Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Religions

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Tanvir,

I am no expert atall on religion.

Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of cliche'.

 

What I meant to say that if you believe in astrology or not, or you

believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast variety of views

are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where you can have

freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

 

What you say is code of conduct for day to day living.

 

Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many sects or groups

within Hinduism.

 

The code of conduct which Islam provides is of very high order.

Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a DIVINE concept.

 

These code of conducts are good for disciplined and healthy living.

 

But the problem with these code of of conducts are that they need

revisions with passage of time.

 

But the owners of these code of conduct would not like changes which

threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house syndrome]

 

So eventhough they use mordern day things[electronic etc] for

consumption, but certain things are made so sacrosanct that one

would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not allowed/ this is

not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have to depend on

their interpretation.

 

When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be true or not, it is

not threatening Hinduism in any way.

I hope I coveyed my point of view.

 

Inder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope I do not hurt anyone by the following post, or rattle any

cages unnecessarily ...

 

To me the fact that there are so many religions with some common

messages but more or less very different details and rituals, and

norms indicates that they are different ways of looking at the

glittering (hopefully one and one only) Celestial, Cosmic, Diamond.

The fact the views are different is because the diamond is

multidimensional but human communication, and indeed perception is

limited in dimensions. Human perception has more dimensions than

human expression does. Therefore, some individuals state that 'it'

(the truth) must be experienced and not possible to fully describe.

Each nugget of truth (religion) has been coloured somewhat by the

desh, kal, paristhiti it arose in (even when it was divinely

revealed). The 'message' had eternal elements but was also topical

and addressed the time-period it was revealed in. Each subsequent

branch of religion had its reasons, its social necessity and the

message changed a bit. People confused the difference, somewhat

simplistically, to mean that their truth was the only one and all

earlier versions were false. Lots of babies got thrown out with some

bathwater, literally!

 

Today, religion has began to have an individualistic reference or

meaning. The society is less rigid in many ways (not all segments of

society, though, alas!) and this has its good and bad points,

obviously.

 

Rituals have been diminishing in their importance over time and few

ancient religions actually allow different viewpoints, different

perspectives and recommendations for following a more-encompassing

and somewhat flexible form of practicing religion. Particularly, the

spiritual practices that are recommended and endorsed (?) by the

religion.

 

RR

 

 

 

, "Inder"

<indervohra2001> wrote:

> Dear Tanvir,

> I am no expert atall on religion.

> Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of cliche'.

>

> What I meant to say that if you believe in astrology or not, or you

> believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast variety of views

> are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where you can have

> freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

>

> What you say is code of conduct for day to day living.

>

> Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many sects or groups

> within Hinduism.

>

> The code of conduct which Islam provides is of very high order.

> Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a DIVINE concept.

>

> These code of conducts are good for disciplined and healthy living.

>

> But the problem with these code of of conducts are that they need

> revisions with passage of time.

>

> But the owners of these code of conduct would not like changes

which

> threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house syndrome]

>

> So eventhough they use mordern day things[electronic etc] for

> consumption, but certain things are made so sacrosanct that one

> would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not allowed/ this is

> not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have to depend on

> their interpretation.

>

> When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be true or not, it

is

> not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> I hope I coveyed my point of view.

>

> Inder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a slice of an earlier realization pasted, hopefully, for your

pleasure, Inder:

 

ENIGMA

--------------------------

BY Rohiniranjan

==========================

Why must divinity, always --

be confined within human bounds

of birth and death,

pain and suffering,

everytime It must come to teach us, the power of LOVE?

Jesus, Krishna, Rama and Buddha ...

Why we humans are so privileged,

that His essence may only reach us

within confines of mortal flesh

to spread His Light, we seek so hard??

And why do we need to be reminded,

so often and with such force?

That we are all ... every single one of us,

children of that very same GOD?

Why must those who CAN love so well,

pass more tests than those who won't?

Why must the lotus grow in a bed of filth?

Why must a rose, the symbol of love ...

wear always its mantle of thorns??

============================================

 

RR

 

 

 

, "Inder"

<indervohra2001> wrote:

> Dear Tanvir,

> I am no expert atall on religion.

> Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of cliche'.

>

> What I meant to say that if you believe in astrology or not, or you

> believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast variety of views

> are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where you can have

> freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

>

> What you say is code of conduct for day to day living.

>

> Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many sects or groups

> within Hinduism.

>

> The code of conduct which Islam provides is of very high order.

> Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a DIVINE concept.

>

> These code of conducts are good for disciplined and healthy living.

