Guest guest Posted December 16, 2001 Report Share Posted December 16, 2001 Namaste Balaji, > What's the big deal about lagna nakshatra! It doesn't > require a Phd in Astronomy. I can also give enough In my tradition, both Moon's nakshatra and lagna's nakshatra are used in Sarvatobhadra chakra and have their own importance. I see lagna nakshatra completely ignored outside my tradition. > One day the star is pushya (period because it is not > obeying Navami degree range) another day it 'may' be > punarvasu. Now, after Moon, Sun of Lord Rama is > getting some warping. It is unfair to call this warping. Take the 3 points: (1) Sun is in Aries, (2) Moon is in Punarvasu, and, (3) it is Sukla Navami (either at birth or at the previous sunrise). They cannot be true simultaneously. Period. One of the factors has to be adjusted. As (3) was explicitly and unambiguously mentioned by Valmiki, it cannot be adjusted. Some adjustment is necessary in either (1) or (2). I have already outlined all the possibilities. What my guru taught me makes an adjustment in (2). I suggested that (1) itself is suspicious and gave a clear logic in my previous posts. I covered all the logical possibilities and want to stop here. Branding this honest intellectual exercise as "twisting" and "warping" is unfortunate and serves no useful purpose. > I am leaving this list and request you to terminate my > membership. Done. Take care, May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.