reply from partha(oops parathy)

[Guest guest]

dear ron

i have agreed to the other 'experts' views on VRY. i

agree with you that 3rd cannot participate in VRY as

it is a waek dustahna and in some texts is recognised

as a house of strength , communications which are so

vital.

regards

partha sarathy(oops! parathy)

--- ron wrote:

> Om Krishna Guru

> ---------------

>

> Respected Guruji(s), Expert(s), and friends,

> Pranaam:

>

> Well...

>

> Ironically, after stating the correct rules, I gave

> a wrong chart.

> Sorry. My sincere apologies.

>

> Though I can blame on Retrograde Mercury, or having

> seen too many

> charts in past few days, the fact remains that I was

> wrong and thus

> no excuses.

>

> However, my mistake also prompted me to note that no

> one found out

> the mistake in the first chart [previous mail to

> which this is a

> reply --- see below], or no one bothered to reply or

> correct it.

>

> Well...

>

> After all the hoopla...here is the correct chart for

>

> sample/challenge:

>

> 1) Rising/Ascendant = Virgo or first house

> 2) Sun + Rahu = Leo or 12th house

> 3) Moon + Venus = Gemini or 10th house

> 4) Mars + Ketu = Aquarius or 6th house

> 5) Mercury = Cancer or 11th house

> 6) Jupiter = Sagittarius or 4th house

> 7) Saturn = Aries or 8th house

>

> Now on to...what was the mistake in the previous

> chart that I typed

> hurriedly and without "ojas" :-) :

>

> In previous chart [see below], I stated that Sun +

> Ketu in 6th house.

> However, despite explaining the correct rules of

> Mercury and Venus

> [with their possible placement from Sun], I went

> ahead and put Venus

> in 10th house and Mercury in 11th house!

>

> How could this be possible unless our solar system

> went in to a Break

> Dance Mode? :-D

>

> So now I have corrected the placement of Sun [see

> above] and still

> fulfilled the condition of -

>

> Parivartana Yoga *within* Vipareeta Raja Yoga

> [saturn and Mars].

>

> In any case, please accept my apologies for this

> error. This is the

> second error I made in less than one week. That

> shows bad for a

> Jyotisha [me in this case].

>

> I will try and improve to my best. Sorry.

>

> However, now with the corrected chart [above], the

> challenge still

> remains valid and I would re-iterate that the chart

> given above has

> many strong Yogas [in short, it is not a chart that

> an amateur or a

> novice can easily analyze]. Perhaps, the respected

> Guruji(s) and

> Expert(s) at this list will analyze the sample

> chart. Many thanks in

> advance.

>

> For students and novice/amateur, here are few tips:

>

> When presented with a chart, first try and observe

> the simple rules

> below:

>

> 1) Mercury cannot be more than one sign ahead or

> more than one sign

> behind Sun. Mercury *can* be in the same sign as

> Sun.

>

> 2) Venus cannot be more than two signs ahead or more

> than two signs

> behind Sun. Venus *can* be in the same sign as Sun.

>

>

> Note: The above two rules relate to the fact that

> both Mercury and

> Venus are *inner* planets [compared to our position

> on Earth].

>

> 3) To see the approximate Vedic Month of the chart,

> see the placement

> and position of Sun [with regards to Sign/Zodiac].

>

> 4) To see the approximate Vedic Tithi of the chart,

> see the placement

> and position of Moon [with regards to Sign/Zodiac].

>

> 5) To see the Year of the chart, see the placement

> and position of

> Jupiter [with regards to Sign/Zodiac]. P.s.: This

> also gives the

> approximate decade [especially when observed with

> other key planets

> or nodes like Saturn or Rahu].

>

> 6) To see the Quarter of a Century [roughly 25 - 30

> years out of 100

> years], see the placement and position of Saturn

> [with regards to

> Sign/Zodiac].

>

> 7) To see further in details as to which Century or

> period the chart

> belongs to, calculate the positions of Saturn +

> Jupiter with regards

> to their conjunction in a particular sign.

>

> Meaning...Every 20 years, Saturn + Jupiter will

> conjoin in one of the

> 12 signs.

>

> And so on and on...

>

> Please note that the Nakshatra limbs etc., and the

> combination of

> planets, etc., [as well as avasthas and what have

> you] *precisely*

> determine the chart of a particular time.

>

> Note: The above rules are *particularly important

> when someone give

> you a chart on paper or traditional Janma Kundali,

> etc. [in booklet

> form as used in India]. *

>

> Reason being that most Indians until this date match

> horoscopes

> [Kundali] for marriage etc. And there are many

> wayside astrologers

> who could create a farcical chart just to help the

> bride get out of

> the house and to husband's ;-)

>

> In such cases, knowledge of Navamsa with regards to

> facial features,

> complexion, etc., could be a second advanced

> methodology. But

> well...I am diverting much too far. Sorry.

>

> Perhaps a mandatory ordinance for using Jagannath

> Hora for all charts

> in India [for all horoscopes] should be implemented

> from now-onwards;

> would be a great help [just kidding, though good

> policy].

>

> End-note.

>

> When we research thus, we realize that our Universe

> is truly Unique

> and so are we :-)

>

> Therefore, no two charts [or life forms] can be

> alike. Not even

> twins.

>

> Hope the above helped. I myself am a humble shishya

> [student] as many

> here and find this subject extremely interesting [if

> not mesmerizing]

> :-)

>

> I will also take this opportunity to thank all those

> who have

> contributed to Vipareeta Raja Yoga thread in

> general.

>

> My special thanks go to Doug, Sarajit, Balaji,

> Anand, Parathy, and

> all those whose names I might have left out as I am

> typing this via

> memory only.

>

> Parathy, I am glad that after this discussion, you

> have come to agree

> with the rest of us that it is *not* necessary for

> all three Dusthana

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

Make a great connection at Personals.

http://personals.