Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Rohini ji... Vimshopak

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Rohini ji,

 

> And this does not apply to just vimshopak but even more basic

> issues

> with jyotish, bhava, chalita, combustion, ayanamsha, kalsarp

> yoga,

> mangal dosh, jaimini astrology, remedies ... you name it, it

> is up for debate somewhere. Sometimes it seems that jyotish

> was born out of Ravana! Ten heads, ten opinions ;-)

 

Completely agree, sir! One can NEVER be sure of anything, and

what applies in one place may not apply in another.

 

I'm currently reading Satyachariar's Jataka Satyachariyam,

translated by Shri CG Ranjan. This book looks at a slightly

different way of looking at Nakshatra Lord, Rasi Lord, Navamsa,

Lord, etc. Am still learning!

 

I earlier tried the pure "theory" approach, and this did not

help. I know that there are no shortcuts, and even to become an

apprentice in Jyotish takes years. But I'm patient. I propose to

slowly read, and then keep applying what I have read, to the

best of my ability, in the charts I'm analyzing. This

theory-practical approach, I feel, will help me in the long run.

 

IMHO, the Net gives us the following:

 

* Groups like this one, where one can meet learned members, who

help us in our quest.

* Downloadable e-books which, while not highly reliable, give us

a "feel" of a particular topic.

 

Of course, one needs to go back to the real, off-line world to

do anything serious! But, read offline (I mean, real paperback

books by experienced authors) and apply offline - that is

"seamless integration" for you, as the techies would put it!

 

Thanks for your advice. I will look into Vimshopak in the near

future. BTW, I had posted a small messange on Bija Sputa some

time back. Have you seen it? Please give me your thoughts, this

is the first time I have done something in this area!

 

BTW, nice to know that you know French. I studied it a loooooong

time ago. Today, the only line I can remember is "Je ne parle pa

en french" (I can't speak in French! :-)

 

Thanks for the inputs, and please keep them flowing!

 

 

=====

Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm

Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs

Editor, The Partial Art of Detection

=====

 

 

 

_______________________________

 

Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

http://vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Balaji,

 

Please do not misunderstand me! I consider cyber-realm and internet

(and its precursors) a big blessing in my life. Without that, I would

never have experienced real jyotish. Only when the reality of real,

ordinary nativities electrocutes one's parrot-like innocence, does

the logical mind begins to question something as mysterious and

shrouded in mystery cave of wisdom, known as astrology!

 

It made me become aware of my own and other people's pitfalls, traps

and hurdles which continue to keep one humble in the big scheme of

things.

 

However, it is a trecherous teacher. You snooze you lose!

 

Having bitten a few times, I consider it my duty to warn my brethren

(and sistren) about the worst-case scenario.

 

The beauty of jyotish is, once you decide to flow with it and not

treat it as physics or engineering or other exact sciences -- since

no technique or factor by itself is important, and strong effects

influences are always shown by nature in charts either strongly or in

a redundant manner, even if one does not apply or use all techniques,

they do not necessarily miss out or make mistakes. Not more than what

kaliyugi jyotishis are destined to make. As do scientists and similar

others, for that matter!

 

The problem I have with mainstream expression if not inner thinking

about jyotish is this: Everyone starts with the assumption that it is

perfect, it is 100% accurate etc., rather than exploring it without

preconceived expectations and notions and working towards perfection,

just as a child does, crawl-sit-walk-run-fine-tune-practice-practice-

practice-olympic gold medalist!

 

RR

 

, Balaji Narasimhan

<sherlockbalaji> wrote:

> Rohini ji,

>

> > And this does not apply to just vimshopak but even more basic

> > issues

> > with jyotish, bhava, chalita, combustion, ayanamsha, kalsarp

> > yoga,

> > mangal dosh, jaimini astrology, remedies ... you name it, it

> > is up for debate somewhere. Sometimes it seems that jyotish

> > was born out of Ravana! Ten heads, ten opinions ;-)

>

> Completely agree, sir! One can NEVER be sure of anything, and

> what applies in one place may not apply in another.

>

> I'm currently reading Satyachariar's Jataka Satyachariyam,

> translated by Shri CG Ranjan. This book looks at a slightly

> different way of looking at Nakshatra Lord, Rasi Lord, Navamsa,

> Lord, etc. Am still learning!

>

> I earlier tried the pure "theory" approach, and this did not

> help. I know that there are no shortcuts, and even to become an

> apprentice in Jyotish takes years. But I'm patient. I propose to

> slowly read, and then keep applying what I have read, to the

> best of my ability, in the charts I'm analyzing. This

> theory-practical approach, I feel, will help me in the long run.

>

> IMHO, the Net gives us the following:

>

> * Groups like this one, where one can meet learned members, who

> help us in our quest.

> * Downloadable e-books which, while not highly reliable, give us

> a "feel" of a particular topic.

>

> Of course, one needs to go back to the real, off-line world to

> do anything serious! But, read offline (I mean, real paperback

> books by experienced authors) and apply offline - that is

> "seamless integration" for you, as the techies would put it!

>

> Thanks for your advice. I will look into Vimshopak in the near

> future. BTW, I had posted a small messange on Bija Sputa some

> time back. Have you seen it? Please give me your thoughts, this

> is the first time I have done something in this area!

>

> BTW, nice to know that you know French. I studied it a loooooong

> time ago. Today, the only line I can remember is "Je ne parle pa

> en french" (I can't speak in French! :-)

>

> Thanks for the inputs, and please keep them flowing!

>

>

> =====

> Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm

> Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs

> Editor, The Partial Art of Detection

> =====

>

>

>

> _______________________________

>

> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

> http://vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...