respected narayan sir and dear visti

[Guest guest]

dear narayan

thank you for clearing the confusion. I was insisting on Scorpio

navamsa since the last one month and finally a respectable atuhority

like you has been kind enough to clear this. Sir could you kindly

tell me where i lacked punch in my debate. I explained scorpio

navamsa through dharma and karma angles. Was i wrong there. What

exactly should i have given in my arguments so that i could have

convinced Visti regarding the same.

regards

partha

 

p.s: dear narayan, i suppose you are angry with for some particular

reason which i am not able to understand. You had not replied my

earlier mails. Could you kindly forgive me if i had hurt you in any

way. My intentions are always to learn and not argue , may be my

style is slightly crude which i am continuosly trying to refine. I am

trying very hard to shed my jovian nature and be more mercurian

(laughs).

 

 

vedic astrology, "Narayan Iyer" <narayan_iyer@m...> wrote:

> Hare Rama Krishna

> -----------------

>

> Dear Partha & Visti,

>

> I prefer Sc Lagnamsa for Swami Vevekananda. Sc has Ju in Lagna with

> Venus & Ketu in Trines. As per Jaimini Sutras, Ju in Lagnamsa gives

> an excellent Karma Yogi with tremendous intellect and and all-round

> knowledge.

>

> As per Jaimini, Venus in Swamsa or 5H indicates a poet, an Eloquent

> speaker or a knowledgable critic!!!

>

> 7L Me in D-1 in 6H in D-9, is not good for marriage.

> 7H in D-9 has Mars & Saturn!!!

>

> D-24 Lagna is Taurus a fixed sign with Saturn the planet of

> Concentration and Yogekaraka combined with Moon(Mind) in a fixed

sign

> explains his intellectual disposition.

>

> 4H has Moon shows his degree in Arts!!!

>

>

> Regards

> Narayan

>

>

>

>

>

> vedic astrology, partvinu5 wrote:

> > dear visti

> > i knew i was debating. may be i used the wrong terminology.

please

> > forgive me if you think that i was trying to box my way out.

> > (laughs). i am too frail to do that. i am very thin for my

enormous

> > height. I request other list members to participate and explain

why

> > swami vivekananda had vrischika navamsa lagna.

> > regards

> > partha

> >

> > p.s: dear visti i regard you in very high esteem. i was just

trying

> > to point out a small error in calculation. please forgive me if i

> was

> > going overboard. i love you my brother.

> >

> >

> > vedic astrology, Visti Larsen <in_joy_i_scream>

> > wrote:

> > > Hare Rama Krishna

> > > -------------------------------

> > > Dear Partha,

> > > I didn't know we were arguing, i thought we were

> > > debating, which is the propper usage of this

> > > email-list.

> > >

> > > Why are you arguing birthtime, when what matters is

> > > what the horoscope shows? I don't know why i had set

> > > the timezone for 6:30 = china, actually i was more

> > > concerned about the chart itself.

> > >

> > > Please forgive me, and yes i have looked at the chart

> > > in the archives, yet i don't see why Vivekenanda

> > > couldn't have Kanya Lagnamsa. Actually i'm more

> > > inclined towards Kanya Lagnamsa than Vrishchika

> > > Lagnamsa.

> > >

> > > If you want to fight, become a boxer, this isn't the

> > > propper place for this.

> > >

> > > If anyone else feels that Vrischika Lagna is propper,

> > > then correct me.

> > >

> > > Best wishes, Visti.

> > >

> > > --- partvinu5 wrote:

> > > > DEAR DEAR VISTI

> > > > SHALL I SEND THE BIRTH CHART THAT YOU HAD GIVEN TO

> > > > ME TO THE WHOLE

> > > > GROUP. WHAT SHOULD I DO NOW WHEN YOU ARE CHANGING

> > > > THE BRITH TIME JUST

> > > > TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENTS.

> > > > YOU HAD EARLIER GIVEN THIS DETAILS

> > > > DATE: 12TH JAN 1863

> > > > TIME: 6 35 AM

> > > > TIME ZONE: 6 30 EAST OF GMT.

> > > > YOU HAVE TO CHANGE THE TIME ZONE TO 5 53 AS THE

> > > > BIRTH PLACE IS IN

> > > > INDIA AND NOT IN CHINA(LAUGHS).yOU JUST CANNOT

> > > > CHANGE THE BIRTH TIME

> > > > FROM 6 30 AM TO 5 59 AM. HOW WHIMSICAL.

> > > > SWAMIJI WAS AN INDIAN AND NOT CHINESE BROHTER. I

> > > > HAVE TOLD YOU TO

> > > > CHANGE THE TIME ZONE WHICH YOU TAKEN WRONGLY AND NOT

> > > > CHANGE THE BIRTH

> > > > TIME ITSELF.

> > > > I HAD EARLIER REQUESTED YOU TO GO TO OUR FILES

> > > > SECTION AND SEE THE

> > > > CHART OF SWAMI VIVEKANANDA IN DATA BANK, DID YOU DO

> > > > IT. NO.

> > > > LIKE AN ADAMANT CHILD YOU ARE HOLDING ON TO YOUR

> > > > ARGUMENT AND

> > > > CHANGING THE BIRHT TIME ITSELF. HOW PREPOSTEROUS.

> > > > SORRY BROTHER I CANNOT ARGUE WITH A PERSON WHO

> > > > CHANGES THE LAWS OF

> > > > NATURE.

> > > > RAGARDS

> > > > NOT YOUR ADAMANT BROTHER

> > > > PARTHA

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just

> > $8.95/month.

> > > http://geocities./ps/info1