>

> But the problem with these code of of conducts are that they need

> revisions with passage of time.

>

> But the owners of these code of conduct would not like changes

which

> threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house syndrome]

>

> So eventhough they use mordern day things[electronic etc] for

> consumption, but certain things are made so sacrosanct that one

> would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not allowed/ this is

> not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have to depend on

> their interpretation.

>

> When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be true or not, it

is

> not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> I hope I coveyed my point of view.

>

> Inder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one, strongly believe the values taught by

religion is more important than the rituals.

 

Mikey

 

 

--- rohiniranjan <rrgb wrote:

 

> I hope I do not hurt anyone by the following post,

> or rattle any

> cages unnecessarily ...

>

> To me the fact that there are so many religions with

> some common

> messages but more or less very different details and

> rituals, and

> norms indicates that they are different ways of

> looking at the

> glittering (hopefully one and one only) Celestial,

> Cosmic, Diamond.

> The fact the views are different is because the

> diamond is

> multidimensional but human communication, and indeed

> perception is

> limited in dimensions. Human perception has more

> dimensions than

> human expression does. Therefore, some individuals

> state that 'it'

> (the truth) must be experienced and not possible to

> fully describe.

> Each nugget of truth (religion) has been coloured

> somewhat by the

> desh, kal, paristhiti it arose in (even when it was

> divinely

> revealed). The 'message' had eternal elements but

> was also topical

> and addressed the time-period it was revealed in.

> Each subsequent

> branch of religion had its reasons, its social

> necessity and the

> message changed a bit. People confused the

> difference, somewhat

> simplistically, to mean that their truth was the

> only one and all

> earlier versions were false. Lots of babies got

> thrown out with some

> bathwater, literally!

>

> Today, religion has began to have an individualistic

> reference or

> meaning. The society is less rigid in many ways (not

> all segments of

> society, though, alas!) and this has its good and

> bad points,

> obviously.

>

> Rituals have been diminishing in their importance

> over time and few

> ancient religions actually allow different

> viewpoints, different

> perspectives and recommendations for following a

> more-encompassing

> and somewhat flexible form of practicing religion.

> Particularly, the

> spiritual practices that are recommended and

> endorsed (?) by the

> religion.

>

> RR

>

>

>

> , "Inder"

> <indervohra2001> wrote:

> > Dear Tanvir,

> > I am no expert atall on religion.

> > Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of

> cliche'.

> >

> > What I meant to say that if you believe in

> astrology or not, or you

> > believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast

> variety of views

> > are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where

> you can have

> > freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

> >

> > What you say is code of conduct for day to day

> living.

> >

> > Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many

> sects or groups

> > within Hinduism.

> >

> > The code of conduct which Islam provides is of

> very high order.

> > Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a

> DIVINE concept.

> >

> > These code of conducts are good for disciplined

> and healthy living.

> >

> > But the problem with these code of of conducts are

> that they need

> > revisions with passage of time.

> >

> > But the owners of these code of conduct would not

> like changes

> which

> > threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house

> syndrome]

> >

> > So eventhough they use mordern day

> things[electronic etc] for

> > consumption, but certain things are made so

> sacrosanct that one

> > would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not

> allowed/ this is

> > not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have

> to depend on

> > their interpretation.

> >

> > When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be

> true or not, it

> is

> > not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> > I hope I coveyed my point of view.

> >

> > Inder

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but before one gets Ph.D. one has to go through long years of

grade school, college, university, etc :-)

 

Happy graduation!

 

RR

 

, michael tee eng hui

<mteh1> wrote:

> I for one, strongly believe the values taught by

> religion is more important than the rituals.

>

> Mikey

>

>

> --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

>

> > I hope I do not hurt anyone by the following post,

> > or rattle any

> > cages unnecessarily ...

> >

> > To me the fact that there are so many religions with

> > some common

> > messages but more or less very different details and

> > rituals, and

> > norms indicates that they are different ways of

> > looking at the

> > glittering (hopefully one and one only) Celestial,

> > Cosmic, Diamond.

> > The fact the views are different is because the

> > diamond is

> > multidimensional but human communication, and indeed

> > perception is

> > limited in dimensions. Human perception has more

> > dimensions than

> > human expression does. Therefore, some individuals

> > state that 'it'

> > (the truth) must be experienced and not possible to

> > fully describe.

> > Each nugget of truth (religion) has been coloured

> > somewhat by the

> > desh, kal, paristhiti it arose in (even when it was

> > divinely

> > revealed). The 'message' had eternal elements but

> > was also topical

> > and addressed the time-period it was revealed in.

