Guest guest Posted August 5, 2002 Report Share Posted August 5, 2002 Namaste Dewavrat ji, > Dear shri Narasimha Raoji, > > Many many thanks for such a prompt reply. I have read your novel > approach towards the analysis of divisional charts. I have gone > through the view of shri sheshadri iyer and was quite ingluenced by > his techniques. But on reading your various message archives I am > quite impressed by your thoughts and novel insight into div charts. I Thank you for your kind comments. My insights are not quite novel. They are based on the age-old teachings of the Guru-Sishya parampara that I belong to. My guru is Pt. Sanjay Rath of Puri, who belongs to a tradition that traces itself to Sri Achyuta Dasa, one of the pancha sakhas (five associates) of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. You may want to read my book "Vedic Astrology: An Integrated Approach" and Pt. Rath's "Crux of Vedic Astrology: Timing of Events". > believe the ultimate divisional chart is D150 i.e. Nadi. What is your > definition of a nadi. Do you take it as the 1/5th part of the > degree.Recently I have published one book in marathi on d charts. It > is co authored by my senior astrologer shri V.V.Divekar of Nagpur. > While Preparing the tables for the complete set of 20 divisional > charts including tajaka. I noticed one thing that the total number of > divisions of a sgn i.e. 30 degrees comes to exact 150. So if we take I am afraid you made some mistake. If you take all the 20 divisional charts (including D-11), then the number of divisions in a sign comes to 160 and not to 150. Nadi is also called Chandra Kala Nadi. Chandra kala means sixteen. Thus nadi is based only on the 16 divisional charts taught by Parasara. If you mark the divisions as per these charts within each rasi, you indeed get exactly 150 parts. D-5, D-6 and D-8 make no difference, but D-11 does. If you include D-11, the number of divisions becomes 160 instead of 150. For those confused, the following link may be helpful. I clearly explained this and gave the list of the beginning and ending longitudes of each nadi last year. Please follow this link: vedic astrology/message/10453 > it one part as nadi then the nadi division is un equal and from this > point of view the divisional charts gets the more weightage. This > view of nadi division is also supproted by shri C.S.Patel. I would > like to have your view on this aspect. > Secondly your views on D60 are very astonishing especial on the past > lives. Kindly enlighten me on this aspect of past lives wrt D60 as I > do not have the material written by you. Once again many thanks for > your prompt answers. With regards I remain Some other time... > yours > > dewavrat buit It's nice to know you. BTW, SJVC (Sri Jagannath Vedic Centre) is organizing a workshop on divisional charts at Hyderabad, India during Dec 2-10, 2002. Those of you who are within a reasonable distance from Hyderabad may want to attend it. For more details, please go to http://www.geocities.com/sjvc_east May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.