Guest guest Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 Dear Jaan You have added another dimension to this topic, which I wanted to avoid at this stage, till the previous questions were resolved. However, since u have already brought it up, what u r referring to, is a third dimension, which u will find as follows, if u fully scan CoVA (which I have done): Planets involved in Raj Yogas manifest their karatwas for that RY in the following 3 phases: Plnts in 1/3/7/9= results late in lyf, in 2/4/8/10= early, 5/6/11/12= mid-lyf. Regards Nandan kgrap@btinter net.com vedic astrology cc: 13-11-01 Natural Ages of Planets Re: 17:13 [vedic astrology] Kala amrita yoga !!! Please respond to vedic-astrolo gy Im not sure if the table is actually referring to the natural age of planets but elsewhere in COVA Sanjay Guru refers to the natural age of jupiter as 30, saturn as 36 and rahu/ketu as 43 yrs. When sun is in the 5th house the middle part of life is full of challenges and the best part shall be after 50 years of age. this could support the natural age of sun as 50? im sure there is more but it will take a while to completely scan COVA for such references. love jaan vedic astrology, Nandan.Chakraborty@i... wrote: > > Dear All > > Ref Visti's note with extract of natural ages of planets from CoVA: > 1. Could 82 for St be a printing mistake, as it is the ony one which stands > out oddly? > 2. As per CoVA, these natural ages are meant specifically for exceptional > rise/ fall in fortune, as per strongest planet influencing 9/ L9/ > dispositor of L9/ L10. > 3. Classics mention a completely different set for general use when a > natally signified problem/ solution manifests, as mentioned below (2 > versions, 1st most common, thru most classics, 2nd rare): > |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| > | Ma | Mc | Ve| Jp| Sn| Mn | St | Node| > | | | | | | | | s | > |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| > | Infant| Child/| 16| 30| 50| 70 | 100| 100 | > | / 16 | 20 | | | | | | | > |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| > | | 32 | 25| 16| 22| 24 | 36 | 48 | > |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| > > > > The above are actually questions, not answers, ie I'm also repudiating any > responsibility for further questions on this (I would, if I could ...!) > > Regards > > Nandan Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.