Relationships between lumniaries

[Guest guest]

Vyam Vyasa-devaya Namah,

 

Dear List,

A few days back I posted a question regarding mutual aspects of

luminaries. I thought the aspect of Sun over moon might overshadow

moon as sun is too bright, but Ramapriya explained me that there is

nothing wrong with that and in fact it is good for moon. Now, what

about conjunction of luminaries?

 

I am very interested in relationships between these luminaries as in

my horoscope, either the two lunimaries mutually aspect each other or

are conjunct. Mutual aspects in D1, D9, D3, D4, D7, D10, D11, D12,

D27) and conjunct in D2, D5, D6, D8, D16, D20, D24, D30, D40, D45 and

D60. None of them is in debilitation in any of these charts. While

they are afflicted by malifics in one or two charts, in most cases

either the sun or moon is in exalted, in its own rasi or part of a

good/raja yoga or conjunct with benefics like Jupiter. The only

prominent malefic association is in rasi where Moon is conjunct with

Ketu in 4 and sun with Rahu in 10, in a KSY/KAY combination broken by

moon.

 

No other planets (with the exception of nodes ofcourse) seem to have

such a relationship.

 

Thanks in advance.

-Siva.

[Guest guest]

Dear Siva,

 

-

"schinnas" <schinnas >

<vedic astrology>

Monday, October 07, 2002 6:41 AM

[vedic astrology] Relationships between lumniaries

> Vyam Vyasa-devaya Namah,> > Dear List,> A few days back I posted a question

regarding mutual aspects of > luminaries. I thought the aspect of Sun over moon

might overshadow > moon as sun is too bright, but Ramapriya explained me that

there is > nothing wrong with that and in fact it is good for moon. Now, what >

about conjunction of luminaries? > > I am very interested in relationships

between these luminaries as in > my horoscope, either the two lunimaries

mutually aspect each other or > are conjunct. Mutual aspects in D1, D9, D3, D4,

D7, D10, D11, D12, > D27) and conjunct in D2, D5, D6, D8, D16, D20, D24, D30,

D40, D45 and > D60. None of them is in debilitation in any of these charts.

While > they are afflicted by malifics in one or two charts, in most cases >

either the sun or moon is in exalted, in its own rasi or part of a > good/raja

yoga or conjunct with benefics like Jupiter.

 

A conjunction of planets in the same house is the most dramatic and intense

relationship of all. The area of life that'll be most affected will be the

house they're in, all the matters ruled by this house will come to the

forefront. I guess the crux of it all is that the two conjoining planets must

be natural friends or neutral at worst. I infer this from the way temporary

relationships are defined. Temporary friends of a planet are those that are in

the three houses on either side of the house in which the planet is. If Sun is

in Ge, its temporary pals are those that are in Pi, Ar, Ta, Cn, Le and Vi. Note

that Ge itself is missing! Which means that, if Sun and Ven are conjoined, hell

is likely to break looses. They're naturally foes, and no love lost temporarily

either.

 

This is the general rule. I just apply the same principle to all D-charts too.

 

> The only prominent malefic association is in rasi where Moon is conjunct with

> Ketu in 4 and sun with Rahu in 10, in a KSY/KAY combination broken by moon.

Just to confirm whether KSY is indeed broken, check for the longitudes for Su

and Mo. One of them has to be on the leeward side, i.e. Mo should have a higher

longitude than Ra, and Su a lower one than Ke.

> No other planets (with the exception of nodes ofcourse) seem to have such a relationship.

I've read somewhere in BPHS that Ra and Ke behave like the planet they're with.

Left to themselves, they behave like the lords of the houses they're in. Hari

Katti keeps reminding me that Ra behaves like Sa and Ke like Ma; sounds

logical, since Ra and Ke have their own houses in Aq and Sc.

> Thanks in advance.> -Siva.

Warm regards,

Ramapriya

hubli (AT) vsnl (DOT) com