Re:Moksh confirmed

[Guest guest]

Dear Sundeep

 

RAM KRISHN HARE

 

Why do you think that simple things are not acceptable?

This is the ONLY WAY in Kaliyug.

The logic is very simple.If you take HIS name with your last

breath,you have

destroyed all previous sins and before doing any more sin,you die.So

being

without sins,you can get Moksh.God and Sins can never stay togather

just

like light and darkness.

 

Put your hand in fire it will burn!Do you need to be calm to get burn?

Eat food and your hunger will be satisfied even if you are not calm.

All good/bad karmas are by body so verbal uttering can also give

Moksh.

Haven't you read how verbal-insult of Duryodhan by Draupadi resulted

in

Mahabharat war?If some ordinary(!) words can create such great

war,why do

you have doubts that HIS name will not give Moksh?

 

Still not convinced?Read the story of Ajamil from Srimad-Bhagvat.

I will give you just the summery:

Ajamil was a very bad person doing only bad things.On advice of a

sadhu

he kept the name of his son Narayan.while dying,he called his son.

Being Narayan, He was saved by God and blessed with more life.

 

KALIYUG KEVAL NAM AADHARA, SUMIRI-SUMIRI NAR UTARAHI(N) PARA

 

 

Thanks

 

Anilkumar

 

OM TAT SAT

*******************

You Wrote:

Dear Anil,

The title of your message reminds me of a gavel thumping down at an

auction. SOLD! :-)

 

That aside, I have read the same thing in the Gita (Srila

Prabhupada's interpretation). However, my interpretation of Srila

Prabhupada's comments was somewhat different - not so literal and

simple. More than simply repeatedly verbally uttering a specific

Sanskrit phrase at the moment of death, what I understood was that at

the moment of death your mind must be in a calm and detached state,

not focussed on the senses or sense objects, but focussed on God.

That state, if achieved, is much more important and is what is meant

by remembering God at the time of death. It isnt as simple as you

seem to be saying, if you think about it - if I were in a plane

plummeting towards the ground heading towards certain death, I could

probably be screaming names of God, in a lot of languages including

Sanskrit, until I met my end, but I would certainly not be able to

get my mind into a calm and detached state, not focussed on my

inevitable end. That is why Moksh is so hard, I believe. Moksh, BY

DEFINITION, is understanding that you are not the body and not the

senses. How can verbal utterances, which is simply exercising one of

your senses, achieve that result?

 

Sundeep