a question to Narasimha

[Guest guest]

Dear Narasimha,

 

I am currently going through your book and I wonder about the following:

 

On your example 55, chart 20, you mention Ke pratyantar dasa. Then you refer to Ke as lagna's lord.

However, if you apply the rules in 15.5.1, Ma would be stronger than Ke...

 

Furthermore, if you look at the (2) in 15.5.2, you give an example. To see the

stonger between Ar and Li when Ju is in Ar, Me and Ve in Ta and Ma in Vi. It is

true that Li has spects of both Me and the rasi lord while Ar has only Ju.

However, according the previous rule(1), Ar contains one planet while Li has

none, so Ar must be stronger. So do I miss something or does this rule apply

only when both rasi have planets?

 

Please clarify...

 

Franck

[Guest guest]

Dear Franck,

 

> Dear Narasimha,

>

> I am currently going through your book and I wonder about the

following:

>

> On your example 55, chart 20, you mention Ke pratyantar dasa. Then

you refer to Ke as lagna's lord.

> However, if you apply the rules in 15.5.1, Ma would be stronger

than Ke...

 

Indeed Mars is the stronger lord of lagna and should be used in

finding arudha lagna, Narayana dasa years etc. However, Ketu is also

a lord of lagna.

 

In the case of co-lords, both are lords of the sign. One them is

simply stronger and used for arudhas and dasa years.

 

> Furthermore, if you look at the (2) in 15.5.2, you give an example.

To see the stonger between Ar and Li when Ju is in Ar, Me and Ve in

Ta and Ma in Vi. It is true that Li has spects of both Me and the

rasi lord while Ar has only Ju.

> However, according the previous rule(1), Ar contains one planet

while Li has none, so Ar must be stronger. So do I miss something or

does this rule apply only when both rasi have planets?

 

I should've made it clearer. I was only illustrating rule (2) of

15.5.2 in isolation. Of course, we wouldn't have come to (2) if (1)

resolved the issue! The fact that we came to (2) means that there is

some planet in Li. I only gave the positions of the planets that are

relevant to the application of rule (2), i.e. Jup, Merc and lords of

Ar & Li.

 

So there was another planet in Li. For all you know, Sun and Saturn

may be in Li and Moon may be with Jupiter in Ar. I skipped all the

details irrelevant to the application of (2), as I was illustrating

(2) in isolation/

 

> Please clarify...

>

> Franck

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha