Guest guest Posted June 9, 2001 Report Share Posted June 9, 2001 Thanks so much for your help, Narasimha. I was waiting until i got the AstroDatabank info to see if anything actually came up, before checking what the random statistical probabilities would be. But you have helped me to do that, already, and i am grateful for your input. More below... Aloha Moses, > were interested first. I also realize that 52 cases is a relatively small > sample size, so i am having these degrees checked with a much larger sample > size using AstroDatabank software. I am glad you realize that. More on this after a little probability analysis... BTW, good luck with your research! > What i used was this: all planets, including outer planets, chiron, the four > major asteroids, all four major angles, the north and south nodes using true > node, the part of fortune using only day-formula calculations, and the > vertex. These are all fairly commonly used in western astrology. Anyone with > one of these placements showing up at least two degrees on either side of the > listed degrees counted for that degree. Thank you for clarifying. Three comments: (1) Let us answer this important question: If we take a *random* degree and see if a body is within 2 deg from it, what is the mathematically expected percentage of positive cases? For each body, you are considering a 4 degree arc (2 deg on either side). The probability that a chosen body is in the arc is 4/360. The probability that a chosen body is NOT in the arc is 356/360, i.e. 89/90. Now the probability that NONE of the 23 bodies listed by you is in the arc is (89/90) power 23. [Note: We are assuming that they are all independent events. So P(A and B) = P(A)xP(B). That is true except in the case of nodes. But, this makes very little difference. The correct calculation actually makes my argument a bit stronger. So don't hold that against my calculations.] It is 0.77. Actually it's even more than this. The actual arc that i used was five degrees, so it's .725, meaning that 27.5% should be the average. And since the nodes and all four angles are guaranteed to be in different locations, it would actually be a bit higher than this. However, this seems strange to me compared to what seemed to be seeing amongst the charts i looked at, but i'll know more soon. The degree that came up the most in my 52 cases was around 13 Leo, at 49.0%. I'm mainly curious to see if that holds up. The next was around 18 Gemini at around 38.5%. And the next was 17 Scorpio at 36.8%. After doing this, i'll know one way or another, and then i'll be more able to say if there do seem to be some astrological degrees, or padas. I think it would be very good to at least know if this is true, so that we know if there's any point in ever saying that there are such things as astrological degrees, or astrological nakshatras or padas, wouldn't you agree? If i find certain degrees that seem significant, then i would want to check and see which chart placements might be most common in these places. I'm not saying that i would predict an astrologer strictly on the basis of just this degree, but it could be one more piece of evidence to consider. So yes, i do think it could be somewhat useful in prediction, but also useful in other ways. What i'm just as interested in is this: The northern heliocentric planetary node of Neptune is around 12 Leo. If this degree comes up in the tropical system as significant amongst astrologers, for one thing, it could be further evidence as to the validity of the planetary nodes, which are sometimes used within the tropical-western system, and which some, such as Jeff Green and Zip Dobbins, maintain are very important. The next two degrees that i came up with, 18 Gemini and 17 Scorpio, are the northern planetary nodes of Venus and Mercury, respectively. So i am very curious to see if there are somehow statistically significant connections with the planetary nodes, or not. If this is the case, then i think this study just might be an intelligent formulation, complete with a sanity check. thanks again my friend, love and aloha, moses Now the probability that atleast one of the 23 bodies listed by you is within the arc is 1-0.77 = 0.23, i.e. 23%. This means the following: "If you take any *random* degree and see if one of the 23 bodies you listed is within 2 degrees from it, you will get a positive answer in 23% cases on average." Considering that the expected percentage among all people is 23% and that your sample set is really small, 38% concentration at a point or 25% concentration at another point means nothing. Even if your sample set is larger, 25%, 26%, 27% mean nothing (you listed such percentages close to 23). When 23% of all people have a combination, just 25% of all astrologer having it means nothing. If you find 38% concentration at a point with a sample set of 5,000 astrologer charts, THEN it means something though. In any case, realize that the average percentage among all people to expect for any random degree is 23%. Keep that in mind when looking at percentages with astrologers! [Note: I am assuming that you took only 23 bodies that you listed above. If you actually took a few more, the expected percentage will be even higher!] (2) Now, let us say you test on 5,000 cases and really come up with something. That's good. But, is it useful for predictions? No! If a combination is satisfied in 23% of all people overall and in 38% astrologers, you cannot expect a person to be an astrologer just on the basis of that combination. (3) Don't get me wrong. I want to encourage ANY statistical research in astrology. However, studies that are based on intelligent formulations (as opposed to simplistic formulations) and studies that come after reasonable sanity checks are more meaningful and more likely to be *useful*. We are a small community (I mean scientifically oriented astrologers) and we don't want to waste our energy! I request everyone interested in statistical studies to kindly read chapter 33 ("Rational Thinking") in my book "Vedic Astrology: An Integrated Approach" (Sagar publications, 2001). It has some pointers that one should know. An excerpt from it is on my homepage too (http://www.VedicAstrologer.org). In general, if you are a western astrologer with *some* background in Vedic astrology, you should find a lot of real Vedic astrology in my book. If you understand the umpteen building blocks of Vedic astrology clearly, that should also help you in more meaningful statistical researches. Vedic astrology is an extremely refined and vast subject and many western astrologers who think they know Vedic astrology know only a litttttle bit of it. What many western astrologers know of Vedic astrology is only the tip of an iceberg. If you are not interested in deepening your knowledge of Vedic astrology, atleast read chapter 33. It is about statistical research into astrology. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.