ADMIN: A warning to all (& Simhasanamsa etc)

[Guest guest]

Namaste Partha,

 

> dear narayan

> i had goen to the archives for amsas . the discussions were really of

> very high order. narasimha guruji and you pointed out that if 2 or

> more planets are placed in shubha amsas(like uttamamsa, gopuramsa)

> then there would be name and fame for that person. you had also

> mentioned that the planets should not be afflicted , combust or

> otherwise. now in my chart from dasa varga analyssi. jupiter is in

> paarvatamsa, mercury in uttamamsa, moon in gopuramsa, saturn in

> gopuramsa, sun in uttamamsa, venus in paarvatamsa. this should be

> very good considering your discussions. but nothing remarkable. sir,

> you have my chart. but any way i will give my details

> pob:delhi

> time: 8 30 am

> date: 15 12 1976

> could you please clear my doubts.

> regards

> partha sarathy

 

You missed the main point. What Parasara said is that the strength of a Raja

Yoga is decided by the amsas occupied by the two planets in raja yoga. For

example, a person with Raja Yoga giving planets in Gopuramsa will be a very

powerful king and a person with two unafflicted planets both in Simhasanamsa

and giving raja yoga will become an emperor. Parasara also taught the

importance of the amsa occupied by the 9th lord.

 

On a quick glance, I did not recognize any standard raja yoga in your chart.

Just planets being in a good amsa isn't enough. Planets should be in a raja

yoga, they should be unafflicted and they should be strong in divisional

charts too.

 

You rarely come across charts satisfying this fully.

 

* * *

 

In another post, all you said was:

 

> dear nandan

> so you are humourous. what do you think i was(angry,

> depressed) . i have made up with visti and he is now

> my great freind. so all your four pillars and so on

> are really theoretical stuff(laughs). but you have

> been kind to give me very good advice. hey man why

> don't you satrt analyzing charts with my chart being

> the first.

> regards

> partha sarathy

 

I want to warn you and others like you to get their act together. I may soon

have to take action otherwise.

 

It's not funny or cute or nice to waste the time of 580 people with an

essentially private *chat* that is not useful to others.

 

People should realize that the world does not revolve around them. Whether

you are angry or depressed or happy is irrelevant to people. They could care

less. If this was a small group comprising 20 people, they could perhaps

afford to care. But, in a group of about 600 people, we can't care about

anything other than the main purpose of the list - astrology. Any mail that

does not have much astrological content is totally unwelcome.

 

There was a time when this list had interesting discussions and atleast one

in ten posts had great value. Archives of past are filled with excellent

information that is not found even in books or magazines. Archives of this

list were an excellent resource for learning.

 

But a few members who have no concern for the quality of the archives and no

common courtesy for the hundreds of other members are reducing the list to a

puerile chatroom. This is unacceptable. Also unacceptable is your (Partha's)

habit of sending each mail twice, possibly with a slightly modified content

(e.g. your above mail on amsas).

 

Before you post anything, ask yourself: "This mail will reach 600 people

immediately and be posted in an archive that may later be referred to by

thousands of people. Is it really worthwhile to take the time of so many

people? Can I serve my purpose by sending this mail to one or two

individuals instead?"

 

Thanks to everyone for their co-operation. There should be no further

discussion of this on the list. I don't want to see mails to the list

agreeing or disagreeing with me. Take any discussion offline.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

List Administrator

[Guest guest]

Would Saturn play a similar role? (It is 9th lord for Taurus Lagna) How

should one consider RYs: using Karka and Rasi Drishti or using kendra,

Trikona lords with the Graha Drishti? The amsas are provided below.

 

(Embedded image moved to file: pic17093.pcx)

 

 

Best Regards,

 

SA

 

 

"Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr on 10/20/2001 05:06:11 AM

 

Please respond to vedic astrology

 

<vedic astrology>

cc:

[vedic astrology] ADMIN: A warning to all (& Simhasanamsa etc)

 

 

Namaste Partha,

 

> dear narayan

> i had goen to the archives for amsas . the discussions were really of

> very high order. narasimha guruji and you pointed out that if 2 or

> more planets are placed in shubha amsas(like uttamamsa, gopuramsa)

> then there would be name and fame for that person. you had also

> mentioned that the planets should not be afflicted , combust or

> otherwise. now in my chart from dasa varga analyssi. jupiter is in

> paarvatamsa, mercury in uttamamsa, moon in gopuramsa, saturn in

> gopuramsa, sun in uttamamsa, venus in paarvatamsa. this should be

> very good considering your discussions. but nothing remarkable. sir,

> you have my chart. but any way i will give my details

> pob:delhi

> time: 8 30 am

> date: 15 12 1976

> could you please clear my doubts.

> regards

> partha sarathy

 

You missed the main point. What Parasara said is that the strength of a

Raja

Yoga is decided by the amsas occupied by the two planets in raja yoga. For

example, a person with Raja Yoga giving planets in Gopuramsa will be a very

powerful king and a person with two unafflicted planets both in

Simhasanamsa

and giving raja yoga will become an emperor. Parasara also taught the

importance of the amsa occupied by the 9th lord.

 

On a quick glance, I did not recognize any standard raja yoga in your

chart.

Just planets being in a good amsa isn't enough. Planets should be in a raja

yoga, they should be unafflicted and they should be strong in divisional

charts too.

 

You rarely come across charts satisfying this fully.

 

* * *

 

In another post, all you said was:

 

> dear nandan

> so you are humourous. what do you think i was(angry,

> depressed) . i have made up with visti and he is now

> my great freind. so all your four pillars and so on

> are really theoretical stuff(laughs). but you have

> been kind to give me very good advice. hey man why

> don't you satrt analyzing charts with my chart being

> the first.

