good explaining(dear sarajit)

[Guest guest]

dear sarajit

you have explained the concepts well. but don't you

think kartheek is asking elementary doubts. he must

learn the concepts well and come to the discussion.

regards

partha

 

--- Sarajit Poddar <sarajitp wrote:

> Hare Rama Krsna

> Dear Kartheek!

>

> First of all the mantra "OM NAMAH SIVAYAH" as you

> wrote needs slight

> modification. This should be "OM NAMH SIVAYA". You

> need not address me with

> Sir!.... Anyway doesn't matter. The flow of language

> speaks more than the

> words themselves....

>

> Your doubt is quite justified. First the question is

> whether all dasas are

> Phalita? No...... There are many dasas such as

> Navamsa, Brahma, Sthira,

> Shoola dasa which are specifically used for Aayu or

> longevity and health. In

> Nakshatra based dasa there are some like Yogini (for

> misfortune) and some

> say Ashtottari is used for this purpose. There are

> many more such as Sudasha

> which shows properity and happiness in one's

> life.....

>

> Why can we take one dasa and see the result from the

> same then? This is

> because the Aayu can be "better seen from the Aayu

> dasa", Vimshottari is

> seen for psychological condition and drives that

> come during a specific

> dasa-antardasa and so on. The physical events or the

> manifestation of the

> events are better seen from the Narayana and not

> Vimshottari. Here we can't

> see one and leave the others. Lets say, you are

> appearing in an exam, you

> might get nervous during the exam and be happy after

> the results are out

> (vimshottari), however, it would be difficult to say

> whether you really

> passed, though we can say something through

> implication. However, Passing

> the exam is an event and can be better shown by the

> Narayana Dasa. There is

> utility for both....... and also others...

>

> When there are dasas which show specific areas of

> one's life why to take a

> generalised dasa and try to interpret the events (I

> don't say it is not

> possible, however I would say that this is

> difficult).

>

> Hope I am clear.

>

> Regards

> Sarajit

>

>

>

>

>

> -

> <kartheekv

> <vedic astrology>

> Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:43 PM

> [vedic astrology] Re: Please help

>

>

> > OM NAMAH SIVAAYAH

> > RESPECTED GURJIS

> > RESPECTED SARAJIT SIR

> > You are so kind. Thank you for giving me useful

> information. But my

> > humble doubt is why there is a nakshatra system

> and a Rasi dasa

> > system. Why can't we use only the one which gives

> accurate results.

> > Aren't all the systems Phalit. then why should we

> use Narayana Dasa

> > and not VImshottari.

> > Yours humble shishya

> > KARTHEEK

> > vedic astrology, "Sarajit Poddar"

> <sarajitp@h...> wrote:

> > > Hare Rama Krsna

> > > Dear Partha!

> > >

> > > Please restrain from issuing such comments (Grow

> up Man!),

> > otherewise you

> > > might be asked to leave this group by the

> administrator.. You have

> > no rights

> > > tell something in someone else's behalf. What is

> the use of

> > discussion if

> > > there is no learning!!!!! Can you justify what

> you said....

> > >

> > > Dear Kartheek

> > > The two are not different system. The system

> which you call the

> > Jaimini

> > > system has the full conformance with the

> Parasari system. What

> > Jaimini did

> > > was to refine the system so that these can be

> better understool we

> > normal

> > > mortals in this Kali yuga, whose intellectual

> levels have detoriated

> > > largely. Study Parasara and you will find many

> things which Jaimini

> > > discussed in his book.

> > >

> > > As of the difference between the Nakshatra dasa

> and Rasi dasa. As

> > the name

> > > suggest one starts from Birth/ Moon/ or some

> other nakshatra and

> > the lords

> > > of the nakshatra indicate the results however,

> the other starts

> > with Rasi

> > > such as Lagna or some other house (based on

> which dasa you are

> > rekoning) and

> > > the results indicated are based on the

> indications of the signs,

> > their

> > > lords, and the planets placed or aspecting that

> sign.

> > >

> > > This the difference in the method of reckoning

> and interpreting.

> > However,

> > > the results shown by these also depend on which

> dasa you are using,

> > aayur

> > > dasa, phalita dasa or some others. Both in

> nakshatra and the Rasi

> > dasas, we

> > > have different dasas indicating different area

> of life and death....

> > >

> > > This is some hints to make to keep going. Revert

> back in case you

> > have some

> > > specif queries.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Sarajit

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > <partvinu5>

> > > <vedic astrology>

> > > Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:33 PM

> > > [vedic astrology] Re: Please help

> > >

> > >

> > > > dear kartheek

> > > > this is a forum for discussion. not learning.

> > > > regards

> > > > partha

> > > > vedic astrology, kartheek

> vinukonda <kartheekv>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > OM NAMAH SIVAAYAH

> > > > > RESPECTED GURUJIS

> > > > > Pranaam

> > > > > Could anyone explain me the difference

> between jaimini

> > > > > system and parasara system. The difference

> between

> > > > > two systems rasi dasa and nakshatra dasas.

> I am a new

> > > > > member.

> > > > > Kind regards

> > > > > kartheek

> > > > >

> > > > > --- vedic astrology Moderator

> > > > > <vedic astrology-owner> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This discussion group discusses the

> principles of

> > > > > > Vedic astrology (Jyotish) and analyzes

> real-world

> > > > > > happenings based on the principles of

> Vedic

> > > > > > astrology. The discussions can range from

> very

> > > > > > simple to very deep.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > A hermitage-like atmosphere of devoted

> learning,

> > > > > > selfless sharing, courtesy and mutual

> respect is

> > > > > > encouraged here. People freely ask very

> basic

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

Make a great connection at Personals.

http://personals.