Chart of Hanuman (incomplete,may be impossible)

[Guest guest]

Dear friend,

 

Thanks for your post. Yes it is diffilult to complete the chart!

I have used what is available to join 2-3 bits; thats all!

 

To be frank, no historian accepts that Ramayana is a part of

Indian history, but a 'just' a story of religious interest.

Same was the case even with Mahabharata until Dr. S.R. Rao of

the Marine Archaeology Unit of the National Institute of

Oceanography of India, started proving it to be a history!

 

Yet, with modern astronomical technics and software available,

many have successfully dated Mahabharata and also Ramayana.

Though there are different versions of epic available, the

Valmiki Ramayana, the oldest of them is held with reverence.

Even though some 'local hands' can do some mischiefs like

addition,deletion or correction here and there, the facts

of ASTROLOGY and ASTRONOMY are the least touched upon. Such

fake documents can not be easily created if one is not a

learned astrologer/astronomer and knows every little detail!

 

Even there are people who quote Ramayana, Bharata from memory!

The Vedic culture was Guru-Shishya Parampara with Oral and

by heart methods of teaching. That is the reason we saved

Vedas as they were! So, though I believe there are 'defects'

in epic texts available, the astronomical observation can

still be believed. It does not mean that we must accept all

that is there in the book; but that is the first step to know

the truth!

 

These links may prove helpful:

http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/ramayan/rama_vartak.html

 

http://www.geocities.com/vijayabalak/mahabharatha/yearone.htm

 

yours humbly

KAD

 

 

 

, "r.sathyanarayana sharma"

<rssharmabza> wrote:

> sri kadrudra

> Namaste. Your assumed analysis of Lord Hanuman's chart

> is excellent, fixing his birth day as Margasira

> Amavasya with Moola star. The possibility of a solar

> eclipse on that day tallying it with the episode of

> Hanuman trying to swallow Sun is straight and simple.

> Your explanation of the various factors corelating

> astrology with puranic lore is praiseworthy.

>

> However the bitter obstacle is that we are in Kaliyuga

> and cannot know his birthchart which happened in

> tretayuga. As you know the available birth chart of

> rama is a controversial one, owing to the confusion on

> the theory of yugas.Evidently the chart of Lord Rama

> is cast for some BC date mostly falling in Dwapara

> yuga which is not correct.

>

> with such a confusion, i think it is not possible to

> accurately draw the chart of Hanuman or even Rama.May

> i know what is your opinion on this point?

> regards

> satya.

>

> --- kadrudra <kadrudra> wrote:

>

> > Dear friend,

> > According to reliable sources, the following can be

> > found

> > wrt birth of Hanuman:

> > 1.Hanuman was born on chaitra aShTamI on a

> > Tuesday(North Indian

> > belief).

> > This does not clarify whether it is shukla or

> > krishna

> > paksha of the month chaitra and these two

> > possibilities

> > indicate two probable position for Chandra - ARIDRA

> > in

> > bright half and MOOLA in the dark half of the

> > month.

> >

> > 2.Hanuman was born on margashira krishna

> > trayodashI(South India).

> > This is clear cut wrt tithi - dark 13th day of the

> > month

> > margashira and nakshatra as Anuradha/JyeShTha/Moola

> > the

> > corresponding star. This view seems to believe in

> > Moola;

> > This was perhaps the end of 13th day since at

> > Amavasya,

> > Surya would be in PoorvashaDha and Chandra in MOOLA

> > then

> > would result in 14th dark and amavasya day.

> >

> > 3.Hanuman was born on amavasya of

> > margashira(Dravidian view).

> > This looks to be fairly better than case #2 giving

> > MOOLA

> > as the birth star precisely.

> >

> > 4.Hanuman was born on chaitra poornima day(Vaishnava

> > view)

> > This, is clear wrt star - SWATI, rarely the end of

> > CHITTA

> >

> > Now let us analyse the reason behind the 4 possible

> > stars ie

> > Aridra, Swati, JyeShTha and Moola, keeping aside the

> > rarer

> > possibilities of Chitta, Anuradha or PoorvaShaDha.

> >

> > Aridra - lord of which is Rudra, is a valid janma

> > taara for

> > Hanuman, who was believed to be born from

> > 'Rudramsha'.

> >

> > Swati - lord of which is VAAYU, is much stronger

> > candidate

> > for the janmataara of Vaayuputra the son of Wind

> > God!

> >

> > JyeShTha - whose lord is Indra, is a weaker

> > candidate and

> > might be a valid star due to his strength equal to

> > Indra.

> > It may also be due to Vajra-deha of Hanuman whose

> > name

> > 'Hanumaan'(One with swollen cheeks) is due to

> > Indra's

> > Vajra-strike on his face.

> >

> > Moola - The star indicated in 3 out of 4 cases.

> > - The star of the Origin or the seat of Brahma, is

> > the

> > valid star for Hanuman who is believed to be the

> > SECOND BRAHMA.

> > - Hanuman had early separation from parents, which

> > is

> > an indication of Moola.

> > - Thirdly, Dhanu Rashi is the 6th(Servant) from

> > Rama's

> > Kataka Rashi and is well related.

> > - The first Drekkana of Dhanu corresponding to

> > Moola is

> > well described for its 'speed' and 'ear rings',

> > which

> > beautifully suit with Hanuman's speed and

> > ear-rings.

> > (seen only by Rama, at their first meet -

> > Ramayana)

> >

> > A SPECIAL POINT:

> > As soon as he was born, Hanuman, jumped to sky to

> > swallow the Sun himself mistaking for a fruit.

> > This

> > incident, along with other factors, seems to

> > describe

> > a solar eclipse on that day, astronomically. The

> > story

> > is - Indra hit Hanuman on his mouth with Vajra

> > when

> > Hanuman tried to swallow the Sun and got the Sun

> > free.

> > ie Kethu(lord of Moola) tried to capture the Sun

> > and

> > gave up in presence of Indra(lord of JyeShTha)!!!

> > To me, it looks like a wonderful explanation of

> > a partial solar eclipse in Moola, which is next to

> > JyeShTha. The month was margashira and the day

> > MUST

> > have been Amavasya for Surya-GrahaNa by Kethu.This

> > strengthens MOOLA to be his janmataara!! And

> > margashira

> > Amavasya as his birthday. As the time was at Sun

> > rise,

> > Lagna would be Dhanu, without doubt with Ravi,

> > Chandra

> > Kethu there!

> >

> > Though incomplete, hope you get a glimpse of a part

> > of the

> > chart of Hanuman!

> >

> > yours humbly,

> > KAD

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , "hari"

> > <moonlight_180>

> > wrote:

> > > , "hari"

> > <moonlight_180>

> > > wrote:

> > > > Hello,

> > > >

> > > > Does anyone who have analized the lord hanuman

> > chart.

> > > > I want to see the chart.lord hanuman is know to

> > 'chiranjeevi'(no

> > > death).

> > > > I want to see how the chart looks.I saw lord

> > rama chart but not

> > lord

> > > > hanuman.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Hari.

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> ________

> India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Go to

http://.shaadi.com