If you want to know the nature of Atman

can the intellect help? What jyotish vidya does is to help the

native/individual in transcending the boundaries of imprints. This can be

further simplified. Silence + Sound(nisabdha+sabdha) are the two major concepts

of life. Silence is called as Atman. Sound can be further divided. Vaikhari,

madhyama, pashyanti, Para. Vaikhari to pashyanthi are various levels of sounds

while Para state is nothing but silence.

Everybody knows that sounds and figures are interrelated. This is technically

called as Namaroopa.Nama is nothing but sound/imprints(region of intellect &

mind) while Roopa refers to Sharira. The nature of Atman is

Sat-chit-ananda/truth-knowledge and bliss.

Jyotish vidya teaches that the entire Zodiac is full of sounds(108 in all).

There are 28 nakshatra mandalas(including Abhijit). Each nakshatra comprises

of four padas/charanas which is verily related to particular type of sound.

Combination of various sounds results in various Roopas/Shariras. We call it

technically as Mantras and Gods. The knowledge which helps in one getting out

of his disturbed mental state so as to facilitate the journey to progress

further is called as Mantrashastra. When the destination/goal isAtman what is

the use of sitting in the earlier stations?!

Without a complete knowledge of Mantrashastra and Jyotish

vidya(starbased/nirayana) let us not complain that astrology is not complete so

long as it fails to survive the test of reasoning.The root cause of all problems

is ego/"I". Self-enquiry/who-am-I can help a bit.Help can be sought from a

Guru. Guru means dispeller of darkness.

In the lotus feet of Satguru,

p.s.ramanarayanan.

>"Jeff"

>vedic astrology >vedic astrology

>[vedic astrology] Recommending demigod worship (Re: Question to

devote-as... >Fri, 14 Mar 2003 14:28:03 -0000 > >Gordon, > >I did not

intend to start a debate. But the Ayanamsa is still up for >grabs it seems.

Demigods are ideas spoken as truth, yet contain >flaws. In order to dispell

these characterations one must be sure the >truth is there. I suppose in the

word "faith" the truth lies in ones >subjective beliefs. But if astrology is to

advance, it must go beyond >faith in my opinion. It must survive reasoning. >

>Jeff > >vedic astrology, GWBrennan@a... wrote: > > Dear

Jeff > > I'm puzzled what you mean by 'flaws in the sidereal zodiac'. I can >see

flaws > > in an 'our dogma is the only valid one' type of astrology or in the

>idea that > > only astrologers in the past had real knowledge, but the

sidereal >or the > > tropical zodiac are surely both neutral in that respect.

'Sayana' >and > > 'Nirayana' i.e. tropical or sidereal zodiacs have different

>purposes. > > Nirayana is the basic astronomical system and Sayana has a

specific >annual > > purpose. If you use the Sayana system for all your

astrology then >you have a > > skewed view of a chart and a lot of basic

astrology will not work >on it. > > They can not really be equally compared. I

think that the problem >lies in > > what people believe astrology to be. From

my studies it is clear >to me that > > astrology was once considered as

science, in almost the same way as >today > > materialists think of modern

science as the only source of valid >knowledge. > > Astrology was the only

science in that sense. All knowledge was >there, but > > there was a great

skill and usually many years of devotion in >learing all of > > the rules to

interpret it and in becoming skilled in the art. >Today that > > real astrology

has become fragmented or partly lost. I had a quick >look at > > Hank Friedman's

site - very impressive and his information given >out on > > software is really

excellent - 6 years ago I went to a lecture he >gave on > > that and he was

good then. His site approaches astrological >descriptions by > > two methods -

one is simply descriptive and there is a lot of that - > fine you > > can

simply examine that and see if you agree or not and how it >compares with > >

what you have learnt of the signs, planets, etc. or as astudent you >can > >

easily learn from it. However it also uses astrology for the very >limited > >

purpose that popular astrology is used for today - i.e. to describe >and to > >

give form to the ego, which has no real existence anyway - well it >exists, > >

but it is never the same. People are totally emotionally attached >to their > >

egos and some astrology today seems to be used principally to >heighten their >

> easily manipulable sense of their own always changing and always >unreal ego,

> > to which end any untruth will serve perfectly. If it was 4003 AD >now and

not > > 2003 people might have woken up to the fact that western astrology

>(Sayana > > zodiac) is missing out on the real knowledge, as the western

zodiac >is moving > > away from the astronomical positions of planets and the

further it >goes the > > more unreal its methods will necessarily become. > > >

> Regards > > Gordon >

Cricket - World Cup 2003 News, Views and Match Reports. Archives:

vedic astrologyGroup info:

vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank

mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light

shine on us .......

