Guest guest Posted July 24, 2001 Report Share Posted July 24, 2001 Dear mahalinga Iyer, Just a few points. mahalinga_iyer wrote: >>> Your approach is to learn in a non-critical, accepting way. Mine is based on the belief that what cannot stand critical scrutiny cannot be learned as is. There is room for both our types in this world. Perhaps we each have a littleto learn from one another - being either very critical, or very accepting cannot be very good. I remind you of Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, who urged all spiritual aspirants to test their would-be Guru repeatedly before accepting them. I presume the same can be applied to any guru of astrology, or astrological technique.<<< 1. To me accepting a technique is only when I use it to guide my client. It is a long drawn process and till such time I am convinced about it, the technique is on the experimental table. As far as Moola dasa is concerned I have to know it fully before I decide what to do with it. 2. As far as scrutinising a Guru is concerned, I do not think by merely signing on to this group I have entered into a Guru-Shisya relationship with anyone in particular! 3. As far as my learned colleagues on this list are concerned (who passionately share their knowledge of several years of perseverance), the least I think I can do is Not to burden them with a public scrutiny. Especially since they spare time out of their busy schedules to do a service. My wish is to close this thread here as there is not much of astrlogical content in this, i.e if you agree. Regards viswanadham Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.