Guest guest Posted July 4, 2001 Report Share Posted July 4, 2001 Dear list members, Many thousands of hours were spent on the issue of determining Jesus Christ birth data and many more hours will be in the future. The major arguments throughout all discussions that truly hold to astrological references were in my opinion NEVER fully presented in a satisfying manner. In order to "add" to this confusion or maybe in order to through some light on it I would like to bring to your attention a site that presents bible discoveries made using the "Codes in the Bible". There is a 5 pages illustrated article, entirely based on the bible codes, concluding that the correct birth date is actually September 11th, 3 BC. Try running a chart for that day (un-rectified, take noon to start with) and see what you get … Link: http://www.ad2004.com/Biblecodes/articles/yeshuabirth1.html Kind regards Jay Weiss > vedic astrology, "Dhira Krsna (das) BCS (Radhadesh - B)" > <Dhira.Krsna.BCS@p...> wrote: > >I took the reference of my information passed through by the > >channelings of Sananda/Jesus Christ about His actual time of birth, > >as I have written before: March 19th, 1 BC just before dawn according > >to Julian calender (you can check > >http://www.geocities.com/dvdd1008/Jyotisha.html). > > Namaste, > > I don´t comment Ayanamsha puzzle, but i don´t agree with Christ´s > birthdata. > > I have seen many dates for Christ, many so called channelled or > whatever and many speculated by actual history. Perhaps there are no > true answer. > > However, based on my knowledge of history and theology with intuition > on astrology, i calculated Christ´s horoscope (1/3/6). That study was > also introduced to finnish theologists a couple of years ago: > > CHRIST > > 01 March, 06 BC, 01:00 AM Local Time, > Bayt Lahm (Betlehem), Israel, 035E12, 31N43. > Time Zone: -00:00. > > AMEN > > Best wishes, > > Mark Kroger > > http://www./list/paramatman-jyotish > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > Jay Weiss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2001 Report Share Posted July 6, 2001 Dear Mark, In research one should use all available avenues. Failing to do so leads to wrong result. This is valid in all walks of life. Your opinion is your own but if you cared to look at the article and treat the bible as a history book you will see that Jesus was born as a Jew and therefore certain event can be traced. BPHS is the bible of most Vedic astrologers. Can we say that it is false ? I guess not, at least on the same level as the bible is. Lastly the bible code is only a few thousands of years old and became available in it's current spread due to the availability of computers. As everything in today's society someone will try to make money of the bible code JUST AS MUCH as of astrology. Regards Jay > vedic astrology, "Jay Weiss" <jayhw@t...> wrote: > > presents bible discoveries made using the "Codes in the Bible". > > There is a 5 pages illustrated article, entirely based on the bible > > codes, concluding that the correct birth date is actually September > > 11th, 3 BC. > > Namaste Jay, > > I know the Bible-codes and i have to say that´s false. The Bible-codes > have nothing to do with reality, it´s only disinformation in this > great Era of new age and hoccus poccus where only money matters. > > Mark > > http://www./list/paramatman-jyotish > > Ps. this world is full of false prophets, see the newest at > > http://www.members.tripod.com/tathagata2000/ > > Unfortunately this man have only an brain-cancer, which creates > hallusinations. > > > > > > > > > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us ....... > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > Jay Weiss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.