Guest guest Posted December 20, 2001 Report Share Posted December 20, 2001 > WHen we can clearly explain his life events through satya peetha why > should we use mayapeetha. Life is maya:) Regards, VR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2001 Report Share Posted December 20, 2001 But, aren't the Lords beyond the realm of Maya? --- venkateshwara_reddy <venkateshwara_reddy wrote: > > WHen we can clearly explain his life events > through satya peetha why > > should we use mayapeetha. > > Life is maya:) > > Regards, VR > > > > > > ------------------------ Sponsor > > Archives: > vedic astrology > > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > || > > Your use of is subject to > > > ______________________ For Stock Quotes, Finance News, Insurance, Tax Planners, Mutual Funds... Visit http://in.finance./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2001 Report Share Posted December 20, 2001 Dear prahsant that is what even i am trying to say. Let the gurus explain this first. regards partha ((((i wrote to GURU sanjay and guru pvn Dear learned gurus Shri ram is the noblest soul ever to take birth on the bhoomi. My simple question is to ask you is to why you have used the arudha padas and upapada for analysing the divine soul chart. Arudha lagna, the arudha padas of various rasis and planets should be used for little mortals like me who have percieved personality and actaul personality. Shri Ram did not have an image which was contradictory to his lagnapeetha. He was the purest of souls and using arudha to analyse his chart is baffling to say the least. Shri ram stood by what his ideals. He is the ideal son, brother, husband and king. He followed according to the dharma. I seriously do not understand why we should use Arudha for him .. WHen we can clearly explain his life events through satya peetha why should we use mayapeetha. regards partha)))))))))) vedic astrology, Prashanth Achar <acharpastrology> wrote: > But, aren't the Lords beyond the realm of Maya? > > --- venkateshwara_reddy > <venkateshwara_reddy> wrote: > > WHen we can > clearly explain his life events > > through satya peetha why > > > should we use mayapeetha. > > > > Life is maya:) > > > > Regards, VR > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Sponsor > > > > Archives: > > vedic astrology > > > > Group info: > > > vedic astrology/info.html > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > > vedic astrology-@e... > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > > || > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > > > ____________________ __ > For Stock Quotes, Finance News, Insurance, Tax Planners, Mutual Funds... > Visit http://in.finance./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2001 Report Share Posted December 21, 2001 ***Jaya Jagannath***Dear Partha, Further comments are given below: - Best WishesSanjay Rathhttp://sanjayrath.tripod.com***Om Tat Sat*** You wrote: Dear learned gurus :Shri ram is the noblest soul ever to take birth on the bhoomi.My simple question is to ask you is to why you have used the arudha padas and upapada for analysing the divine soul chart. Rath: Because these are the standard tools of Vedic Astrology as taught by PARASARA. Try answering these questions: (1) Is Krishna different from Ram? If they are not different, then why are thier charts different? If they are different, then Who is nobler??? You have used the word 'soul' inadvertantly implying individual Atma. Please rethink on this and refer to chapter-1 of BPHS. You wrote: Arudha lagna, the arudha padas of various rasis and planets should be used for little mortals like me who have percieved personality and actaul personality. Shri Ram did not have an image which was contradictory to his lagna peetha. He was the purest of souls and using arudha to analyse his chart is baffling to say the least. Rath: Please quote the source of your comment that Arudha Pada should only be used for little mortals and not for the incarnations of Vishnu. Perhaps this is your personal perception. secondly you assume that the images of people are contradictory to their Lagna's ideals. This perception is also wrong. Look at Sri Jayendra Saraswati, Srila Prabhupada and a host of other mortals - are thier images different from their ideals? So, this assumption is also not correct. Your statement that He was the purest of souls is also incorrect technically as this implies that He is being compared to other mortal souls like you and I. Sri Rama has a very large portion of Paramatmamsa and cannot be said to be a simple soul. Terms like noble and pure are relative and cannot be used to describe the absolute. They give a relative picture like one glass of water is purer than another but that which is beyond perception cannot be classified. In fact the only way to understand the leela is to study the Arudha as this indicates as to why They did what They did. You wrote: Shri Ram stood by what his ideals. He is the ideal son, brother, husband and king. He followed according to the dharma. I seriously do not understand why we should use Arudha for him. Rath: Ideals are seen from the Lagna or Satya peetha. We all stand by our own ideals. Even Dawood Ibrahim the murderer stands by his ideals because he believes that killing is what is right for him. Valmiki stood by his ideals when he was murdering and looting the pilgrims and also when he was writing the Ramayana. Ideals are based on the Lagna and the Dhi Shakti in it. They are dependant on the Guna of the lagna. The Rama Who we pray everyday is beyond the Guna and using a term like 'ideal' is not correct for the Lord as He is beyond the Guna (Gunateeta). However, when we used the term ideal, we are referring only to His physical incarnation as Rama the son of Dasaratha (then He is not the son of so many Bhakta). Fine as this is the only way we can study His chart. When any being manifests, He is governed by the Guna and the Moon in lagna gives Him tremendous compassion for one and all. It is this compassion that we call the symbol of divinity. Sri Krishna, Rama and all Vishnu incarnations have arrived due to their compassion or mercy for the beings in this planet. This is seen in the presence of the Moon in thier Lagna. However, the image will change as time passes since their birth. The baby Krishna's image in the world of