2-Rohini & All, 4planets in a Sign!....> Mark Kincaid....10/18

[Guest guest]

Arvindji,

 

BPHS while describing sudarshana chakra indicates the order in which

planets represent a house, strongest being occupation.

 

If there are many planets in a given sign, the sign should be

strongly represented or be prominent in the person's life/experience.

Does that make sense?

 

In different 'classics' and jyotish books, you will find descriptions

for different signs, different planet in signs, etc.

 

Horoscopes which have many planets in a sign, particularly if the

planets are strong in shadbala offer an opportunity to test if those

descriptions given in jyotish texts apply or not, are they accurate

or not. One can then derive a more meaningful view of those

descriptions and other facts/rules given in a said book.

 

Does that make sense?

 

Something every jyotishi must carry out before vowing their

allegience to classics!

 

Does that still make sense? :-)

 

RR

 

 

, ArvindRaj

<rajendracholan4u> wrote:

> Dear Rohiniranjan Ji and Mr. Mark

>

> >>a stronger representation and attunement in the nativity's >>life

>

> Can you provide the details of what does it signify if planets are

amassed in each house. Say if planets are more in leo, what does it

signify...similarlly for other houses too...

>

> Regards

> Arvind

>

>

> rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

>

> In my experience, and this could be very different from yours (for

> statistical reasons given very early on by me in my jyotish

> writings), kanya lagna/rashi tends to be more of the multi-tasking

> kind you attribute to mithuna. Mithuna tend to be very

> focussed/concentrated kinds generally and can probably benefit from

a

> bunch of benefics being there. By the same token, a bunch of

malefics

> could pose a challenge to the mithuna trying to focus!

>

> Please note that this is not definitive, as we know one factor does

> not bring home the cows, as they say.

>

> Your point about more planets in a sign, giving a stronger

> representation and attunement in the nativity's life to that sign

is

> reasonable.

>

> RR

>

>

> RR

>

> , Mark Kincaid

> <m.kincaid@m...> wrote:

> > Dear Rohini: & All:

> >

> >

> > One other point I'd like to make regarding most people's

situations

> of 3, 4

> > or even 5 planets in one house...

> >

> > is....practical experience verifies, that almost all the time,

these

> > 'configurations' represent where a person has engaged in

> activities, in the

> > past,...that literally lead to that over concentration of

> those 'qualities'

> > and as a result they're living out that quality 'now', and as a

> result

> > learning the importance of balance...

> >

> > I know good examples of those with lots of Planets in Aries,

> Taurus, Gemini,

> > Cancer, Leo,...Virgo...etc....

> >

> > and all these people have way too much...

> > Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer,...Leo...etc...

> >

> > Take Gemini for example, the people I know who have that 3 or 4

> planets,

> > have such a strong, powerful 'gemini' nature....but all that

> gemini, gets

> > them in trouble now today.

> >

> > In other words, though the good, 'Gemini' habit of being able to

> juggle

> > several things at once, is okay.... but many planets in Gemini,

> means one

> > tends to attempt to juggle way too many things...and as a result

> gets way

> > out of balance,....and over extended...and not enough time is

left

> to go

> > into the necessary depth, ...of any of those areas...

> >

> > Another person comes to mind, who having many planets in Cancer,

> she's a

> > very lovely and wonderful lady...very giving, and unselfish....

> > like a Mother...

> > but....her 'fault' is that she overdoes it, gives too much...

> > and doesn't give with balance, or not how to give 'enough' to

> herself...

> >

> > The details of each person's situation, is very revealing, then,

by

> looking

> > at the details of the rising sign, and what houses, the planets

> rule that

> > are in that 'crowded' house....

> >

> >

> > Sincerely,

> >

> >

> >

> > Mark Kincaid

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

> >

> > Wed, 06 Oct 2004 22:55:00 -0000

> >

> > Re: Gurmeet ji...<Tanvir>

> >

> >

> >

> > My little experience indicates that people with more than 4

planets

> > in a house tend to be capable of intense concentration, unless the

> > planets are afflicted (general provisions apply) and particularly

if

> > a strong saturn is one of the players.

> >

> > Your email raised an interesting issue which I will just mention

and

> > bow out of this erudite discussion. When possible, it is

interesting

> > to take a look at the relative's horoscope also. Eventually cases

> > will emerge where a horoscope has certain + or - influences

> indicated

> > for a relative in a chart. The similar + or - influence may or may

> > not be depicted in the relative's chart during that given period.

