Guest guest Posted November 6, 2001 Report Share Posted November 6, 2001 Hello, I was just experimenting with the Sudasa worksheet posted on the list. Apparently, there seems to be some mistake with the calculations of Antardashas. The Antardashas should flow in regular order whether they go backwards or forwards i.e Ar/Ta/Ge or Pi/Aq/Cp; they should not follow the rules to calculate the MDs. I am posting a sample chart. While the calculation of MDs seem to be correct, the ADs is clearly wrong. (See attached file: Su-Dasa2.xls) The AD sequence should be: Ta: 07/94 - 05/95 Ar: 05/95 - 03/96 Pi: 03/96 - 01/97 Aq: 01/97 - 11/97 Cp: 11/97 - 09/98 Sg: 09/98 - 07/99 Sc: 07/99 - 05/00 Li: 05/00 - 03/01 Vi: 03/01 - 01/02 Le: 01/02 - 11/02 Cn: 11/02 - 09/03 Ge: 09/03 - 07/04 Best Regards, SA Attachment: Su-Dasa2.xls [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2001 Report Share Posted November 7, 2001 Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha! ------ Dear Sanjiv, There is no error, it was on purpose. This is based on the teachings of Sanjay Rath. Best wishes, Visti. --- Sanjiv Aggarwal/CanWest/IBM <sanjiv wrote: > > Hello, > > I was just experimenting with the Sudasa worksheet > posted on the list. > Apparently, there seems to be some mistake with the > calculations of > Antardashas. The Antardashas should flow in regular > order whether they go > backwards or forwards i.e Ar/Ta/Ge or Pi/Aq/Cp; they > should not follow the > rules to calculate the MDs. > > I am posting a sample chart. While the calculation > of MDs seem to be > correct, the ADs is clearly wrong. (See attached > file: Su-Dasa2.xls) > > The AD sequence should be: > > Ta: 07/94 - 05/95 > Ar: 05/95 - 03/96 > Pi: 03/96 - 01/97 > Aq: 01/97 - 11/97 > Cp: 11/97 - 09/98 > Sg: 09/98 - 07/99 > Sc: 07/99 - 05/00 > Li: 05/00 - 03/01 > Vi: 03/01 - 01/02 > Le: 01/02 - 11/02 > Cn: 11/02 - 09/03 > Ge: 09/03 - 07/04 > > Best Regards, > > SA > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/msexcel name=Su-Dasa2.xls Find a job, post your resume. http://careers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2001 Report Share Posted November 7, 2001 So, is Sanjayji teaching something different than what is preferred (and prescribed??) by Narasimha? If yes, will that mean Narasimha's software may have such discrepancies?? Best Regards, SA Visti Larsen <in_joy_i_scream on 11/07/2001 02:41:18 AM Please respond to vedic astrology vedic astrology cc: Re: [vedic astrology] Error with Sudasa worksheet Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha! ------ Dear Sanjiv, There is no error, it was on purpose. This is based on the teachings of Sanjay Rath. Best wishes, Visti. --- Sanjiv Aggarwal/CanWest/IBM <sanjiv wrote: > > Hello, > > I was just experimenting with the Sudasa worksheet > posted on the list. > Apparently, there seems to be some mistake with the > calculations of > Antardashas. The Antardashas should flow in regular > order whether they go > backwards or forwards i.e Ar/Ta/Ge or Pi/Aq/Cp; they > should not follow the > rules to calculate the MDs. > > I am posting a sample chart. While the calculation > of MDs seem to be > correct, the ADs is clearly wrong. (See attached > file: Su-Dasa2.xls) > > The AD sequence should be: > > Ta: 07/94 - 05/95 > Ar: 05/95 - 03/96 > Pi: 03/96 - 01/97 > Aq: 01/97 - 11/97 > Cp: 11/97 - 09/98 > Sg: 09/98 - 07/99 > Sc: 07/99 - 05/00 > Li: 05/00 - 03/01 > Vi: 03/01 - 01/02 > Le: 01/02 - 11/02 > Cn: 11/02 - 09/03 > Ge: 09/03 - 07/04 > > Best Regards, > > SA > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/msexcel name=Su-Dasa2.xls Find a job, post your resume. http://careers. Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2001 Report Share Posted November 7, 2001 Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha! --- Dear Sanjiv, I believe what Sanjay has taught is a recommendation, from his own experience with Su-dasa. Not exactly sure about the source of this knowledge, but seems to work quite well. I believe Narasimha will give an option for different Sub-Dasa's. Rest is upto you. Best wishes, Visti. --- Sanjiv Aggarwal/CanWest/IBM <sanjiv wrote: > > So, is Sanjayji teaching something different than > what is preferred (and > prescribed??) by Narasimha? If yes, will that mean > Narasimha's software > may have such discrepancies?? > > Best Regards, > > SA > > > Visti Larsen <in_joy_i_scream on > 11/07/2001 02:41:18 AM > > Please respond to vedic astrology > > vedic astrology > cc: > Re: [vedic astrology] Error with Sudasa > worksheet > > > Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha! > ------ > Dear Sanjiv, > There is no error, it was on purpose. > This is based on the teachings of Sanjay Rath. > > Best wishes, Visti. > --- Sanjiv Aggarwal/CanWest/IBM <sanjiv > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I was just experimenting with the Sudasa worksheet > > posted on the list. > > Apparently, there seems to be some mistake with > the > > calculations of > > Antardashas. The Antardashas should flow in > regular > > order whether they go > > backwards or forwards i.e Ar/Ta/Ge or Pi/Aq/Cp; > they > > should not follow the > > rules to calculate the MDs. > > > > I am posting a sample chart. While the > calculation > > of MDs seem to be > > correct, the ADs is clearly wrong. (See attached > > file: Su-Dasa2.xls) > > > > The AD sequence should be: > > > > Ta: 07/94 - 05/95 > > Ar: 05/95 - 03/96 > > Pi: 03/96 - 01/97 > > Aq: 01/97 - 11/97 > > Cp: 11/97 - 09/98 > > Sg: 09/98 - 07/99 > > Sc: 07/99 - 05/00 > > Li: 05/00 - 03/01 > > Vi: 03/01 - 01/02 > > Le: 01/02 - 11/02 > > Cn: 11/02 - 09/03 > > Ge: 09/03 - 07/04 > > > > Best Regards, > > > > SA > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/msexcel > name=Su-Dasa2.xls > > > > > > Find a job, post your resume. > http://careers. > > > Archives: > vedic astrology > > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > || > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > > > Find a job, post your resume. http://careers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2001 Report Share Posted November 7, 2001 Thx. Visti; I was in the process of writing another lengthy mail which I have discarded now. I had done some analysis based on the two ADs; my feeling (from my very basic knowledge of analysing Rasi Dasas) is that I can understand the events a lot more clearly following the ADs calculated by your spreadsheet. Best Regards, SA Visti Larsen <in_joy_i_scream on 11/07/2001 10:40:49 AM Please respond to vedic astrology vedic astrology cc: Re: [vedic astrology] Error with Sudasa worksheet Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha! --- Dear Sanjiv, I believe what Sanjay has taught is a recommendation, from his own experience with Su-dasa. Not exactly sure about the source of this knowledge, but seems to work quite well. I believe Narasimha will give an option for different Sub-Dasa's. Rest is upto you. Best wishes, Visti. --- Sanjiv Aggarwal/CanWest/IBM <sanjiv wrote: > > So, is Sanjayji teaching something different than > what is preferred (and > prescribed??) by Narasimha? If yes, will that mean > Narasimha's software > may have such discrepancies?? > > Best Regards, > > SA > > > Visti Larsen <in_joy_i_scream on > 11/07/2001 02:41:18 AM > > Please respond to vedic astrology > > vedic astrology > cc: > Re: [vedic astrology] Error with Sudasa > worksheet > > > Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha! > ------ > Dear Sanjiv, > There is no error, it was on purpose. > This is based on the teachings of Sanjay Rath. > > Best wishes, Visti. > --- Sanjiv Aggarwal/CanWest/IBM <sanjiv > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I was just experimenting with the Sudasa worksheet > > posted on the list. > > Apparently, there seems to be some mistake with > the > > calculations of > > Antardashas. The Antardashas should flow in > regular > > order whether they go > > backwards or forwards i.e Ar/Ta/Ge or Pi/Aq/Cp; > they > > should