Shri Rath/ Visti: Jatak Parijat Ref anyone, Ref MKS for St

[Guest guest]

Dear Shri Rath, Visti & others

 

I spent 3 hours last evening, trying to locate where the

MaranaKarakaSthans are provided in my 3-vol copy of jataka parijat

(english translation by VS Shastri).

 

Cdnt find it. Anyone there knows where it could be? I tried the

initial planets chapter, the death, longevity, marring of

combinations, ie all the obvious chapters. Other chapters are on the

dasas, etc

 

Or atleast if Gurudev Rath could answer & state that i should not

bother whatever JtkPrjt says (as translated, of course), that he (Mr

Rath) thinks it as Lg & not 8 as MKS for St, ie that it is NOT a

printing mistake in the Narayan Dasa book. That is enuff for me!

 

 

PS Visti: Ref the other matter, I still await my first exercise, when

u get some time. Thanks in advance

 

With best wishes

 

Nandan

 

vedic astrology, "Visti Larsen" <in_joy_i_scream>

wrote:

> Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha!

> -----------

> Dear Nandan,

>

> <1. St's MaranaKarakaSthan: in yr dream-reply e-mail, u mentioned

this as

> Lagna= 1, so does Mr Rath in his new book in Narayana dasa. But my

notes

> from Jatak Parijat & Visti's earlier posting on the same has St's

> mrnkrksthan as 8. There was also a discussion by Visti about how St

in 8 is

> good for longevity but at such high cost, because it is its MKS.>

>

> If you recall the discussions regarding this, Alex and I were in

doubt. I

> don't have Jatak Parijata, so please give the relevant sloka, and

we'll

> analyse it.

>

> 2. Pachaki-Sambandhi: (sneaking this in): Ve's karaka & vedhak are

supposed

> to be Sun & Saturn respectively; however the new Narayan Dasa book

by Mr

> Rath gives it as the opposite, ie St & Sn respectively. I could not

find it

> in VAIP & dont know which classics give it, so I cant check whether

there

> have been any printing mistakes.

>

> I have Sarvatha Chintamani which is the source of this:

> "Pachak, Bodhak, Karka & Vedhak are; Moon, Mercury, Sun & Saturn

> respectively. For Venus, Vedhak is enemical."

>

> However if you analyse these combinations more carefully, one could

be

> convinced to agree with Sanjays list. I hope Sanjay will shed some

light on

> this.

>

> Best wishes, Visti.

> p.s. Do start looking at charts soon.. the wait is unhealthy for an

> astrologer. I'd love to help in this regard, if your willing.

[Guest guest]

Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha!

--------------

Dear Nandan,

Try the chapter on Avasthas.

Best wishes, Visti.

p.s. I'll try sending a simple excercise again to get

you started, but do attempt some of the first lessons

at varahamhira, as they are very simple yet very

important.

--- Nandan.Chakraborty wrote:

> Dear Shri Rath, Visti & others

>

> I spent 3 hours last evening, trying to locate where

> the

> MaranaKarakaSthans are provided in my 3-vol copy of

> jataka parijat

> (english translation by VS Shastri).

>

> Cdnt find it. Anyone there knows where it could be?

> I tried the

> initial planets chapter, the death, longevity,

> marring of

> combinations, ie all the obvious chapters. Other

> chapters are on the

> dasas, etc

>

> Or atleast if Gurudev Rath could answer & state that

> i should not

> bother whatever JtkPrjt says (as translated, of

> course), that he (Mr

> Rath) thinks it as Lg & not 8 as MKS for St, ie that

> it is NOT a

> printing mistake in the Narayan Dasa book. That is

> enuff for me!

>

>

> PS Visti: Ref the other matter, I still await my

> first exercise, when

> u get some time. Thanks in advance

>

> With best wishes

>

> Nandan

>

> vedic astrology, "Visti Larsen"

> <in_joy_i_scream>

> wrote:

> > Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha!

> > -----------

> > Dear Nandan,

> >

> > <1. St's MaranaKarakaSthan: in yr dream-reply

> e-mail, u mentioned

> this as

> > Lagna= 1, so does Mr Rath in his new book in

> Narayana dasa. But my

> notes

> > from Jatak Parijat & Visti's earlier posting on

> the same has St's

> > mrnkrksthan as 8. There was also a discussion by

> Visti about how St

> in 8 is

> > good for longevity but at such high cost, because

> it is its MKS.>

> >

> > If you recall the discussions regarding this, Alex

> and I were in

> doubt. I

> > don't have Jatak Parijata, so please give the

> relevant sloka, and

> we'll

> > analyse it.