> regards

> partha sarathy

 

I want to warn you and others like you to get their act together. I may

soon

have to take action otherwise.

 

It's not funny or cute or nice to waste the time of 580 people with an

essentially private *chat* that is not useful to others.

 

People should realize that the world does not revolve around them. Whether

you are angry or depressed or happy is irrelevant to people. They could

care

less. If this was a small group comprising 20 people, they could perhaps

afford to care. But, in a group of about 600 people, we can't care about

anything other than the main purpose of the list - astrology. Any mail that

does not have much astrological content is totally unwelcome.

 

There was a time when this list had interesting discussions and atleast one

in ten posts had great value. Archives of past are filled with excellent

information that is not found even in books or magazines. Archives of this

list were an excellent resource for learning.

 

But a few members who have no concern for the quality of the archives and

no

common courtesy for the hundreds of other members are reducing the list to

a

puerile chatroom. This is unacceptable. Also unacceptable is your

(Partha's)

habit of sending each mail twice, possibly with a slightly modified content

(e.g. your above mail on amsas).

 

Before you post anything, ask yourself: "This mail will reach 600 people

immediately and be posted in an archive that may later be referred to by

thousands of people. Is it really worthwhile to take the time of so many

people? Can I serve my purpose by sending this mail to one or two

individuals instead?"

 

Thanks to everyone for their co-operation. There should be no further

discussion of this on the list. I don't want to see mails to the list

agreeing or disagreeing with me. Take any discussion offline.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha

List Administrator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

Attachment: pic17093.pcx [not stored]

[Guest guest]

dear narasimhaji

thank yoou for replying my query. i was a bit confused before last

week. thus i was sending too many mails. my intention was not to hurt

anybody's senibilities.if you had thought that i was acting funny

with nandan then i am sorry. maybe nandan is a good friend of yours.

this i forgot. any way, i was in hospital the whole last week. i

almost died because of very high fever. otherwise i could have relied

to you long ago.

regards

partha sarathy

 

vedic astrology, "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@c...> wrote:

> Namaste Partha,

>

> > dear narayan

> > i had goen to the archives for amsas . the discussions were

really of

> > very high order. narasimha guruji and you pointed out that if 2 or

> > more planets are placed in shubha amsas(like uttamamsa, gopuramsa)

> > then there would be name and fame for that person. you had also

> > mentioned that the planets should not be afflicted , combust or

> > otherwise. now in my chart from dasa varga analyssi. jupiter is in

> > paarvatamsa, mercury in uttamamsa, moon in gopuramsa, saturn in

> > gopuramsa, sun in uttamamsa, venus in paarvatamsa. this should be

> > very good considering your discussions. but nothing remarkable.

sir,

> > you have my chart. but any way i will give my details

> > pob:delhi

> > time: 8 30 am

> > date: 15 12 1976

> > could you please clear my doubts.

> > regards

> > partha sarathy

>

> You missed the main point. What Parasara said is that the strength

of a Raja

> Yoga is decided by the amsas occupied by the two planets in raja

yoga. For

> example, a person with Raja Yoga giving planets in Gopuramsa will

be a very

> powerful king and a person with two unafflicted planets both in

Simhasanamsa

> and giving raja yoga will become an emperor. Parasara also taught

the

> importance of the amsa occupied by the 9th lord.

>

> On a quick glance, I did not recognize any standard raja yoga in

your chart.

> Just planets being in a good amsa isn't enough. Planets should be

in a raja

> yoga, they should be unafflicted and they should be strong in

divisional

> charts too.

>

> You rarely come across charts satisfying this fully.

>

> * * *

>

> In another post, all you said was:

>

> > dear nandan

> > so you are humourous. what do you think i was(angry,

> > depressed) . i have made up with visti and he is now

> > my great freind. so all your four pillars and so on

> > are really theoretical stuff(laughs). but you have

> > been kind to give me very good advice. hey man why

> > don't you satrt analyzing charts with my chart being

> > the first.

> > regards

> > partha sarathy

>

> I want to warn you and others like you to get their act together. I

may soon

> have to take action otherwise.

>

> It's not funny or cute or nice to waste the time of 580 people with

an

> essentially private *chat* that is not useful to others.

>

> People should realize that the world does not revolve around them.

Whether

> you are angry or depressed or happy is irrelevant to people. They

could care

> less. If this was a small group comprising 20 people, they could

perhaps

> afford to care. But, in a group of about 600 people, we can't care

about

> anything other than the main purpose of the list - astrology. Any

mail that

> does not have much astrological content is totally unwelcome.

>

> There was a time when this list had interesting discussions and

atleast one

> in ten posts had great value. Archives of past are filled with

excellent

> information that is not found even in books or magazines. Archives

of this

> list were an excellent resource for learning.

>

> But a few members who have no concern for the quality of the

archives and no

> common courtesy for the hundreds of other members are reducing the

list to a

> puerile chatroom. This is unacceptable. Also unacceptable is your

(Partha's)

> habit of sending each mail twice, possibly with a slightly modified

content

> (e.g. your above mail on amsas).

>

> Before you post anything, ask yourself: "This mail will reach 600

people

> immediately and be posted in an archive that may later be referred

to by

> thousands of people. Is it really worthwhile to take the time of so

many

> people? Can I serve my purpose by sending this mail to one or two

> individuals instead?"

>

> Thanks to everyone for their co-operation. There should be no

further

> discussion of this on the list. I don't want to see mails to the

list

> agreeing or disagreeing with me. Take any discussion offline.

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

> List Administrator