Guest guest Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 Respected Gurus, I am an avid learner of vedic astrology and ahve some queries pertaining to it. Query 1---I am very confused about the fact that Mecury has been classified as a neutral for Gemini ascendant & a funtional benefic for Virgo ascendant by the sage.Now what is the reason behind this? Shouldnt it be benefic for both the ascendants since it rules the ascendant(which is a kona & kendra ) as well a kendra?please throw some light on this query? Queyr 2-- Does the aspect of 9th lord on 10th house and 10th lord on 9th house constitute the famous Dharma Karmadhipati yoga? Waiting eagerly for views..... Kind Regards, Hamendra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 Please try to find out from classics the relative strengths of the kendras. Not all kendras are equally strong. Then take into account the adage that a benefic that owns a kendra cannot fully deliver its beneficience (this has been (mis)interpreted by some as benefics ruling kendras are malefics! Anyways, ponder on these two factors and the reasoning behing your Q1 will begin to make sense. The answer to your Q2 lies in a study of sudarshan charts towards the end of BPHS. Mind you! The above are what will lead you to the so called reasoning, provided what is given in classics does bear the testimony of experienced truth. for that you would have to test the adages in real horoscopes and then you can make up your mind. Just because something is stated in an impressive looking, yellowing, dog- eared tome or tomes does not necessarily mean it would be unconditionally true! RR , "hamendra_c" <hamendra_c> wrote: > Respected Gurus, > I am an avid learner of vedic astrology and ahve some > queries pertaining to it. > > Query 1---I am very confused about the fact that Mecury has been > classified as a neutral for Gemini ascendant & a funtional benefic > for Virgo ascendant by the sage.Now what is the reason behind this? > Shouldnt it be benefic for both the ascendants since it rules the > ascendant(which is a kona & kendra ) as well a kendra?please throw > some light on this query? > > Queyr 2-- Does the aspect of 9th lord on 10th house and 10th lord on > 9th house constitute the famous Dharma Karmadhipati yoga? > > Waiting eagerly for views..... > > Kind Regards, > Hamendra. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2004 Report Share Posted September 8, 2004 hi to all gurus this is my practical experience that mercury is not benefic ( infact mild malefic ) for the virgo and gemini ascendants ...although parashara has mentioned it to be a benefic for virgo and neutral for gemini. deep --- hamendra_c <hamendra_c wrote: > Respected Gurus, > I am an avid learner of vedic > astrology and ahve some > queries pertaining to it. > > Query 1---I am very confused about the fact that > Mecury has been > classified as a neutral for Gemini ascendant & a > funtional benefic > for Virgo ascendant by the sage.Now what is the > reason behind this? > Shouldnt it be benefic for both the ascendants since > it rules the > ascendant(which is a kona & kendra ) as well a > kendra?please throw > some light on this query? > > Queyr 2-- Does the aspect of 9th lord on 10th house > and 10th lord on > 9th house constitute the famous Dharma Karmadhipati > yoga? > > Waiting eagerly for views..... > > Kind Regards, > Hamendra. > > _______________________________ Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Enter now. http://promotions./goldrush Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.