Narayana Dasa - 144 yrs - Why???

[Guest guest]

Aum Suryaayah Namah,

 

Namaste Majid,

 

I am reproducing a post by Pt. Sanjay Rath in another list below on

the reason why Narayana Dasa Ayus is 144yrs and is constant.

 

WHAT MANOJ WANTS IS THE BASIS FOR THIS 144 YEARS LIKE VIMSOTTARI HAS

A SOUND BASIS FOR 120 YEARS (TRINE FROM ONE BRAHMA NABHI TO ANOTHER).

THE DEFINITION OR UNDERSTANDING OF NARAYANA COMES FROM THE DHYANA

SLOKA .. DHAYET SADA SAVITR MANDALA MADHYA VARTI.. AND SO THE

REFERENCE AND FOCUS IS ON THE SUN AS THE SOURCE OF ALL LIFE. WE ARE

ALSO AWARE OF THE ONE TWELFTH DIVISION OF EACH SIGN WHEREBY EACH SIGN

HAS ONE POTION IN ALL OTHER SIGNS. SUCH A DIVISION IS CALLED SURYAMSA

OR DWADASAMSA. NOW, IF WE TOTAL ALL THE DWADASAMSA IN ALL SIGNS THEN

WE GET 144 WHICH IS THE PARAM AYUS OF THE NARAYANA DASA. FURTHER

SINCE EACH SIGN CAN HAVE ONLY 12 SURYAMSA ITS MAXIMUM PERIOD IS

LIMITED TO 12 YEARS. NOW APPLY THIS TO BOTH VIRGO MERC EXALTED AND

SAG JUP DEBILITATED SITUATIONS. WE HAVE 12 FULL YEARS FOR MERCURY AND

THAT CANNOT BECOME 13 EVEN IF WE WANT TO GIVE IT A YEAR IN ADDITION

FOR ITS EXALTATION (KN RAO FACED THIS PROBLEM WITH HIS OWN CHART AND

HENCE SUGGESTED THE RADICAL REJECTION OF THE SPECIFIC DICTUM RELATED

TO EXALTATION AND DEBILITY). SIMILARLY JUP IN SAGITTARIUS WILL GIVE 2-

1-1=0 YEARS. NOW WE KNOW THAT MANY PEROPLE LIVE BEYOND THE TOTAL OF

THE PERIODS OF ALL 12 SIGNS. THEN WE REPEAT THE NARAYANA DASA AND THE

REMAINING PORTION OF THE DASA IS GIVEN BY EACH SIGN. SO, IN THE

SECOND CYCLE VIRGO WITH MERCURY GIVES 0 YEARS (12-12=0) AND SAG GIVES

A FULL 12 YEARS (12-0=12). THUS YOU WILL SEE THAT NONE OF THE DASA

ARE SKIPPED AND ALL 12 SIGNS GIVE ALL OF THEIR 12 SURYAMSA IN 144

YEARS. TO MY KNOWLEDGE BHAGAVAN SRI KRISHNA IS THE ONLY ONE WHO

STAYED IN THIS PLANET IN ONE BODY FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF THE

NARAYANA DASA I.E. 144 YEARS.

 

Regards

-Narayan

 

 

 

vedic astrology, "Majid" <majid@v...> wrote:

> Namaste!

> Yes you are right about manual calculation I just wanted a

basis for

> understanding and a correct example to work from. The other main

question I

> now have is about Purnayus. It seems the length of Purnayus changes

the DASA

> dates. So what are people using for Purnayus? I have seen many

different

> years for this. Or is this a calculation you make yourself? Charak

uses 100

> years but does not seem to think it very important and Raman has two

> different ones as well.

> Om Sri Ganapati Ki Jai!

> ++++++++++++++++++++++++

> Majid Buell

> Western & Hindu Vedic Astrology

> Qigung Healings & House Qi Clearings