Guest guest Posted October 30, 2001 Report Share Posted October 30, 2001 Thomas Beckett, Archbishop of Canterbury - would he be an example of both? - <Nandan.Chakraborty <vedic astrology> Tuesday, October 30, 2001 9:25 AM RY & PvRY v loose terms being used Re: Note on Pravrajya Yogas Re: [vedic astrology] Re: replyfrom partha > > > Dear friends > > I do not think people got the real message of my trying to DIVIDE the > various forms of Pravrajya Yogas. Renunciation of what (various types: > body, ego, material things, lust, etc etc) & seeking what (again various > types: bhakti, gyan, etc). > > Similarly, there are VARIOUS forms of RYs eg fame from GL, 1/5 emanations > etc, wealth from HL, 2 related, etc. > > So it is NOT a either-or thing here, between the 2 loosely termed sets, of > RY & PvRY being mutually exclusive. This convenience of using these 2 terms > for a wide variety of yogas is creating problems in understanding here, I > think. You can have ONE avatar of PvRY & 1 avatar of RY. Or none of either. > > And another point: of course, u need not have PvRY to be spiritual, or RY > to be famous. Didnt Shri Rath say that ONE-THIRD of all your houses, the > Upachayas, are free-will! > > Regards > > nandan > > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.