Vrindavan changed after killing Putana and later after killing Kamsa He was recognised as a great wrestler. Similarly, Rama's image changes from a small child in the eyes of His father to that of a powerful warrior after He killed the demons and even broke Shiva's bow and married Sita. Time changes the Arudha. The perception about Rama also changed with time during His sojourn in this planet and this is explained by the Arudha. We are referring to Rama whose exploits are already known but then this is His final image after all His exploits and actions were recorded and portrayed for the world. You should think in these lines to appreciate the need for the Arudha and other similar tools. You wrote: WHen we can clearly explain his life events through satya peetha why should we use mayapeetha. Rath: Perfectly fine, but are you sure you can stand the scrutiny of various scholars on this. If so, then let us begin by your trying to answer the following questions: (1) When the charts of Sri Rama and Sri Lakshman are the same, why was Rama the eldest and Lakshman the third born? Similarly, why was Rama's wife the eldest and Lakshman's wife the third child? Also, why did Rama's spouse accompany Him while Laxman's did not do so during their period in the jungles.(2) When the charts of Rama & Lakshman are the same, why is it that Rama had so many faithful followers and not Lakshman? what star indicates Vibheeshana the greatest Rama Bhakta (I think)? It is easier to stay among saints and recite the name of Rama than to be in the city of demons and do so; it is easier to side by your kith and kin and support Rama than to become inimical to your whole clan and do so. In that sense, the test for Vibheeshana was greater than that for Hanuman. (3) What are the indications that Rama is the highest possible manifestation of SURYA as indicated by Parasara? Hint: Attempt to bring out the link between Vishwamitra the Rishi of the Gayatri Mantra (RV III.62.10) and Sri Rama's marriage. Also show the bow of Shiva as the weapon that finally proved that Rama was physically the strongest among the princes gathered for the test. Hope you enjoy this exercise Best Wishes Sanjay Rath P.s. I am copying this to Varahamihira for interested students to attempt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 21, 2001 Report Share Posted December 21, 2001 ***Jaya Jagannath***Dear Prashant Achar, Patha & Venkateswar Reddy, When you make a statement that the 'Lords beyond the realm of Maya' then they are beyond the Bha-Chakra that symbolises the life process with time on this planet. Thus, the very casting of a horoscope is an attempt at futility. On the other hand when we accept that the Lord has appeared in this planet in a human form and shall be working within the limitations of the Maya that He has so beautifully created, then alone shall we be in a position to explain His leela in this incarnation. For example, Dasaratha was the father of Rama, but the hrashest truth is that dasaratha is another child of Rama. Rama resides in the hearts of all and hence Ravana was also rama or rama was fighting with Himself !! This can lead to a lot of confusion but will open the inner eye and this is the real Veda. Jyotish being the Vedanga helps us to examine His present incarnation like having three brothers (why three brothers, why not ten, why not the whole world - Vasudeva Kutumbakkam is His concept). Remember that whenever there is a Lagna, there shall always be an Arudha. The Lagna is the satya peetha but not the drudha Satya. It is the body which the Atma occupies and not the Image in this incarnation. The Lagna is almost similar for all human beings - we all have two hands, two legs, two eyes, a head (with some luck a little gray matter in it) and are about 3 - 7 feet in height. Yet, when it comes to Arudha, why does everyone know Bill Clinton today? How many of you recall the name of the 10th US President off hand or maybe with a look into history books youwill remember, yet inspite of so many years we recall the incarnation of Sri Rama. We may not recall His physical appearance and have mental pictures conjured up by the descriptions we have in the scriptures. Some artists imagine that He was blue in complexion whereas He was actually very fair in complexion like the Sukla Paksha Moon. Thus the Satya Peetha symbolised by the Physical Body exists in this world of Maya for a short while but the arudha exists even today as we read the Ramayana. He seems super human with such beauty, strength and ideal manner. This is the difference between Satya and Maya peetha. In fact Ramakrishna Paramhamsa has taught that it is not possible for man to realise the penultimate truth in this physical body as it is surrounded by Maya. Worship of the Divine Mother helps the soul to gradually get over this hypnosis of perpetuity of the individual self and realise the inner self, but this also does not give Moksha... I finish here. You all can become good Jyotish, but the day you grasp the real nature of the Arudha, the Lagna and the Vasu's you shall be Daivagnya. Best Wishes Sanjay Rath Best WishesSanjay Rathhttp://sanjayrath.tripod.com***Om Tat Sat*** - Prashanth Achar vedic astrology Friday, December 21, 2001 11:25 AM Re: [vedic astrology] Re: DEAR SANJAY GURU AND PVN-ARUDHA FOR RAM??? But, aren't the Lords beyond the realm of Maya? --- venkateshwara_reddy<venkateshwara_reddy > wrote: > > WHen we canclearly explain his life events> through satya peetha why > > should we use mayapeetha.> > Life is maya:)> > Regards, VR> > > > > > ------------------------ Sponsor> > Archives:> vedic astrology> > Group info:>vedic astrology/info.html> > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to> vedic astrology-> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......> > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu> || > > Your use of is subject to> > > ______________________For Stock Quotes, Finance News, Insurance, Tax Planners, Mutual Funds... Visit http://in.finance./------------------------ Sponsor ---------------------~-->Send FREE Holiday eCards from Greetings.http://us.click./IgTaHA/ZQdDAA/ySSFAA/.8XolB/TM---~->Archives: vedic astrologyGroup info: vedic astrology/info.htmlTo UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to vedic astrology-....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.