Re:Tithi Ashtottari Antardasa Sequence Clarification

[Guest guest]

Namaste Narasimha,

 

>Bottomline: Sanjay and I use the same approach - what I taught in the TA

>dasa tutorial. However, this need not be the final word (as always).

 

 

Thank you very much for your answer.

However, I am not convinced about the rule giving the 1st antardasa for the

planet following the dasa planet.

It seems to me, that the reckoning “in reverse” is here half-applied.

 

This is what I mean: for example in Sun dasa the order should be “normally”

Su, Mo … Ra and Ve. In reverse, we have Ve, Ra, … Mo and Su. Here the shift

of 1st antardasa (backwards) is comprehensible.

 

Can you explain me, what is the logic for similar, but “forwards” shift in

your system of reckoning?

 

With best regards

 

Waldemar

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 3 months FREE*.

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU=

http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_eliminateviruse\

s_3mf

[Guest guest]

Namaste Narasimha,

 

I want to add one thing.

 

If we reckon antars of Sun dasa in reverse, but backwards, we have your

system of reckoning.

Su, Mo … Ra & Ve in reverse : Su, Ve … Ma & Me. That sequence in order from

the last planet to the first gives Me, Ma … Ve & Su. It is like yours

reckoning. But why vipreeta Ketu is applied 2 times here?

 

With best regards

 

Waldemar

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 3 months FREE*.

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=7474&SU\

=

http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_smartspamprotec\

tion_3mf