MAHA MRITYUNJAYA Mantra - here is the answer!!

[Guest guest]

Dear ALL,

 

SUB: Discrepancy in MahaMrityunjayaMantra(MMM)?

 

This is a wonderful example to prove the necessity of proper study

of a MANTRA. In MMM, the lines which one feels different from other

texts, is ACTUALLY THE SAME!

 

"...Urvaarukamiva bandhananmrityormuksheeya....." when split looks

like this(ie in Vedic PADA PAATHA):

 

......Urvaarukam iva BANDHANAAT mrityoh muksheeya.....

 

BANDHANAAT + MRUTYOH = BANDHANAANMRUTYOH -> ANUNAASIKA SANDHI.

It is simple Sanskrit grammar saying T + M = NM in pronunciation.

 

So, in mantra, it has become bandhaNAAN in vedic SAMHITAA PAATHA,

but actually is bandhaNAAT in Vedic PADA PAATHA. So if you are

pronouncing faster continuously, it is BANDHANAAN or if you

pronounce slowly in PADA style, it is BANDHANAAT. BOTH ARE CORRECT!

If it is for Japa, use the fast style as per RIGVEDA and for HOMA or

YAJNA, it is slower as per YAJURVEDIC style. Sometimes depends on

the school of study too.

 

Perhaps now some may understand WHY I stress all to know A to Z of

Mantras. Simply complaining about not getting results or about BACK-

FIRING(!) is of no use unless one KNOWS everything about what he/she

does. There are some hurdles for many mantras - even after doing

japa for 9 lakh times siddhi would not be there(not MMM) as Lord

Shiva says NAVALAKSHAM PRAJAPTVAAPI TASYA VIDYAA NA SIDHYATI..!

So let us try to know more about what we are doing than simply

following blindly.

 

LASTBIT of grammar: In SHAD's message, translation is BANDHANAAN

(accusative case of noun - dwiteeya vibhakti) but actually it is

BANDHANAAT(Ablative case - panchami vibhakti) in tone with Mrityoh

(abl case).

 

yours humbly,

KAD

 

 

 

 

, pankaj sharma

<astrologerpankaj> wrote:

>

>

> Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000> wrote:~ Om Namah Shivaya ~

>

> Dear Bharat,

>

> It is "Bandhnaan" and not "bandhanat", i have several

> books on mantra shastra, also it is given bandhnaan in

> shiva purana.

>

> I am doing this mantra for over a year or so.

>

> Their might be mistake in the cassette.

>

> Regards,

>

> Neeraj

> --- Tanvir <ultimate@s...> wrote:

>

> > To the best of my knowledge, it is "Bandhanan". The

> > page

> > http://www..org/mantra/mritunjay.htm

> > gives very detailed info on this mantra.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > What can not happen, can never happen.

> > Which is mine, is forever mine.

> >

> > http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology

> > (Jyotish)

> > Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful

> > problem solving remedies

> >

> >

> > -

> > Bharat.s

> >

> > Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:24 PM

> > Discrepancy regarding MAHA

> > MRITYUNJAYA Mantra

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Hi guys!

> >

> >

> >

> > I am Bharat from Bangalore.I recently bought the

> > "Maha Mrityunjaya Mantra" released by "Times Music".

> > According to the cassette the mantra goes like

> > this---

> >

> >

> >

> > (Om) Tryambakam yajamahe shugandhim pushti

> > vardhanam

> > Urvaarukamiva bandhanat-mrityur-mukshiya mamritat

> >

> >

> >

> > But in the jyotish-remedies website the mantra

> > goes like this---

> >

> >

> >

> > (Om) Tryambakam yajamahe shugandhim pushti

> > vardhanam

> > Urvaarukamiva bandhanan-mrityur-mukshiya mamritat

> >

> >

> >

> > As you can see there is a discrepancy in the word

> > bandhanat and bandhanan.

> >

> >

> >

> > I just wanted to know which one of them is

> > correct. If anyone can clarify my doubt ,please

> > reply to the ID or to

> > bharat_bgl

> >

> >

> >

> > Thanks a lot!

> >

> >

> >

> > Bye,

> >

> > Bharat

> >

> >

> > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > removed]

> >

> >

>

>

> =====

> http://www.neerajgupta.com

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

>

>

> Sponsor

> Will you help a needy child?

> ·It only costs .60¢ a day · It's easier than you think.·Click here

to meet a waiting child you can sponsor now.

>

>

> Links

>

>

> /

>

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.

>

>

>

> Dear friends,

>

> In some citations I have come across Bandanam instead of bandanan

>

> Love

>

> Pankaj Sharma

>

> India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Kadruda:

 

Here is an excellentt website that gives a very excellent sanskit

pronounciation:

 

http://swamij.com/mahamrityunjaya.htm

 

 

 

, "kadrudra" <kadrudra>

wrote:

>

> Dear ALL,

>

> SUB: Discrepancy in MahaMrityunjayaMantra(MMM)?