> > Each subsequent

> > branch of religion had its reasons, its social

> > necessity and the

> > message changed a bit. People confused the

> > difference, somewhat

> > simplistically, to mean that their truth was the

> > only one and all

> > earlier versions were false. Lots of babies got

> > thrown out with some

> > bathwater, literally!

> >

> > Today, religion has began to have an individualistic

> > reference or

> > meaning. The society is less rigid in many ways (not

> > all segments of

> > society, though, alas!) and this has its good and

> > bad points,

> > obviously.

> >

> > Rituals have been diminishing in their importance

> > over time and few

> > ancient religions actually allow different

> > viewpoints, different

> > perspectives and recommendations for following a

> > more-encompassing

> > and somewhat flexible form of practicing religion.

> > Particularly, the

> > spiritual practices that are recommended and

> > endorsed (?) by the

> > religion.

> >

> > RR

> >

> >

> >

> > , "Inder"

> > <indervohra2001> wrote:

> > > Dear Tanvir,

> > > I am no expert atall on religion.

> > > Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of

> > cliche'.

> > >

> > > What I meant to say that if you believe in

> > astrology or not, or you

> > > believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast

> > variety of views

> > > are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where

> > you can have

> > > freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

> > >

> > > What you say is code of conduct for day to day

> > living.

> > >

> > > Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many

> > sects or groups

> > > within Hinduism.

> > >

> > > The code of conduct which Islam provides is of

> > very high order.

> > > Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a

> > DIVINE concept.

> > >

> > > These code of conducts are good for disciplined

> > and healthy living.

> > >

> > > But the problem with these code of of conducts are

> > that they need

> > > revisions with passage of time.

> > >

> > > But the owners of these code of conduct would not

> > like changes

> > which

> > > threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house

> > syndrome]

> > >

> > > So eventhough they use mordern day

> > things[electronic etc] for

> > > consumption, but certain things are made so

> > sacrosanct that one

> > > would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not

> > allowed/ this is

> > > not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have

> > to depend on

> > > their interpretation.

> > >

> > > When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be

> > true or not, it

> > is

> > > not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> > > I hope I coveyed my point of view.

> > >

> > > Inder

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How true! Rituals were designed with most of us, who strongly identify

with the gross body, in mind. They allow us to do something concrete

with the body and mind while still hastening our spiritual progress;

rituals are tools which, ultimately, are designed to allow us to

transcend their physical nature and render us fit for more esoteric

practices of an advanced nature.

 

- Vikram.

 

 

, "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

wrote:

> Yes, but before one gets Ph.D. one has to go through long years of

> grade school, college, university, etc :-)

>

> Happy graduation!

>

> RR

>

> , michael tee eng hui

> <mteh1> wrote:

> > I for one, strongly believe the values taught by

> > religion is more important than the rituals.

> >

> > Mikey

> >

> >

> > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> >

> > > I hope I do not hurt anyone by the following post,

> > > or rattle any

> > > cages unnecessarily ...

> > >

> > > To me the fact that there are so many religions with

> > > some common

> > > messages but more or less very different details and

> > > rituals, and

> > > norms indicates that they are different ways of

> > > looking at the

> > > glittering (hopefully one and one only) Celestial,

> > > Cosmic, Diamond.

> > > The fact the views are different is because the

> > > diamond is

> > > multidimensional but human communication, and indeed

> > > perception is

> > > limited in dimensions. Human perception has more

> > > dimensions than

> > > human expression does. Therefore, some individuals

> > > state that 'it'

> > > (the truth) must be experienced and not possible to

> > > fully describe.

> > > Each nugget of truth (religion) has been coloured

> > > somewhat by the

> > > desh, kal, paristhiti it arose in (even when it was

> > > divinely

> > > revealed). The 'message' had eternal elements but

> > > was also topical

> > > and addressed the time-period it was revealed in.

> > > Each subsequent

> > > branch of religion had its reasons, its social

> > > necessity and the

> > > message changed a bit. People confused the

> > > difference, somewhat

> > > simplistically, to mean that their truth was the

> > > only one and all

> > > earlier versions were false. Lots of babies got

> > > thrown out with some

> > > bathwater, literally!

> > >

> > > Today, religion has began to have an individualistic

> > > reference or

> > > meaning. The society is less rigid in many ways (not

> > > all segments of

> > > society, though, alas!) and this has its good and

> > > bad points,

> > > obviously.

