Functional Nature in Rasi vs Divisional Charts

[Guest guest]

Dear Gurus,

 

If a planet's functional nature in Rasi is determined by its ownership of Trik

houses (6/8/12), should we apply the same logic in divisional charts too ?

 

OR

 

Should we assume that a planet which is malefic in Rasi continues to be malefic

in divisional charts by virtue of ownership of Trik houses in Rasi irrespective

of the houses owned in divisional chart ?

 

Thanks,

Raju

[Guest guest]

Dear Rajagopal,

 

I hope you don't mind a non-guru's attempt to answer your q.

 

>

If a planet's functional nature in Rasi is determined by its ownership of Trik

houses (6/8/12), should we apply the same logic in divisional charts too ?

 

OR

 

Should we assume that a planet which is malefic in Rasi continues to be malefic

in divisional charts by virtue of ownership of Trik houses in Rasi irrespective

of the houses owned in divisional chart ?

 

Neither, mate. Treat every D-chart as a standalone chart and predict. The point

to remember is that each D-chart is a mirror of a specialized facet, and it's

in relation to that particular facet that some planet turns benefic or malefic

depending on its placment in that D-chart. For example, in my chart, Sa is 5/6L

in D-1 but 9/10L in D-10. The beneficience/maleficience of Sa varies

accordingly, depending on which D-chart I see. And don't forget to look at a

graha's chara karakatwa in predictions.

 

Warm regards,

 

Ramapriya

hubli (AT) vsnl (DOT) com

[Guest guest]

JAYA JAGANNATHA!

 

Dear Rajagopal,

 

Namaste.

 

Just to add some thoughts.

-

Ramapriya D

vedic astrology

Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:57 AM

Re: [vedic astrology] Functional Nature in Rasi vs Divisional Charts

Dear Rajagopal,

 

I hope you don't mind a non-guru's attempt to answer your q.

 

>

If a planet's functional nature in Rasi is determined by its ownership of Trik

houses (6/8/12), should we apply the same logic in divisional charts too ?

 

OR

 

Should we assume that a planet which is malefic in Rasi continues to be malefic

in divisional charts by virtue of ownership of Trik houses in Rasi irrespective

of the houses owned in divisional chart ?

 

Neither, mate. Treat every D-chart as a standalone chart and predict. The point

to remember is that each D-chart is a mirror of a specialized facet, and it's

in relation to that particular facet that some planet turns benefic or malefic

depending on its placment in that D-chart. For example, in my chart, Sa is 5/6L

in D-1 but 9/10L in D-10. The beneficience/maleficience of Sa varies

accordingly, depending on which D-chart I see. And don't forget to look at a

graha's chara karakatwa in predictions.

 

Correctly stated by Ramapriya, why analysing functionality we treat the separate

divisional charts on their own. However, there is a concept of Karya Bhava and

Karyesha, i.e. for each and every divisional chart there is a certain house in

the Rasi which will represent the given life area. For example for the Navamsa

it's the 7th, for Saptamsa it's the 5th etc. So we take the lord of that house

in Rasi (Karyesha) and judge its placement in the Varga. Here the houses owned

by the planet both in Rasi and the D-chart will come into play.

 

Yours,

 

Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer gauranga (AT) brihaspati (DOT) net Jyotish Remedies:

WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET Phone:+36-309-140-839

[Guest guest]

Dear Gauranga ji,

 

So an extension of this means, that while analysing transit behavior

for a particular D-Chart, a planet may be positive for one D chart

and negative for another D-Chart. Hence exaltation of a planet in a D-

chart could be good or bad depending on how its placed only inside

that D-chart.

 

Thanks for your clarification.

 

Raju

 

vedic astrology, Gauranga Das <gauranga@b...>

wrote:

> JAYA JAGANNATHA!

>

> Dear Rajagopal,

>

> Namaste.

>

> Just to add some thoughts.

> -

> Ramapriya D

> vedic astrology

> Thursday, March 13, 2003 2:57 AM

> Re: [vedic astrology] Functional Nature in Rasi vs

Divisional Charts

>

>

> Dear Rajagopal,

>

> I hope you don't mind a non-guru's attempt to answer your q.

>

> >

> If a planet's functional nature in Rasi is determined by its

ownership of Trik houses (6/8/12), should we apply the same logic in

divisional charts too ?

>

> OR

>

> Should we assume that a planet which is malefic in Rasi continues

to be malefic in divisional charts by virtue of ownership of Trik

houses in Rasi irrespective of the houses owned in divisional chart ?

>

> Neither, mate. Treat every D-chart as a standalone chart and

predict. The point to remember is that each D-chart is a mirror of a

specialized facet, and it's in relation to that particular facet that

some planet turns benefic or malefic depending on its placment in

that D-chart. For example, in my chart, Sa is 5/6L in D-1 but 9/10L

in D-10. The beneficience/maleficience of Sa varies accordingly,

depending on which D-chart I see. And don't forget to look at a

graha's chara karakatwa in predictions.

>

> Correctly stated by Ramapriya, why analysing functionality we

treat the separate divisional charts on their own. However, there is

a concept of Karya Bhava and Karyesha, i.e. for each and every

divisional chart there is a certain house in the Rasi which will

represent the given life area. For example for the Navamsa it's the

7th, for Saptamsa it's the 5th etc. So we take the lord of that house

in Rasi (Karyesha) and judge its placement in the Varga. Here the

houses owned by the planet both in Rasi and the D-chart will come

into play.

>

> Yours,

>

> Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer

> gauranga@b...

> Jyotish Remedies:

> WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET

> Phone:+36-309-140-839

[Guest guest]

JAYA JAGANNATHA!

 

Dear Raju,

 

Namaste.

 

 

> Dear Gauranga ji,

>

> So an extension of this means, that while analysing transit behavior

> for a particular D-Chart, a planet may be positive for one D chart

> and negative for another D-Chart. Hence exaltation of a planet in a D-

> chart could be good or bad depending on how its placed only inside

> that D-chart.

>

> Thanks for your clarification.

 

As for transits in D-charts, another important factor should be noted. If we

teke the literal transit of the physicasl planets through varuois amsas,

then obviously the transit of planets say over the D-60 amsas would be of a

very short period. However all the planets have natural speeds which we are

accustomed to, like 1 year in a sign for Jupiter, 2.5 years for Saturn, etc.

Therefore it is more wise to take the sign in Rasi, in which the planet is

situated, and assume that it influences the same Rasi in the D-chart. Like

if Jupiter is in Cancer for one year, you also take that it transits Cancer

in Navamsa for 1 year, and not 1/9th of it. Then of course their

functionality will vary according to the lagna (or Moon) placement in the

respective varga. Another hint: if we assess transits in Varga charts, it is

more realistic to calculate from Candra Lagna, than from Janma lagna. In

Rasi however both could be applied.

 

Yours,

 

Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer

gauranga

Jyotish Remedies:

WWW.BRIHASPATI.NET

Phone:+36-309-140-839