Do you

?

Web Hosting - establish your business online

[Guest guest]

SARVAM GYANANANDAMAYAM JAGAT

AUM GURUBYO NAMAH

Dear Shailesh,

Namaste. Knowledge+realisation = Wisdom. Guru represents wisdom while Buda

represents knowledge/intellect. In Gurudwara(pisces)intellect has to bow

down ( budha is debilitated in pisces).

Best wishes,

 

in the feet of SATGURU GYANANANDA,

p.s.ramanarayanan.

 

 

>Shailesh Rana <astrorana

>vedic astrology

>vedic astrology

>CC: dhurbaluitel

>[vedic astrology] for Buwa

>Fri, 14 Mar 2003 17:28:56 -0800 (PST)

>

>

>Dear Ramanarayan:

>Namaste!

>Some very interesting points made below, regarding where the deep roots of

>mantras really prevail..plus how "false" intellect blocks our experience of

>sat-chit-anand...i would like to add that the same intellect when purified

>has the potential of conferring enlightenment..maybe that's why Jupiter (

>the "Buddhibhutam, Trilokesham" ) decided to accept his son Mercury (the

>more refined and complicated "Buddhi", the more analytical one borne out of

>the genes of his "father") after realizing his potential to reach the abyss

>of bliss...as also described by Bepin Bihari in his "intro to esoteric

>astrology".....

>Hari Om,

>Shailesh

> "P.S. RAMANARAYANAN" <p_s_ramanarayanan wrote:To:

>vedic astrology

>"P.S. RAMANARAYANAN"

>

>Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:46:02 +0530

>Re: [vedic astrology] Recommending demigod worship (Re: Question

>to devote-as...

>

>

>SARVAM GYANANDAMAYAM JAGAT

>

>AUM GURUBYO NAMAH

>

>Dear Jeff,Gordon,Narasimha and others,

>

>My humble submission.

>

>Jeff had stated in his last email that in the word 'faith' truth lies in

>subjective beliefs and that astrology must go beyond faith and survive

>reasoning.

>

>In India Astrology is called as jyotish vidya. Jyotish means towards jyothi

>meaning enlightenment. You might be aware from the Kalapurusha

>Jatakha(horoscope of time personified - Aries as Ascendant) that where

>venus is exalted Mercury is debilitated. You will understand that this

>venus is the lord of 2nd and 7th house. What does this mean? A person who

>can raise above the limits/bondage of kutumbha and carnal pleasures can

>expand through the medium of love to the level of embracing the universe.

>In front of such Mahaanubhavas/realised souls there is no scope for

>separate existence of reasoning faculty/intellctual capabaility represented

>by Mercury. In other words there is no trace of ego in such states. If

>there is a urge to know the roots of the intellect/reasoning faculty can

>the intellect help?!

>

>Let me go further. Atman+ imprints(intellect+mind)+sharira(body) in

>totality speaks about the life of an individual.If you want to know the

>nature of Atman can the intellect help? What jyotish vidya does is to help

>the native/individual in transcending the boundaries of imprints. This can

>be further simplified. Silence + Sound(nisabdha+sabdha) are the two major

>concepts of life. Silence is called as Atman. Sound can be further

>divided. Vaikhari, madhyama, pashyanti, Para. Vaikhari to pashyanthi are

>various levels of sounds while Para state is nothing but silence.

>

>Everybody knows that sounds and figures are interrelated. This is

>technically called as Namaroopa.Nama is nothing but sound/imprints(region

>of intellect & mind) while Roopa refers to Sharira. The nature of Atman is

>Sat-chit-ananda/truth-knowledge and bliss.

>

>Jyotish vidya teaches that the entire Zodiac is full of sounds(108 in all).

