Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 Vyam Vysadevaya Namah ------------------- Dear Narasimha, Namaste. Due to the discussion regarding the word; "Thousand", i decided to look it up phonetically. Thousand (Ó¨aÏ…zÓ™nd). As you can see the actual pronounciation of the '-sand' part is more akin to a 'jh' or 's' and not 'j'. Best wishes, Visti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2002 Report Share Posted April 12, 2002 Dear Visti, > Due to the discussion regarding the word; "Thousand", i decided to look it up phonetically. > > Thousand (Ó¨aÏ…zÓ™nd). > > As you can see the actual pronounciation of the '-sand' part is more akin to a 'jh' or 's' and not 'j'. Yes, "s" in "thousand" is pronounced as "z". However, your assertion that z is closer to jh than j is not true. Neither j nor z is aspirated (stressed) like jh and zh. Your other assertion that z is closer to s than j is more appealing. The thing with j is that the tongue _touches_ the inner surface of mouth when you pronounce it. The sound "z" is very similar to "j" and the only difference is that the tongue does not touch the inner surface of mouth. It only comes very close. That's the only difference between j and z. [Note: Here, I am not talking about the j in English language. The j in English language is pronounced - by native speakers - with the tongue touching the inner surface of the mouth a little higher than in the j of Sanskrit is to be pronounced. But if you take z of English and j of Sanskrit, they are pronounced at the same place, with the difference being whether the tongue touches the surface of mouth or there is a gap.] The only similarity between z and s is that both are pronounced with a gap between the tongue and the inner surface of mouth (that's why we can continuously make the sound - sssssssssss or zzzzzzzzzzzzz, but we can't make jjjjjjjjjj). The similarity ends there. The actual position on the inner surface of mouth where tongue comes close is different for s and z. However, I can't confidently say what is the right approximation for z - s or j. But it certainly is not jh. I can say that much. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.