not follow the > > rules to calculate the MDs. > > > > I am posting a sample chart. While the > calculation > > of MDs seem to be > > correct, the ADs is clearly wrong. (See attached > > file: Su-Dasa2.xls) > > > > The AD sequence should be: > > > > Ta: 07/94 - 05/95 > > Ar: 05/95 - 03/96 > > Pi: 03/96 - 01/97 > > Aq: 01/97 - 11/97 > > Cp: 11/97 - 09/98 > > Sg: 09/98 - 07/99 > > Sc: 07/99 - 05/00 > > Li: 05/00 - 03/01 > > Vi: 03/01 - 01/02 > > Le: 01/02 - 11/02 > > Cn: 11/02 - 09/03 > > Ge: 09/03 - 07/04 > > > > Best Regards, > > > > SA > > > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/msexcel > name=Su-Dasa2.xls > > > > > > Find a job, post your resume. > http://careers. > > > Archives: > vedic astrology > > Group info: > vedic astrology/info.html > > To UNSUBSCRIBE: Blank mail to > vedic astrology- > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > || Om Tat Sat || Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu > || > > Your use of is subject to > > > > > > > > Find a job, post your resume. http://careers. Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 7, 2001 Report Share Posted November 7, 2001 Dear Sanjiv, > So, is Sanjayji teaching something different than what is preferred (and > prescribed??) by Narasimha? If yes, will that mean Narasimha's software > may have such discrepancies?? > > Best Regards, > > SA Let me just clarify my preference. I have been using the dasa-like antardasas in Sudasa since last April, when Sanjay told me about it. He told me that technically this has no basis, as the only antardasa system taught by Jaimini is the Narayana dasa one. But he said he got better results with it. I was writing my book at that time and avoided antardasas in Sudasa, in order to not teach wrong things. I did not go to the level of antardasas in any Sudasa example in my book. Later I experimented more and accepted Sanjay's teaching, though it does not seem to be sanctioned by maharshis. In Jagannatha Hora, I am giving a lot of options, but did not find it necessary to give an option in Sudasa antardasas. What Sanjay taught (i.e. dasa sign is treated as Sree lagna and antardasas are found just like dasas) is clearly better. I am sorry for any confusion I created by teaching half-baked knowledge a couple of years ago. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2001 Report Share Posted November 8, 2001 Hi, No need for apologies. When somebody credible suggests something and another suggests something else, it is natural to ask for clarification. I would personally like to continue to benefit from your knowledge, thoughts, and revelations. Please do not withhold this treasure. Thanks, SA pvr on 11/07/2001 08:53:14 PM Please respond to vedic astrology vedic astrology cc: [vedic astrology] Re: Error with Sudasa worksheet Dear Sanjiv, > So, is Sanjayji teaching something different than what is preferred (and > prescribed??) by Narasimha? If yes, will that mean Narasimha's software > may have such discrepancies?? > > Best Regards, > > SA Let me just clarify my preference. I have been using the dasa-like antardasas in Sudasa since last April, when Sanjay told me about it. He told me that technically this has no basis, as the only antardasa system taught by Jaimini is the Narayana dasa one. But he said he got better results with it. I was writing my book at that time and avoided antardasas in Sudasa, in order to not teach wrong things. I did not go to the level of antardasas in any Sudasa example in my book. Later I experimented more and accepted Sanjay's teaching, though it does not seem to be sanctioned by maharshis. In Jagannatha Hora, I am giving a lot of options, but did not find it necessary to give an option in Sudasa antardasas. What Sanjay taught (i.e. dasa sign is treated as Sree lagna and antardasas are found just like dasas) is clearly better. I am sorry for any confusion I created by teaching half-baked knowledge a couple of years ago. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.