Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Aloha Moses, > were interested first. I also realize that 52 cases is a relatively small > sample size, so i am having these degrees checked with a much larger sample > size using AstroDatabank software. I am glad you realize that. More on this after a little probability analysis... BTW, good luck with your research! > What i used was this: all planets, including outer planets, chiron, the four > major asteroids, all four major angles, the north and south nodes using true > node, the part of fortune using only day-formula calculations, and the > vertex. These are all fairly commonly used in western astrology. Anyone with > one of these placements showing up at least two degrees on either side of the > listed degrees counted for that degree. Thank you for clarifying. Three comments: (1) Let us answer this important question: If we take a *random* degree and see if a body is within 2 deg from it, what is the mathematically expected percentage of positive cases? For each body, you are considering a 4 degree arc (2 deg on either side). The probability that a chosen body is in the arc is 4/360. The probability that a chosen body is NOT in the arc is 356/360, i.e. 89/90. Now the probability that NONE of the 23 bodies listed by you is in the arc is (89/90) power 23. [Note: We are assuming that they are all independent events. So P(A and B) = P(A)xP(B). That is true except in the case of nodes. But, this makes very little difference. The correct calculation actually makes my argument a bit stronger. So don't hold that against my calculations.] It is 0.77. Now the probability that atleast one of the 23 bodies listed by you is within the arc is 1-0.77 = 0.23, i.e. 23%. This means the following: "If you take any *random* degree and see if one of the 23 bodies you listed is within 2 degrees from it, you will get a positive answer in 23% cases on average." Considering that the expected percentage among all people is 23% and that your sample set is really small, 38% concentration at a point or 25% concentration at another point means nothing. Even if your sample set is larger, 25%, 26%, 27% mean nothing (you listed such percentages close to 23). When 23% of all people have a combination, just 25% of all astrologer having it means nothing. If you find 38% concentration at a point with a sample set of 5,000 astrologer charts, THEN it means something though. In any case, realize that the average percentage among all people to expect for any random degree is 23%. Keep that in mind when looking at percentages with astrologers! [Note: I am assuming that you took only 23 bodies that you listed above. If you actually took a few more, the expected percentage will be even higher!] (2) Now, let us say you test on 5,000 cases and really come up with something. That's good. But, is it useful for predictions? No! If a combination is satisfied in 23% of all people overall and in 38% astrologers, you cannot expect a person to be an astrologer just on the basis of that combination. (3) Don't get me wrong. I want to encourage ANY statistical research in astrology. However, studies that are based on intelligent formulations (as opposed to simplistic formulations) and studies that come after reasonable sanity checks are more meaningful and more likely to be *useful*. We are a small community (I mean scientifically oriented astrologers) and we don't want to waste our energy! I request everyone interested in statistical studies to kindly read chapter 33 ("Rational Thinking") in my book "Vedic Astrology: An Integrated Approach" (Sagar publications, 2001). It has some pointers that one should know. An excerpt from it is on my homepage too (http://www.VedicAstrologer.org). In general, if you are a western astrologer with *some* background in Vedic astrology, you should find a lot of real Vedic astrology in my book. If you understand the umpteen building blocks of Vedic astrology clearly, that should also help you in more meaningful statistical researches. Vedic astrology is an extremely refined and vast subject and many western astrologers who think they know Vedic astrology know only a litttttle bit of it. What many western astrologers know of Vedic astrology is only the tip of an iceberg. If you are not interested in deepening your knowledge of Vedic astrology, atleast read chapter 33. It is about statistical research into astrology. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.