Guest guest Posted January 24, 2003 Report Share Posted January 24, 2003 Dear Chandrashekarji and everyone, Respect to the learned members. Thanks for showing the way and giving me encouragement. It seems I didn’t phrase the query properly on transit results of retro planets. I will try to rephrase it with an e.g. Mer is in Sag in transit, for a cancer asc it should preferably give good results since it is 6th from natal lagna, but what happens when it becomes retrograde in the same house , then what would be the result. ( I am not taking the earlier assumption that I should take it back by one house for its results as you had corrected me on this.) Is more prominence given to transits from lagna in comparison to transit results from the moon and natal planets. I read this somewhere that one can debate that lagna is the exact moment when one is born, whereas moon stays in a sign for more than 2 days. Thanks for being patient with me. Best wishes, Sushmita Dear Sushmita, You are not far off the mark, I personally prefer to make predictions based on position of transit planets with respect to Natal Ascendant and relative position from the same planet in Natal Horoscope. About the second point too I have already said that treating retro planet in previous house is not correct. Chandrashekhar. - Sushmita S vedic astrology Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:07 PM Re: [vedic astrology] Transits of retrograde planets - more queries Hello, Respect to the learned members. Thanks to Mr. Chandrashekar, and everyone for the reply. Mr. Prabhakaran, nice of you to reply, frankly I don’t remember where I read that note. Pls excuse. I am quite sure all the classics as you mentioned would make an interesting reading, I don’t mind taking up on your advice although I really wonder if I can do that right now at such an early stage in this science. Another query, I hope I am not breaking any code of asking too many questions, seems my mind is working overtime (:: 1. If we see transit results from the Janma Rasi - Moon which denotes the mind, then shouldn’t we also simultaneously see transits from Lagna {self – since sometimes mind can react differently to an event, than the body} and along with this are to look at transits from each natal planet. e.g. Sat from natal Saturn etc. 2. I am still confused, if a retrograde planet gives a different result in a house during chart analysis, then how come the same retrograde planet doesnt give a different result in transit. and does the rules change for exalted/deb retrograde planets Pls throw some light. Regards, SS Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2003 Report Share Posted January 24, 2003 Dear Sushmita, Mercury in Sag. for Cancer lagna gives mixed results.He gives rise to a sort of rajyoga being lord of 12th and 3rd in 6th, but his position in Guru's Rasi subtract from overall results. Also benefic planet in 6th does not help and his aspect of 12th might not be good for that house,Mercury being a eunuch planet. When retrograde he might give more neneficial results than when direct. I, personally, give more importance to transit s with relation to Lagna than for moon for the following reasons. Lagna reprsents the whole personality whereas Moon represents the Mind and Mother.Again , unless Moon Lagna is more powerful than Ascendant I have found better chances of coming near correct predictions while considering transits.I also take into consideration the Maha-Antardashas, and as these are calculated based on the Nakshtra Position of Moon that facotr is also considered automatically. At least this is what I feel. Chandrashekhar. - Sushmita S vedic astrology Friday, January 24, 2003 6:30 PM Re: [vedic astrology] transit results of retro planets Dear Chandrashekarji and everyone, Respect to the learned members. Thanks for showing the way and giving me encouragement. It seems I didn’t phrase the query properly on transit results of retro planets. I will try to rephrase it with an e.g. Mer is in Sag in transit, for a cancer asc it should preferably give good results since it is 6th from natal lagna, but what happens when it becomes retrograde in the same house , then what would be the result. ( I am not taking the earlier assumption that I should take it back by one house for its results as you had corrected me on this.) Is more prominence given to transits from lagna in comparison to transit results from the moon and natal planets. I read this somewhere that one can debate that lagna is the exact moment when one is born, whereas moon stays in a sign for more than 2 days. Thanks for being patient with me. Best wishes, Sushmita Dear Sushmita, You are not far off the mark, I personally prefer to make predictions based on position of transit planets with respect to Natal Ascendant and relative position from the same planet in Natal Horoscope. About the second point too I have already said that treating retro planet in previous house is not correct. Chandrashekhar. - Sushmita S vedic astrology Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:07 PM Re: [vedic astrology] Transits of retrograde planets - more queries Hello, Respect to the learned members. Thanks to Mr. Chandrashekar, and everyone for the reply. Mr. Prabhakaran, nice of you to reply, frankly I don’t remember where I read that note. Pls excuse. I am quite sure all the classics as you mentioned would make an interesting reading, I don’t mind taking up on your advice although I really wonder if I can do that right now at such an early stage in this science. Another query, I hope I am not breaking any code of asking too many questions, seems my mind is working overtime (:: 1. If we see transit results from the Janma Rasi - Moon which denotes the mind, then shouldn’t we also simultaneously see transits from Lagna {self – since sometimes mind can react differently to an event, than the body} and along with this are to look at transits from each natal planet. e.g. Sat from natal Saturn etc. 2. I am still confused, if a retrograde planet gives a different result in a house during chart analysis, then how come the same retrograde planet doesnt give a different result in transit. and does the rules change for exalted/deb retrograde planets Pls throw some light. Regards, SS Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 24, 2003 Report Share Posted January 24, 2003 hi sushmita, a simple ans to ur question while analysing the horoscope for retograde planets is---- its power/intensity/affect is magnified when compared to direct motion .if benefic the benefic result is magnifed. if malefic the malefic result is magnified. thanks withh care ajoy vedic astrology, Sushmita S <sushmita34> wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekarji and everyone, > > > > Respect to the learned members. > > > > Thanks for showing the way and giving me encouragement. > > > > It seems I didn't phrase the query properly on transit results of retro planets. I will try to rephrase it with an e.g. > > Mer is in Sag in transit, for a cancer asc it should preferably give good results since it is 6th from natal lagna, but what happens when it becomes retrograde in the same house , then what would be the result. ( I am not taking the earlier assumption that I should take it back by one house for its results as you had corrected me on this.) > > Is more prominence given to transits from lagna in comparison to transit results from the moon and natal planets. I read this somewhere that one can debate that lagna is the exact moment when one is born, whereas moon stays in a sign for more than 2 days. > > > > > > Thanks for being patient with me. > > > > Best wishes, > Sushmita Dear Sushmita,You are not far off the mark, I personally prefer to make predictions based on position of transit planets with respect to Natal Ascendant and relative position from the same planet in Natal Horoscope.About the second point too I have already said that treating retro planet in previous house is not correct.Chandrashekhar.- Sushmita S vedic astrology Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:07 PMRe: [vedic astrology] Transits of retrograde planets - more queries > > > > Hello, > > Respect to the learned members. > > Thanks to Mr. Chandrashekar, and everyone for the reply. > > Mr. Prabhakaran, nice of you to reply, frankly I don't remember where I read that note. Pls excuse. > > I am quite sure all the classics as you mentioned would make an interesting reading, I don't mind taking up on your advice although I really wonder if I can do that right now at such an early stage in this science. > > Another query, I hope I am not breaking any code of asking too many questions, seems my mind is working overtime (:: > > 1. If we see transit results from the Janma Rasi - Moon which denotes the mind, then shouldn't we also simultaneously see transits from Lagna {self – since sometimes mind can react differently to an event, than the body} and along with this are to look at transits from each natal planet. e.g. Sat from natal Saturn etc. > > 2. I am still confused, if a retrograde planet gives a different result in a house during chart analysis, then how come the same retrograde planet doesnt give a different result in transit. and does the rules change for exalted/deb retrograde planets > > Pls throw some light. > > Regards, > > > > SS > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 26, 2003 Report Share Posted January 26, 2003 Hi to all, but surely if lord of ascendant is Saturn his beneficence is greater since he is Lagnesh? Regards, Ognjen - ">ajoypb <ajoypb (AT) (DOT) co.in> vedic astrology Saturday, January 25, 2003 6:24 AM [vedic astrology] Re: transit results of retro planets hi sushmita, a simple ans to ur question while analysing the horoscopefor retograde planets is---- its power/intensity/affect is magnifiedwhen compared to direct motion .if benefic the benefic result is magnifed. if malefic the malefic result is magnified.thankswithh care ajoy--- In vedic astrology, Sushmita S <sushmita34>wrote:> > Dear Chandrashekarji and everyone,> > > > Respect to the learned members.> > > > Thanks for showing the way and giving me encouragement. > > > > It seems I didn't phrase the query properly on transit results of retro planets. I will try to rephrase it with an e.g.> > Mer is in Sag in transit, for a cancer asc it should preferably give good results since it is 6th from natal lagna, but what happens when it becomes retrograde in the same house , then what would be the result. ( I am not taking the earlier assumption that I should take it back by one house for its results as you had corrected me on this.)> > Is more prominence given to transits from lagna in comparison to transit results from the moon and natal planets. I read this somewhere that one can debate that lagna is the exact moment when one is born, whereas moon stays in a sign for more than 2 days.> > > > > > Thanks for being patient with me.> > > > Best wishes,> > > > > > > > Sushmita> > > > > > > Dear Sushmita,You are not far off the mark, I personally prefer to make predictions based on position of transit planets with respect to Natal Ascendant and relative position from the same planet in Natal Horoscope.About the second point too I have already said that treating retro planet in previous house is not correct.Chandrashekhar.- Sushmita S To: vedic astrology Thursday, January 23, 2003 5:07 PMRe: [vedic astrology] Transits of retrograde planets -more queries> > > > Hello,> > Respect to the learned members.> > Thanks to Mr. Chandrashekar, and everyone for the reply.> > Mr. Prabhakaran, nice of you to reply, frankly I don't remember where I read that note. Pls excuse. > > I am quite sure all the classics as you mentioned would make an interesting reading, I don't mind taking up on your advice although I really wonder if I can do that right now at such an early stage in this science.> > Another query, I hope I am not breaking any code of asking too many questions, seems my mind is working overtime (:: > > 1. If we see transit results from the Janma Rasi - Moon which denotes the mind, then shouldn't we also simultaneously see transits from Lagna {self – since sometimes mind can react differently to an event, than the body} and along with this are to look at transits from each natal planet. e.g. Sat from natal Saturn etc. > > 2. I am still confused, if a retrograde planet gives a different result in a house during chart analysis, then how come the same retrograde planet doesnt give a different result in transit. and does the rules change for exalted/deb retrograde planets > > Pls throw some light.> > Regards,> > > > SS> > > > > > > > > > > > Do you ?> Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up nowArchives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.