[Rohini ji...Vimshopak segment-rsponse]

[Guest guest]

Please read Sharma ji's (GC Sharma) commentary on BPHS. Vimshopak is

not a simple calculation as some make it out to be (including

software). Also read about the ishta-kashta derivation.

 

RR

 

, Balaji Narasimhan

<sherlockbalaji> wrote:

> [Rohini ji]

>

> > I like to think of debility not so much a 'weakness' but a

> > change in

> > quality making the planet less shubha. Similar to pakshabala

> of

> > moon

> > which is also cyclical/phasic like exaltation-debilitation.

>

> Thanks. BTW, I looked up Vimshopak as per your advice. One

> question: Parasara says that if it is below 5 or between 10 and

> 15, it is bad, but a figure of 5 - 10 or 15 - 20 is good. To

> which Varga do you usually apply this? Shad or Sodasa, etc? BTW,

> if a Graha gets 17 in Shad, but 12 in Shoda, what is its status?

>

> Generally, how reliable have you found Vimshopak to be, overall?

> And how much weightange should it be given in the general scheme

> of things while analyzing a chart?

>

>