> > >

> > > Rituals have been diminishing in their importance

> > > over time and few

> > > ancient religions actually allow different

> > > viewpoints, different

> > > perspectives and recommendations for following a

> > > more-encompassing

> > > and somewhat flexible form of practicing religion.

> > > Particularly, the

> > > spiritual practices that are recommended and

> > > endorsed (?) by the

> > > religion.

> > >

> > > RR

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , "Inder"

> > > <indervohra2001> wrote:

> > > > Dear Tanvir,

> > > > I am no expert atall on religion.

> > > > Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of

> > > cliche'.

> > > >

> > > > What I meant to say that if you believe in

> > > astrology or not, or you

> > > > believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast

> > > variety of views

> > > > are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where

> > > you can have

> > > > freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

> > > >

> > > > What you say is code of conduct for day to day

> > > living.

> > > >

> > > > Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many

> > > sects or groups

> > > > within Hinduism.

> > > >

> > > > The code of conduct which Islam provides is of

> > > very high order.

> > > > Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a

> > > DIVINE concept.

> > > >

> > > > These code of conducts are good for disciplined

> > > and healthy living.

> > > >

> > > > But the problem with these code of of conducts are

> > > that they need

> > > > revisions with passage of time.

> > > >

> > > > But the owners of these code of conduct would not

> > > like changes

> > > which

> > > > threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house

> > > syndrome]

> > > >

> > > > So eventhough they use mordern day

> > > things[electronic etc] for

> > > > consumption, but certain things are made so

> > > sacrosanct that one

> > > > would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not

> > > allowed/ this is

> > > > not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have

> > > to depend on

> > > > their interpretation.

> > > >

> > > > When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be

> > > true or not, it

> > > is

> > > > not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> > > > I hope I coveyed my point of view.

> > > >

> > > > Inder

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad you see it that way! I often hear parents and grandparents

getting exasperated with younger generations because of their

different taste in music and make comments like "Is this music,

babbare!" and the younger generation making a face and tuning out

when their parents play their classical music or whatever! Both

generations forget that it is really about the 'enjoyment' that

probably both enjoy equally, though from different sources of

expression!

 

Many 'modern' music lovers have turned to more classical tastes in

music and vice versa is true as well.

 

What would be painful is if a music lover suddenly begins to get

enjoyment out of the harsh rhythm of bullets flying ...!

 

 

RR

 

 

 

, "Vikram" <vadravid@h...>

wrote:

> How true! Rituals were designed with most of us, who strongly

identify

> with the gross body, in mind. They allow us to do something

concrete

> with the body and mind while still hastening our spiritual progress;

> rituals are tools which, ultimately, are designed to allow us to

> transcend their physical nature and render us fit for more esoteric

> practices of an advanced nature.

>

> - Vikram.

>

>

> , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

> wrote:

> > Yes, but before one gets Ph.D. one has to go through long years

of

> > grade school, college, university, etc :-)

> >

> > Happy graduation!

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , michael tee eng hui

> > <mteh1> wrote:

> > > I for one, strongly believe the values taught by

> > > religion is more important than the rituals.

> > >

> > > Mikey

> > >

> > >

> > > --- rohiniranjan <rrgb@s...> wrote:

> > >

> > > > I hope I do not hurt anyone by the following post,

> > > > or rattle any

> > > > cages unnecessarily ...

> > > >

> > > > To me the fact that there are so many religions with

> > > > some common

> > > > messages but more or less very different details and

> > > > rituals, and

> > > > norms indicates that they are different ways of

> > > > looking at the

> > > > glittering (hopefully one and one only) Celestial,

> > > > Cosmic, Diamond.

> > > > The fact the views are different is because the

> > > > diamond is

> > > > multidimensional but human communication, and indeed

> > > > perception is

> > > > limited in dimensions. Human perception has more

> > > > dimensions than

> > > > human expression does. Therefore, some individuals

> > > > state that 'it'

> > > > (the truth) must be experienced and not possible to

> > > > fully describe.

> > > > Each nugget of truth (religion) has been coloured

> > > > somewhat by the

> > > > desh, kal, paristhiti it arose in (even when it was

> > > > divinely

> > > > revealed). The 'message' had eternal elements but

> > > > was also topical

> > > > and addressed the time-period it was revealed in.

> > > > Each subsequent

> > > > branch of religion had its reasons, its social

> > > > necessity and the

> > > > message changed a bit. People confused the

> > > > difference, somewhat

> > > > simplistically, to mean that their truth was the

> > > > only one and all

> > > > earlier versions were false. Lots of babies got

> > > > thrown out with some

> > > > bathwater, literally!

