Is D-1 a superset (for Mahalinga)

[Guest guest]

Namaste Mahalinga,

 

To further explain the point, I am adding a few sample slokas from

BPHS that demostrate the principle of family members affecting

others' karmas, irrespective of their own chart.

 

It is a principle that the death of a baby is due to the karmas of

the mother, and then later in childhood to the father. That is why

longevity of the child should not be predicted until after 24. It is

not due to his own chart that he may die, but also due to the

parents.

 

In the following yogas, it is shown that someone as distant as the

elder/younger brother of the spouse can be killed by the owner's

chart as a result of marriage.

 

BPHS 94 10. A girl born in Jyeshta Nakshatra destroys (is the cause

of death of) the elder brother of her husband, and a girl born in

fourth quarter of Vishakha Nakshatra destroys (is the cause of death

of) her husband's younger brother. Therefore, a cow should be given

in charity at the time of the marriage of such girls to wipe out the

above mentioned evil effects.

 

BPHS 94 11-13. A boy or girl born in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th quarter of

Ashlesha Nakshatra destroys his/her mother-in-law and a boy or a girl

born in 1st, 2nd, or 3rd quarter of Mula Nakshatra becomes the

destroyer (cause of death of his/her father-in-law. Therefore,

suitable measures, as may be possible within one's means, should be

taken at the time of the marriage of such boys and girls. There will

be no evil effect if the husband has no elder brothers.

 

The yogas are so complex that the cancellation of death of in-laws is

due to the spouse not having an elder brother!

 

All the best,

 

Alex J

 

 

vedic astrology, "Alex J" <lostinmotion@h...> wrote:

> Namaste Mahalinga,

>

> > 2. If we have a unique individual like Rajiv Gandhi (for example),

> > and if we assign one Nadiamsa to him (based on his birth time

> > and known Nadiamsa effects), then we have to assume that he

> > does not share that Nadiamsa with anybody. Because if he did,

> > then that other person with whom he shared the Nadiamsa did

> > not become the PM etc etc, so the Nadiamsa effects did not

> > manifest for that other person! Note that I am not saying

that

> > *only* the Nadiamsa should not be shared, but that we have to

> > essentially assume that nobody else was born within a minute

> > of Rajiv Gandhi in that same place. Can we reasonably make

> > that assumption??

>

> Have you taken into account the effects of the parents charts, and

> other family member charts on the individual? If the parets charts

> promise a powerful child, then they will help to lift up the child.

>

> Likewise the charts of all family members, wife, friends, etc will

> affect the destiny of the person. Similarily the past generations

of

> family, local townsmen, and so on. Even the fate of the country in

> such cases. There are millions of factors externally influencing

the

> chart of the owner through their own karmas.

>

> In this case, even with the same D-300, you will get differing

> results. The DKP distinction is neccessary keeping this in mind.

> There are many yogas that state that someone born of a royal family

> will be a king, while one born ordinary will be merely rich; which

> can be extrapolated to the entire chart. This is one of the reasons

> why.

>

> All the best,

>

> Alex J