Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Hello, I think my learned friend Sri Ashutosh has already replied to your posting with correct arguement. I just want to know, "What is SAMPRADAYIC ASTROLOGY?" Tatvam-Asi , mohan ram <mohanraaam> wrote: > > Dear Members, > > One humble request..... Kindly let us restrict our > analysis to horoscopes using conventional sampradayic > astrological methods in this forum so that it is > informative to the young and aspiring astrologers on > the methodology of astrological analysis. Each > astrologer may derive short-cuts and theories based on > his/her experience with clients. But, these are not > universal truths! Propogating such theories may > confuse young minds. > > Last month we had so many queries about "Why ketu > cannot be an atmaraka?" in which various queries were > raised. Pandit. DAKSHINAMOORTHIJI had made an apt > remark in one of his replies:" We should approach > Rishi vakyas with a reverential frame of mind." A > grasp of the astrological classics should form the > foundation stone for later astrological research. If > we propound new theories and put our views based on > them in these open forums, then young minds are led to > believe that they can try to rationalize ANY theory > irreverentially. They argue saying that each person > is saying different things. The same thing happened > in the discussion regarding placement of lord of > ascendant in 5th house! Luckily Guruji > Dakshinamoorthi stepped in and put things in > perspective quoting authoritatively from BPHS > chapters. We also had a wonderful post from Shri. > Harish in this regard. Posts like these are what will > help aspiring astro-analysts because they impart > traditional knowledge in the course of discussion. > But, if the discussions water down to the level of > acrimoniuos debate, we are doing a disservice to > astrology - the wonderful subject that has been handed > over to us by Rishis due to their overwhelming concern > for us. > > Ofcourse, you are free to devise your own methods for > analysis and use them in your practise. Having your > strong foundation in astrological classics, you will > know how to apply the rules instinctively. But, > inexperienced astrologers may get confused as to which > is original astrology and what is the new theory > leading them nowhere ultimately. > > I mean no disrespect to any one when I write this. > Obviously the writer propounding "Rahu-centric theory" > seems to be a well-read expert. I am sorry if I have > hurt someone. I just stated my sincere opinion in this > regard. > --- tatvam asi <om_tatsat_om> wrote: > > > > > Hello Sunil, > > Your chart has placement of a planet that , in my > experience has been seen to delay the marriage > unduely. > > "Bhava Nasha Karo Jeeva"...is a dictum. > > Meaning, Guru destroys the bhava it is placed in. > > In your case, Guru has spoiled your shaiya Sukha > sthana..meaning conjugal happiness. > Also, I see Ketu in Upappada Lagna in Dhanur which > diminishes /delays marriage prospect. (You have an > adverse effect of Multiple Rahus). > > Coming to most favourable period when you are likely > to get married, using my method of Rahu centric HP > Theory, > This period starts during second half of 2006 in Budha > dasa,Chandra Bhukti and Rahu Pratyantara. > This period is during September to November. > Some developments will start from August itself. > > Your future bride is likely to have more number of > Mausis. (3 TO 4) and may be the last child. Her father > may be no more or will be a man of moderate means with > sickly disposition. > This is a general guide line . > > I will suggest you simple things to do if you are > interested. > Please send me a personal mail. > > Tatavam-Asi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.