Guest guest Posted October 31, 2001 Report Share Posted October 31, 2001 dear freinds hindu predictive astrology is a fascinating science and one will find innumerable intances where even the best of astrologers get perplexed due to the intricacies involved. i am not sure if you would agree but there are many schools of thought when it comes to predictions. one school of thought gives a lot of weightage to constellations. now what i mean by this is that planets occupying the different nakshatras are analyzed for predictions. let us take a hypothetical example. jupiter in krittika3rd quarter, saturn in aslesha 2nd quarter and so on. soem astrologers predict according to the placement of planets in particular zodiac signs, go for the divisional charts and give their analysis. but there are a few astrologers whose predictions are based on the constellation theory. like jupiter in krittika gives a fiery, argumentative nature. sun in jyeshtha giving a cruel bent of mind. for hitler moon was in purvashadha thus he had evangelisitic thoughts etc. now to the interesting part. which is the better school or are the both schools two sides of the same coin? comments and controversies are welcome. regards partha sarathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.