Missed some Rules Ref Coalescing Str Rules ...

[Guest guest]

Apologies. Had forgotten to include the latter 1/2 of Strength comparison

Rules from my notes. Continuation of my previous posting of Consolidation

of Strength Rules:

 

1 Jaimini: Comparing str of Planets: Extension of abv: In order of

priority:

a) In sign with larger number of plnts.

b) Based on SECOND: One conjoined/ aspected by more out of certain plnts:

eg for strength of co-lords: Swaami Gurujna Drigyogaha (SGD): (i) Jp (ii)

Mc & (iii) dispositor= strgr. These 3 carry eql wt. Use sign asps. Eg Le &

Aq as 1/7, with Le aspd by Jp & Aq by Mc, & their lords not aspg respective

signs, then tie. When chkg asp of ld/ dispositor, take asp fm either lord

in case of dual lords, but use stronger lord in all other rules.

c) If one of them IS exalted (or in own sign: this, not for node

co-ldship), then he is stronger (opp for deb). Use Ge for Ra & Sg for Ke as

exaltn (opp for debltn)

d) One occupying a sign of higher natural str (Dual>Fixed>Movable).

e) i) for lordship: more adv in deg (fm END of syn fr Ra/ Ke), ii) for

dasa initation: One yielding more dasa years is stronger.

 

Now, specific applications:

 

Comparing strs of Co-Lds fr findg APs, or dasa initiatn: Ra vs St (as ld of

Aq) & Ke vs Ma (as ld of Sc): In order of priority: follwg a, then b, THEN

in the above order.

a) If Jp asps Node (sign asp), it causes its fall, & Ma/ St automatically

becomes the lord rather than the respective Node. Over-rides next.

b) If one lord is in that sign. If so, other ld is stronger. Eg, if St is

in Aq, then invariably Ra should be taken as its lord. Both in syn= obvious

(ie NOT dbl).

 

But: Fr Ra vs Ke in initiatg Mool dasa: if all else fails, "resultg in more

dasa yrs" is not used, instead compare strengths of their dispositors.

 

Comparing for Spl 8 for Rudra: Order: a, c, cjn exalted plnt, rasi aspect

by more plnts, e. But if weaker plnt is afflicted (deb/ enemy syn & cjn/asp

by Ma/St/node), = Rudra instead.