> > Would be educational to study these two cohorts (both charts show

> > similar effects, or do not) and to study their experiences.

> >

> > A scenario is forming over time in my mind that some people

respond

> > to their charts better than others. I am sure there will be

several

> > suggestions for combinations that would be forwarded to explain

> these

> > two cohorts (responders vs non-responders to the starry theme!)

but

> > nothing that will clinch the diagnosis cold, as yet. The search

> > continues!

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , gurmeet singh

> > <hbk1hbk2000> wrote:

> > > Every chart has some problems, no one has perfect chart. So one

> > should feel happy with whatever he gets in his life. The seven

> > planets in 11th house are helping me fulfill my desires,

ambitions

> in

> > life. I was told by many astrologers in india long time back I

will

> > not be successful in my birth country. I must leave my birth

place

> to

> > be successful. They were right, nothing worked for me in india.

But

> > after I moved to US, I got success, money, fulfillment of desires.

> > Last 3 years were not so good because I was in the last 3 years of

> > Rahu mahadasha. Rahu mahadasa gives more problems in the first

> three

> > years and the last three years. Jan, Feb 2005 should be

interesting

> > months for me as Jupiter from Virgo will be trining all my seven

> > planets in 11th house and I will be Jupiter mahadasha.

> > >

> > > Tanvir <ultimate@s...> wrote:I would not like more than three

> > planets in a house. For several reasons. First it loses the

balance

> > of the chart. If benefics are in the same sign then it makes the

> > houses good but then other houses lose the blessings. Benefics all

> > over the chart [one sign per benefic] makes it balanced and then

> they

> > might end up aspecting / joining all the 12 houses in the chart,

> that

> > is good. Well I would only like to join benefics only once, that

is

> a

> > good Kendra lord and a good Kona lord - to form a Raja Yoga, LOL!

[i

> > have it already.]

> > >

> > > Then malefics in a same house make it very worse. The house

> suffers

> > too much. And not the other houses spare, never think so. Because,

> > for sign aspect, the malefics in the same house end up having

> aspects

> > on 3 other same signs/houses, again heavily afflicting those

houses.

> > >

> > > I have 4 planets in my 4th house. Su [12L], Merc [1L, 10L], Ve

> [2L,

> > 9L] and Ke. My family is troubled time to time. Maternal

happiness

> is

> > troubled in Su and Ke period seriously. Even Asc lord Merc

suffers a

> > lot. But thanks, 9L Ve is there, he does absolutely superb to

make

> up

> > everything in his periods. Then the 4th house is owned by another

> > benefic, Ju. I believe for a Virgo Asc., if Ju is well placed,

then

> > he is a very good benefic. I do not consider going malefic for

> owning

> > houses 4 or 7. I do not blame Kendra Adhipati Dosha either. It is

a

> > different topic Parasara talked about. I mean, I feel he had

> > something else in mind.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Tanvir.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > What can not happen, can never happen.

> > > Which is mine, is forever mine.

> > >

> > > Tanvir Chowdhury

> > > Cellular: +88 0189407202

> > > Mail: lord_narayana@l...

> > > Website: http://www.jyotish-remedies.com

> > > Forum:

> > >

> > > -

> > > Bharat Vyas

> > >

> > > Wednesday, October 06, 2004 11:10 PM

> > > Re: Gurmeet ji...

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I feel if someone has that many planets in a particular house

> the

> > best

> > > position would be 3rd house or 11th house cause i feel it

would

> > also

> > > influence the house its having aspect on....and 3 and 11 being

> > malefic

> > > house the malefics in malefic house wont harm you much where

as

> > when

> > > they give u good results the results are excellent. and when

> they

> > are

> > > aspecting 5 or 9th house from either 3 or 11 house their

aspect

> > would

> > > spoil u much cause eventually the aspecting planet might end

up

> > owing

> > > that house. so i feel if you have any number of planets on 3

or

> 11

> > > would end up giving good results in general. of course we

have

> to

> > > consider position of rahu and ketu.

> > >

> > > I am not an expert but this what i feel. Tanvir ji and other

> > members

> > > please comment.

> > >

> > > Bharat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> > >

> > >

> > > Sponsor

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Links

> > >

> > >

> > > /

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Terms of

> > Service.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Take Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> >

> >

> > Sponsor

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Links

> >

> > /

> >

> >

> >

> > <?

> subject=Un>

> >

> > Terms of

Service

> > <> .

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

> ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

>

>

> Sponsor

>

>

>

> Links

>

>

> /

>

>

>

>

> Terms of

Service.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>