> There are 28 nakshatra mandalas(including Abhijit). Each nakshatra

>comprises of four padas/charanas which is verily related to particular type

>of sound. Combination of various sounds results in various Roopas/Shariras.

> We call it technically as Mantras and Gods. The knowledge which helps in

>one getting out of his disturbed mental state so as to facilitate the

>journey to progress further is called as Mantrashastra. When the

>destination/goal isAtman what is the use of sitting in the earlier

>stations?!

>

>Without a complete knowledge of Mantrashastra and Jyotish

>vidya(starbased/nirayana) let us not complain that astrology is not

>complete so long as it fails to survive the test of reasoning.The root

>cause of all problems is ego/"I". Self-enquiry/who-am-I can help a bit.Help

>can be sought from a Guru. Guru means dispeller of darkness.

>

>In the lotus feet of Satguru,

>

>p.s.ramanarayanan.

>

>

> >"Jeff" >vedic astrology >To:

>vedic astrology >[vedic astrology] Recommending

>demigod worship (Re: Question to devote-as... >Fri, 14 Mar 2003

>14:28:03 -0000 > >Gordon, > >I did not intend to start a debate. But the

>Ayanamsa is still up for >grabs it seems. Demigods are ideas spoken as

>truth, yet contain >flaws. In order to dispell these characterations one

>must be sure the >truth is there. I suppose in the word "faith" the truth

>lies in ones >subjective beliefs. But if astrology is to advance, it must

>go beyond >faith in my opinion. It must survive reasoning. > >Jeff > >---

>In vedic astrology, GWBrennan@a... wrote: > > Dear Jeff > >

>I'm puzzled what you mean by 'flaws in the sidereal zodiac'. I can >see

>flaws > > in an 'our dogma is the only valid one' type of astrology or in

>the >idea that > > only astrologers in the past had real knowledge, but the

>sidereal >or the > > tropical zodiac are surely both neutral in that

>respect. 'Sayana' >and > > 'Nirayana' i.e. tropical or sidereal zodiacs

>have different >purposes. > > Nirayana is the basic astronomical system and

>Sayana has a specific >annual > > purpose. If you use the Sayana system for

>all your astrology then >you have a > > skewed view of a chart and a lot of

>basic astrology will not work >on it. > > They can not really be equally

>compared. I think that the problem >lies in > > what people believe

>astrology to be. From my studies it is clear >to me that > > astrology was

>once considered as science, in almost the same way as >today > >

>materialists think of modern science as the only source of valid

> >knowledge. > > Astrology was the only science in that sense. All

>knowledge was >there, but > > there was a great skill and usually many

>years of devotion in >learing all of > > the rules to interpret it and in

>becoming skilled in the art. >Today that > > real astrology has become

>fragmented or partly lost. I had a quick >look at > > Hank Friedman's site

>- very impressive and his information given >out on > > software is really

>excellent - 6 years ago I went to a lecture he >gave on > > that and he was

>good then. His site approaches astrological >descriptions by > > two

>methods - one is simply descriptive and there is a lot of that - > fine you

> > > can simply examine that and see if you agree or not and how it

> >compares with > > what you have learnt of the signs, planets, etc. or as

>astudent you >can > > easily learn from it. However it also uses astrology

>for the very >limited > > purpose that popular astrology is used for today

>- i.e. to describe >and to > > give form to the ego, which has no real

>existence anyway - well it >exists, > > but it is never the same. People

>are totally emotionally attached >to their > > egos and some astrology

>today seems to be used principally to >heighten their > > easily

>manipulable sense of their own always changing and always >unreal ego, > >

>to which end any untruth will serve perfectly. If it was 4003 AD >now and

>not > > 2003 people might have woken up to the fact that western astrology

> >(Sayana > > zodiac) is missing out on the real knowledge, as the western

>zodiac >is moving > > away from the astronomical positions of planets and

>the further it >goes the > > more unreal its methods will necessarily

>become. > > > > Regards > > Gordon >

>

>

>Cricket - World Cup 2003 News, Views and Match Reports.

> Sponsor

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

>

>

>

Web Hosting - establish your business online

 

 

_______________

Call US for just Rs. 5. http://www.msn.co.in/webtelephony/ Get a phone card