> > > >

> > > > Today, religion has began to have an individualistic

> > > > reference or

> > > > meaning. The society is less rigid in many ways (not

> > > > all segments of

> > > > society, though, alas!) and this has its good and

> > > > bad points,

> > > > obviously.

> > > >

> > > > Rituals have been diminishing in their importance

> > > > over time and few

> > > > ancient religions actually allow different

> > > > viewpoints, different

> > > > perspectives and recommendations for following a

> > > > more-encompassing

> > > > and somewhat flexible form of practicing religion.

> > > > Particularly, the

> > > > spiritual practices that are recommended and

> > > > endorsed (?) by the

> > > > religion.

> > > >

> > > > RR

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > , "Inder"

> > > > <indervohra2001> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Tanvir,

> > > > > I am no expert atall on religion.

> > > > > Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of

> > > > cliche'.

> > > > >

> > > > > What I meant to say that if you believe in

> > > > astrology or not, or you

> > > > > believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast

> > > > variety of views

> > > > > are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where

> > > > you can have

> > > > > freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

> > > > >

> > > > > What you say is code of conduct for day to day

> > > > living.

> > > > >

> > > > > Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many

> > > > sects or groups

> > > > > within Hinduism.

> > > > >

> > > > > The code of conduct which Islam provides is of

> > > > very high order.

> > > > > Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a

> > > > DIVINE concept.

> > > > >

> > > > > These code of conducts are good for disciplined

> > > > and healthy living.

> > > > >

> > > > > But the problem with these code of of conducts are

> > > > that they need

> > > > > revisions with passage of time.

> > > > >

> > > > > But the owners of these code of conduct would not

> > > > like changes

> > > > which

> > > > > threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house

> > > > syndrome]

> > > > >

> > > > > So eventhough they use mordern day

> > > > things[electronic etc] for

> > > > > consumption, but certain things are made so

> > > > sacrosanct that one

> > > > > would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not

> > > > allowed/ this is

> > > > > not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have

> > > > to depend on

> > > > > their interpretation.

> > > > >

> > > > > When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be

> > > > true or not, it

> > > > is

> > > > > not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> > > > > I hope I coveyed my point of view.

> > > > >

> > > > > Inder

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice, Rohiniji.

Inder

 

- In , "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

wrote:

> a slice of an earlier realization pasted, hopefully, for your

> pleasure, Inder:

>

> ENIGMA

> --------------------------

> BY Rohiniranjan

> ==========================

> Why must divinity, always --

> be confined within human bounds

> of birth and death,

> pain and suffering,

> everytime It must come to teach us, the power of LOVE?

> Jesus, Krishna, Rama and Buddha ...

> Why we humans are so privileged,

> that His essence may only reach us

> within confines of mortal flesh

> to spread His Light, we seek so hard??

> And why do we need to be reminded,

> so often and with such force?

> That we are all ... every single one of us,

> children of that very same GOD?

> Why must those who CAN love so well,

> pass more tests than those who won't?

> Why must the lotus grow in a bed of filth?

> Why must a rose, the symbol of love ...

> wear always its mantle of thorns??

> ============================================

>

> RR

>

>

>

> , "Inder"

> <indervohra2001> wrote:

> > Dear Tanvir,

> > I am no expert atall on religion.

> > Hinduism is a way of life, yes that is a sort of cliche'.

> >

> > What I meant to say that if you believe in astrology or not, or

you

> > believe in Geeta or not , you can be Hindu. Vast variety of

views

> > are part of Hinduism. Sort of democratic way where you can have

> > freedom to expand.[ 5th house]

> >

> > What you say is code of conduct for day to day living.

> >

> > Yes , these code of conducts are invented in many sects or

groups

> > within Hinduism.

> >

> > The code of conduct which Islam provides is of very high order.

> > Universal brotherhood concept is in true sence a DIVINE concept.

> >

> > These code of conducts are good for disciplined and healthy

living.

> >

> > But the problem with these code of of conducts are that they

need

> > revisions with passage of time.

> >

> > But the owners of these code of conduct would not like changes

> which

> > threaten their power or money inflow.[4th house syndrome]

> >

> > So eventhough they use mordern day things[electronic etc] for

> > consumption, but certain things are made so sacrosanct that one

> > would feel suffocated for fresh air. [that is not allowed/ this

is

> > not as per rule etc]. No scope of growth. You have to depend on

> > their interpretation.

> >

> > When I was discussing about theory of Karma to be true or not,

it

> is

> > not threatening Hinduism in any way.

> > I hope I coveyed my point of view.

> >

> > Inder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...