Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 Dear Claudio, I have so far translated 48 chapters of BPHS in French and I have no idea where you could have found that Maharishi Parasara advised a year of 360 days... Regards. Lucas. _______________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 Om Gurave Namah ------------------------ Dear Lucas Maharishi parasara could never have said such a thing - whether in BPHS or any othe writing like the Rig Veda. A samvatsara is defined by the entry of the Sun into sidereal Aries and this definition has been held by Varahamihira who was an ardent follower of the preceptors and aa worshipper of Surya. That is why I use 360 degree motion of the Sun and nothing else. Best Regards, Sanjay Rath Web: http://sanjayrath.tripod.com - "Kurkowiak Lucas" <larry_golad <vedic astrology> Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:53 PM [vedic astrology] Re : Why vimshottari in 365.25 > Dear Claudio, > > I have so far translated 48 chapters of BPHS in French and I have no idea > where you could have found that Maharishi Parasara advised a year of 360 > days... > > Regards. > > Lucas. > > _______________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > ------------------------ Sponsor ---------------------~--> > Buy Stock for $4 > and no minimums. > FREE Money 2002. > http://us.click./orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/.8XolB/TM > ---~-> > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 dear guru's and friends, Sorry I have been somehow confused with some old (manual) reckoning of the vimshottari dasha that I did years ago where the years were of 360 days (12 months of 30 days). I supposed this came from Parashara but I didn't find at that time where it was written indeed. So if I have understood the recknoning is in 365.25 days? The reason I ask you this, is that I have always done this way even though I had some "erractic" results that I couldn't explain (dasha not machting the event). I just put this on my ignorance of some rule and went on. With the study of Jaimini my results have been greatly improved. But last year happend to me a thing that decidedly didn't match at all in the vimshottari 365.25. I had a crises of RSI (repetitive strain injury, carpal syndrome injury) in the right arm mid june 2001.My DOB 27/02/1962 at 21h 51' 20" Brussels 50N51 4E21. It's over now thank to Ayur veda. Recently I read on the archives that Narasimha uses the Vimsh.360 and this picked up my curiosity and give me the idea of trying the vimsho 360 days (a female friend jyotishi uses this with succes, but I never paid attention to it). And with this it matches perfectly and mostly if I use your rule Sanjay of Sun for Maha, then Moon for Antar etc. I went back to all the important events of my life and I just can note that it matches better. So, can some one explain what is this option of reckoning the vimshottari in 360. Is it just a new original finding of this computerized era or is it based on something more sound and ancestral ? Without pretending this rule being universal, I find it quite interesting in the few charts on which I tried it. best regards Claudio - Sanjay Rath vedic astrology Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:01 PM Re: [vedic astrology] Re : Why vimshottari in 365.25 Om Gurave Namah ------------------------ Dear Lucas Maharishi parasara could never have said such a thing - whether in BPHS or any othe writing like the Rig Veda. A samvatsara is defined by the entry of the Sun into sidereal Aries and this definition has been held by Varahamihira who was an ardent follower of the preceptors and aa worshipper of Surya. That is why I use 360 degree motion of the Sun and nothing else. Best Regards, Sanjay Rath Web: http://sanjayrath.tripod.com - "Kurkowiak Lucas" <larry_golad (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> To: <vedic astrology> Tuesday, May 07, 2002 2:53 PM Subject: [vedic astrology] Re : Why vimshottari in 365.25 > Dear Claudio, > > I have so far translated 48 chapters of BPHS in French and I have no idea > where you could have found that Maharishi Parasara advised a year of 360 > days... > > Regards. > > Lucas. > > _______________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > ------------------------ Sponsor ---------------------~--> > Buy Stock for $4 > and no minimums. > FREE Money 2002. > http://us.click./orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/.8XolB/TM > ---~-> > > > > Group info: vedic astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu || > > Your use of is subject to > > > Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2002 Report Share Posted May 7, 2002 Dear Friends, Sorry for Intruding into this conversation. We are having 2 kinds of years, viz samvatsara and varsha. Samvatsara is defined as Yugaadi-to-Yugaadi cycle and varsha is defined as vernal equinox to vernal equinox cycle. Samvatsara Loosely, a samvatsara is a 'year' but in reality it is a bit longer than the seasonal year or varsha of Samskr`ta. This may help you out Rgds, VR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.