Guest guest Posted July 23, 2001 Report Share Posted July 23, 2001 Dear Gurus & friends This is in continuation to my just-sent posting where all the details lie. Ok, maybe all of u think i am being lazy. So, IF u all agree that this current option is a no-no & i need to say something about her marriage, let me tell u my initial attempt. And u will realise why i cant proceed in any confident direction in this divine art called astrology. I am ignoring d-9, undoubtedly important, as I am not confident of the birth time, given the round figure. The only hints I can supply for rectification is that she is very good looking: slim, fair & very finely chiselled features. And her father is a nice man, but a complete (daily) & heavy alcoholic. And the daughter (native) & father dote on each other. Lets take each of the main indicators of marriage/ spouse: I am ignoring for now, (enuff factors already below) 2/8.UL & 8.Lg, which are to do with longevity/ result of marriage. So let me start: Chart : Lg= Li. Occupants in order of houses 1-12 are: -,Glk/ Mndi, 3= A7= A6, Ke/Mc, 5= Aq= A2= Mn/ Sn, Ma, Ve, -, 7= Ar= A5, 8= Ta= UL= A4= A11, 9= AL= GL= HL, Ra, -, 12= A10= StR, JpR. Badhakesh= Sn in 5. 1. Personal planets in general, irrespective of issue being discussed: Both lumes (good lords, of 10/ 11) with most populated sign in 5= Aq, tho Ma is maraka & Ve is OK as L1/8. Only major influence from sign-asp of Ra. Chart seems to revolve around 5= most important ref point in chart. 2. Influences on main indicators delineated: a) 7= Ar= A5: no occupants or planetary asps, sign-aspd & argd by 5 (see "b"). b) L.7 & L.UL= Ma (L2/7) in 5= Aq: has Mn (L10), Sn (L11), Ve (L1/8), no planetary asps, sign aspd by Ra, no args. c) UL= 8= A11= A4= Ta: has no occupts, planetary aspd by Ma (L2/7 in 5= Aq) & JpR (L3/6 in 12= Vi), sign-aspd by Ra (in 10= Cn), no args. d) 7. UL= 2= Sc: occupts Glk/ Mndi, planetry asp by StR (L4/5 in 12), sign-aspd by Ra (in 10= Cn), argd from 4 (= 5= Aq, see "b") & 11 (has StR & JpR in Vi) & no real virodh args. e) Ld.7.UL= Ma (see "b"). f) Ve as general spouse karaka: see "b". Not taking 7 from Ve, as not talking about physical body of spouse here g) Sn/ Ma as specific spouse karaka for females (ignoring as dont know when use vs Ve: if u know, pl advise). h) DK= Jp R (L3/6 in 12= Vi). 3. Now, we are told to see the following for marriage: a) Marriage= 7/ UL/ Ve (gen marriage karaka)/ DK= Jp/ stronger of Ma vs Sn = specific mrg karaka for female. b) Nature/ appearance of spouse= 7/ L7/ (Nvm7 ignored). c) Attractiveness to opp sex & health of spouse= 7.UL & L7.UL. d) Family background of spouse= L.UL. 4. Lets consider only factors of marriage per se (ie 3a). It is obvious from the points delineated under 2, that 2 b is the most important parameter which affects most of these factors under 3a. So the marriage fundas are most affected by 2b. So now, what do i deduce from this info about her marriage ?: a) 5: love-marriage. b) Aq AND Ra's asp, ie Lord's asp (Ra>St) from 11: spouse of different community, not necessarily from foreign land, (as from 11), intelligent spouse, as beneficial Ra (lord asping, & from 11). b)Ma & Ve, strengthened by the strong lumes: lots of passion. Well, thats about the limit that i cd squeeze out of my efforts. So, u see that there is nothing constructive that I can tell my cuzin-in-law. So U all see, that with all this information floating around, how do I deduce anything constructive? what am i doing wrong? More imp, is there anything positive u wish to tell me, that i cd tell her IF i have to say that she shd not go ahead with this match? Regards Nandan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.