>

> This is a wonderful example to prove the necessity of proper study

> of a MANTRA. In MMM, the lines which one feels different from

other

> texts, is ACTUALLY THE SAME!

>

> "...Urvaarukamiva bandhananmrityormuksheeya....." when split looks

> like this(ie in Vedic PADA PAATHA):

>

> .....Urvaarukam iva BANDHANAAT mrityoh muksheeya.....

>

> BANDHANAAT + MRUTYOH = BANDHANAANMRUTYOH -> ANUNAASIKA SANDHI.

> It is simple Sanskrit grammar saying T + M = NM in pronunciation.

>

> So, in mantra, it has become bandhaNAAN in vedic SAMHITAA PAATHA,

> but actually is bandhaNAAT in Vedic PADA PAATHA. So if you are

> pronouncing faster continuously, it is BANDHANAAN or if you

> pronounce slowly in PADA style, it is BANDHANAAT. BOTH ARE CORRECT!

> If it is for Japa, use the fast style as per RIGVEDA and for HOMA

or

> YAJNA, it is slower as per YAJURVEDIC style. Sometimes depends on

> the school of study too.

>

> Perhaps now some may understand WHY I stress all to know A to Z of

> Mantras. Simply complaining about not getting results or about

BACK-

> FIRING(!) is of no use unless one KNOWS everything about what

he/she

> does. There are some hurdles for many mantras - even after doing

> japa for 9 lakh times siddhi would not be there(not MMM) as Lord

> Shiva says NAVALAKSHAM PRAJAPTVAAPI TASYA VIDYAA NA SIDHYATI..!

> So let us try to know more about what we are doing than simply

> following blindly.

>

> LASTBIT of grammar: In SHAD's message, translation is BANDHANAAN

> (accusative case of noun - dwiteeya vibhakti) but actually it is

> BANDHANAAT(Ablative case - panchami vibhakti) in tone with Mrityoh

> (abl case).

>

> yours humbly,

> KAD

>

>

>

>

> , pankaj sharma

> <astrologerpankaj> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Neeraj Gupta <gupta_neeraj_2000> wrote:~ Om Namah Shivaya ~

> >

> > Dear Bharat,

> >

> > It is "Bandhnaan" and not "bandhanat", i have several

> > books on mantra shastra, also it is given bandhnaan in

> > shiva purana.

> >

> > I am doing this mantra for over a year or so.

> >

> > Their might be mistake in the cassette.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Neeraj

> > --- Tanvir <ultimate@s...> wrote:

> >

> > > To the best of my knowledge, it is "Bandhanan". The

> > > page

> > > http://www..org/mantra/mritunjay.htm

> > > gives very detailed info on this mantra.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > What can not happen, can never happen.

> > > Which is mine, is forever mine.

> > >

> > > http://www.jyotish-remedies.com - Vedic Astrology

> > > (Jyotish)

> > > Predictive astrology with incredibly powerful

> > > problem solving remedies

> > >

> > >

> > > -

> > > Bharat.s

> > >

> > > Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:24 PM

> > > Discrepancy regarding MAHA

> > > MRITYUNJAYA Mantra

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi guys!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I am Bharat from Bangalore.I recently bought the

> > > "Maha Mrityunjaya Mantra" released by "Times Music".

> > > According to the cassette the mantra goes like

> > > this---

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > (Om) Tryambakam yajamahe shugandhim pushti

> > > vardhanam

> > > Urvaarukamiva bandhanat-mrityur-mukshiya mamritat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > But in the jyotish-remedies website the mantra

> > > goes like this---

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > (Om) Tryambakam yajamahe shugandhim pushti

> > > vardhanam

> > > Urvaarukamiva bandhanan-mrityur-mukshiya mamritat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > As you can see there is a discrepancy in the word

> > > bandhanat and bandhanan.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I just wanted to know which one of them is

> > > correct. If anyone can clarify my doubt ,please

> > > reply to the ID or to

> > > bharat_bgl

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Thanks a lot!

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Bye,

> > >

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > >

> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been

> > > removed]

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> > =====

> > http://www.neerajgupta.com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> >

> >

> > Sponsor

> > Will you help a needy child?

> > ·It only costs .60¢ a day · It's easier than you think.·Click

here

> to meet a waiting child you can sponsor now.

> >

> >

> > Links

> >

> >

> > /

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Terms of

> Service.

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear friends,

> >

> > In some citations I have come across Bandanam instead of bandanan

> >

> > Love

> >

> > Pankaj Sharma

> >

> > India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.

> >

> >