> >

> > 2. Pachaki-Sambandhi: (sneaking this in): Ve's

> karaka & vedhak are

> supposed

> > to be Sun & Saturn respectively; however the new

> Narayan Dasa book

> by Mr

> > Rath gives it as the opposite, ie St & Sn

> respectively. I could not

> find it

> > in VAIP & dont know which classics give it, so I

> cant check whether

> there

> > have been any printing mistakes.

> >

> > I have Sarvatha Chintamani which is the source of

> this:

> > "Pachak, Bodhak, Karka & Vedhak are; Moon,

> Mercury, Sun & Saturn

> > respectively. For Venus, Vedhak is enemical."

> >

> > However if you analyse these combinations more

> carefully, one could

> be

> > convinced to agree with Sanjays list. I hope

> Sanjay will shed some

> light on

> > this.

> >

> > Best wishes, Visti.

> > p.s. Do start looking at charts soon.. the wait is

> unhealthy for an

> > astrologer. I'd love to help in this regard, if

> your willing.

>

>

 

 

 

 

Make a great connection at Personals.

http://personals.

[Guest guest]

Dear Nandan,

 

It is inserted in the chapter on Kalachakra dasa, which is near the

end, if my memory serves me correctly.

 

best regards,

 

Alex J

 

 

vedic astrology, Nandan.Chakraborty@i... wrote:

> Dear Shri Rath, Visti & others

>

> I spent 3 hours last evening, trying to locate where the

> MaranaKarakaSthans are provided in my 3-vol copy of jataka parijat

> (english translation by VS Shastri).

>

> Cdnt find it. Anyone there knows where it could be? I tried the

> initial planets chapter, the death, longevity, marring of

> combinations, ie all the obvious chapters. Other chapters are on

the

> dasas, etc

>

> Or atleast if Gurudev Rath could answer & state that i should not

> bother whatever JtkPrjt says (as translated, of course), that he

(Mr

> Rath) thinks it as Lg & not 8 as MKS for St, ie that it is NOT a

> printing mistake in the Narayan Dasa book. That is enuff for me!

>

>

> PS Visti: Ref the other matter, I still await my first exercise,

when

> u get some time. Thanks in advance

>

> With best wishes

>

> Nandan

>

> vedic astrology, "Visti Larsen" <in_joy_i_scream>

> wrote:

> > Vyam Vysadevaya Namaha!

> > -----------

> > Dear Nandan,

> >

> > <1. St's MaranaKarakaSthan: in yr dream-reply e-mail, u mentioned

> this as

> > Lagna= 1, so does Mr Rath in his new book in Narayana dasa. But

my

> notes

> > from Jatak Parijat & Visti's earlier posting on the same has St's

> > mrnkrksthan as 8. There was also a discussion by Visti about how

St

> in 8 is

> > good for longevity but at such high cost, because it is its MKS.>

> >

> > If you recall the discussions regarding this, Alex and I were in

> doubt. I

> > don't have Jatak Parijata, so please give the relevant sloka, and

> we'll

> > analyse it.

> >

> > 2. Pachaki-Sambandhi: (sneaking this in): Ve's karaka & vedhak

are

> supposed

> > to be Sun & Saturn respectively; however the new Narayan Dasa

book

> by Mr

> > Rath gives it as the opposite, ie St & Sn respectively. I could

not

> find it

> > in VAIP & dont know which classics give it, so I cant check

whether

> there

> > have been any printing mistakes.

> >

> > I have Sarvatha Chintamani which is the source of this:

> > "Pachak, Bodhak, Karka & Vedhak are; Moon, Mercury, Sun & Saturn

> > respectively. For Venus, Vedhak is enemical."

> >

> > However if you analyse these combinations more carefully, one

could

> be

> > convinced to agree with Sanjays list. I hope Sanjay will shed

some

> light on

> > this.

> >

> > Best wishes, Visti.

> > p.s. Do start looking at charts soon.. the wait is unhealthy for

an

> > astrologer. I'd love to help in this regard, if your willing.