Guest guest Posted November 5, 2004 Report Share Posted November 5, 2004 Dear friends, Since there is quite a bit of discussion on Narasimha, I'm reposting this article, which I wrote and posted on a religious group pertaining to Sri Vaishnavism on Tue, Jul 20, 2004. *** Audaaryam Of Lakshmi Nrisimhan The July 2004 English Edition of Sri Nrisimhapriya describes "Audaaryam" as the quality of not being satisfied even after giving enormously to the needy person. This is a quality of Sriman Narayana, which has been extoled by great acharayas like Ramanajucharya and Desikacharya. One naturally wonders--which among the Lord's great avatars has this quality to the maximum extent possible? The forgiving Rama and the mischievous Krishna come immediately to mind, but this grand credit should ultimately go to Lakshmi Nrisimhan and Lakshmi Nrisimhan alone, because only He had the magnanimity to practice this towards a terrible sinner like Hiranyakashipu. Such was Nrisimha's benevolence that He even treated Hiranyakashipu, the mortal enemy of His dear devotee Prahalada, with a great deal of kindness, albeit of a very different kind. God is usually amenable to the wishes of devotees and not to the desires of sinners, but such was Nrisimha's greatness that the moment Hiranyakashipu hit the pillar, He emerged. While one eye looked at Hiranyakashipu was like the sun and the other one which looked at Prahalada was like the moon, we must understand that both the sun and the moon shower their benevolence on us in different ways. Another act of kindness of Nrisimhan was allowing Hiranyakashipu to perceive Him in the form of the attractive and terrible Man Lion. According to the Nrisimhan Poorva Thaapini Upanishad, Vishnu initially appeared before Brahma as Nrisimhan and gave him the Mantra Nrisimhan Anushtup with which Brahma was able to create the Vedas. Such was Nrisimha's greatness that He showed the same great form to both Prahalada and Hiranyakashipu! Some say that Nrisimhan did not use weapons because of Brahma's boons to Hiranyakashipu, but is it possible that the Supreme Nrisimhan, who is the father of Brahma, should be bound by Brahma's word? No! The greatness of Nrisimhan was that He wanted to use the divine touch of His adorable and terrible hands to personally rid Hiranyakashipu of his sins, without Hiranyakashipu asking for forgiveness. Think about it--there was no place where Hiranyakashipu's request to Brahma said that he should be killed by being placed on somebody's lap. Nrisimhan could have merely lifted Hiranyakashipu and squeezed the life out of him in the doorway, thus fulfilling Brahma's conditions, but this was contrary to His kind attitude. Therefore, Nrisimhan placed Hiranyakashipu on His lap--a fortune that was not bestowed even on Brahma, and which would be granted to even Prahalada only a little later--and rid him of his sins. Nrisimhan could have killed Hiranyakashipu by merely squeezing his neck, but He tore apart the adamantine chest of Hiranyakashipu with His glorious nails to rid the evil demon of all the sins accumulated over a great period of time. In fact, such was Nrisimha's greatness that He, disregarding the fact that a corpse is impure, still adored Himself with Hiranyakashipu's intestines in the same way that lesser Gods are adored with mere lotuses! So far, we have merely dealt with Nrisimha's great kindness to the evil Hiranyakashipu. But, even after doing so much, such was His Audaaryam that He was not satisfied. So much so that, when Prahalada begged forgiveness for his father after his death, Nrisimhan said that the moment Prahalada was born to Hiranyakashipu, Hiranyakashipu was forgiven of all sins along with 21 previous generations. The Srimad Bhagavata Mahapurana printed by Gita Press, Gorakhpur (IV English Edition, 1997) says that Hiranyakashipu, the son of Kashyapa, the progeny of Marici, the mind-born creation of Brahma, was merely in the third generation from Brahma. This implies that all of Hiranyakashipu's ancestors, stretching back to the previous Kalpa, were forgiven, without asking for it. Even Brahma, who was quaking in a corner with fear because it was his fault granting the terrible boons to Hiranyakashipu, was forgiven by Nrisimhan, without asking. While Rama and Krishna are seen as benevolent forms of Vishnu, Rama offered sharanagati to Vibeeshana only after the latter approached Him, and this included Vibeeshana, and not others. Krishna forgave Indra in the episode of the lifting of the mountain, but only after Indra expressly sought forgiveness. Both these Gods, though valorous, used long-range weapons like bows and the discus to kill their enemies. They thus lacked the personal touch of Nrisimhan. This is the grand Audaaryam of Nrisimhan. He treats even terrible sinners like Hiranyakashipu with a kindness that is not deserved. He therefore is the sole refuge, and though He has a terrible and fierce form, His capacity for forgiveness is a thousand times greater than that of the other avatars of Vishnu. Nrisimhan was not happy merely protecting Prahalada. His immense capacity for Audaaryam was only partially satisfied after He granted so much on Hiranyakashipu and his ancestors, all without anybody asking for it. As a final argument, Rama and Krishna, though divine, were born of humans like Devaki and Kausalya, after much prayer. The humble rock pillar in Hiranyakashipu's palace was not even perhaps aware of the existence of Vishnu. Yet, Nrisimhan, in His kindness, emerged from it as from a womb, and granted the unassuming lump of dead rock the privilege of becoming Brahma's grandmother! Such is Nrisimha's Audaaryam that even other avatars of Vishnu--who had the privilege of living for a long time on Earth--cannot match even a billionth of it! ===== Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs Editor, The Partial Art of Detection ===== Check out the new Front Page. www. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 6, 2004 Report Share Posted November 6, 2004 Dear Balaji, I heard the first deity in Jaganat Puri was Sri Narisimhadev and later Sri Jagannath. Jai Lakshmi Nrisimhan ! best regards Shad , Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji> wrote: > Dear friends, > > Since there is quite a bit of discussion on Narasimha, I'm > reposting this article, which I wrote and posted on a religious > group pertaining to Sri Vaishnavism on Tue, Jul 20, 2004. > > *** > > Audaaryam Of Lakshmi Nrisimhan > > The July 2004 English Edition of Sri Nrisimhapriya describes > "Audaaryam" as the quality of not being satisfied even after > giving enormously to the needy person. This is a quality of > Sriman Narayana, which has been extoled by great acharayas like > Ramanajucharya and Desikacharya. > > One naturally wonders--which among the Lord's great avatars has > this quality to the maximum extent possible? The forgiving Rama > and the mischievous Krishna come immediately to mind, but this > grand credit should ultimately go to Lakshmi Nrisimhan and > Lakshmi Nrisimhan alone, because only He had the magnanimity to > practice this towards a terrible sinner like Hiranyakashipu. > Such was Nrisimha's benevolence that He even treated > Hiranyakashipu, the mortal enemy of His dear devotee Prahalada, > with a great deal of kindness, albeit of a very different kind. > > God is usually amenable to the wishes of devotees and not to the > desires of sinners, but such was Nrisimha's greatness that the > moment Hiranyakashipu hit the pillar, He emerged. While one eye > looked at Hiranyakashipu was like the sun and the other one > which looked at Prahalada was like the moon, we must understand > that both the sun and the moon shower their benevolence on us in > different ways. > > Another act of kindness of Nrisimhan was allowing Hiranyakashipu > to perceive Him in the form of the attractive and terrible Man > Lion. According to the Nrisimhan Poorva Thaapini Upanishad, > Vishnu initially appeared before Brahma as Nrisimhan and gave > him the Mantra Nrisimhan Anushtup with which Brahma was able to > create the Vedas. Such was Nrisimha's greatness that He showed > the same great form to both Prahalada and Hiranyakashipu! > > Some say that Nrisimhan did not use weapons because of Brahma's > boons to Hiranyakashipu, but is it possible that the Supreme > Nrisimhan, who is the father of Brahma, should be bound by > Brahma's word? No! The greatness of Nrisimhan was that He wanted > to use the divine touch of His adorable and terrible hands to > personally rid Hiranyakashipu of his sins, without > Hiranyakashipu asking for forgiveness. > > Think about it--there was no place where Hiranyakashipu's > request to Brahma said that he should be killed by being placed > on somebody's lap. Nrisimhan could have merely lifted > Hiranyakashipu and squeezed the life out of him in the doorway, > thus fulfilling Brahma's conditions, but this was contrary to > His kind attitude. Therefore, Nrisimhan placed Hiranyakashipu on > His lap--a fortune that was not bestowed even on Brahma, and > which would be granted to even Prahalada only a little > later--and rid him of his sins. > > Nrisimhan could have killed Hiranyakashipu by merely squeezing > his neck, but He tore apart the adamantine chest of > Hiranyakashipu with His glorious nails to rid the evil demon of > all the sins accumulated over a great period of time. In fact, > such was Nrisimha's greatness that He, disregarding the fact > that a corpse is impure, still adored Himself with > Hiranyakashipu's intestines in the same way that lesser Gods are > adored with mere lotuses! > > So far, we have merely dealt with Nrisimha's great kindness to > the evil Hiranyakashipu. But, even after doing so much, such was > His Audaaryam that He was not satisfied. So much so that, when > Prahalada begged forgiveness for his father after his death, > Nrisimhan said that the moment Prahalada was born to > Hiranyakashipu, Hiranyakashipu was forgiven of all sins along > with 21 previous generations. > > The Srimad Bhagavata Mahapurana printed by Gita Press, Gorakhpur > (IV English Edition, 1997) says that Hiranyakashipu, the son of > Kashyapa, the progeny of Marici, the mind-born creation of > Brahma, was merely in the third generation from Brahma. This > implies that all of Hiranyakashipu's ancestors, stretching back > to the previous Kalpa, were forgiven, without asking for it. > Even Brahma, who was quaking in a corner with fear because it > was his fault granting the terrible boons to Hiranyakashipu, was > forgiven by Nrisimhan, without asking. > > While Rama and Krishna are seen as benevolent forms of Vishnu, > Rama offered sharanagati to Vibeeshana only after the latter > approached Him, and this included Vibeeshana, and not others. > Krishna forgave Indra in the episode of the lifting of the > mountain, but only after Indra expressly sought forgiveness. > Both these Gods, though valorous, used long-range weapons like > bows and the discus to kill their enemies. They thus lacked the > personal touch of Nrisimhan. > > This is the grand Audaaryam of Nrisimhan. He treats even > terrible sinners like Hiranyakashipu with a kindness that is not > deserved. He therefore is the sole refuge, and though He has a > terrible and fierce form, His capacity for forgiveness is a > thousand times greater than that of the other avatars of Vishnu. > Nrisimhan was not happy merely protecting Prahalada. His immense > capacity for Audaaryam was only partially satisfied after He > granted so much on Hiranyakashipu and his ancestors, all without > anybody asking for it. > > As a final argument, Rama and Krishna, though divine, were born > of humans like Devaki and Kausalya, after much prayer. The > humble rock pillar in Hiranyakashipu's palace was not even > perhaps aware of the existence of Vishnu. Yet, Nrisimhan, in His > kindness, emerged from it as from a womb, and granted the > unassuming lump of dead rock the privilege of becoming Brahma's > grandmother! > > Such is Nrisimha's Audaaryam that even other avatars of > Vishnu--who had the privilege of living for a long time on > Earth--cannot match even a billionth of it! > > > ===== > Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm > Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs > Editor, The Partial Art of Detection > ===== > > > > > > Check out the new Front Page. > www. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.