Guest guest Posted November 12, 2001 Report Share Posted November 12, 2001 Dear All Ref Visti's note with extract of natural ages of planets from CoVA: 1. Could 82 for St be a printing mistake, as it is the ony one which stands out oddly? 2. As per CoVA, these natural ages are meant specifically for exceptional rise/ fall in fortune, as per strongest planet influencing 9/ L9/ dispositor of L9/ L10. 3. Classics mention a completely different set for general use when a natally signified problem/ solution manifests, as mentioned below (2 versions, 1st most common, thru most classics, 2nd rare): |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| | Ma | Mc | Ve| Jp| Sn| Mn | St | Node| | | | | | | | | s | |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| | Infant| Child/| 16| 30| 50| 70 | 100| 100 | | / 16 | 20 | | | | | | | |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| | | 32 | 25| 16| 22| 24 | 36 | 48 | |-------+-------+---+---+---+----+----+-----| The above are actually questions, not answers, ie I'm also repudiating any responsibility for further questions on this (I would, if I could ...!) Regards Nandan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.