Mukund horoscope

[Guest guest]

Hello dear Mukund,

 

Hare Krishna. No doubt, you are yourself a great personality,a

spiritual person, as I mentioned else where in my post to you. From

the time of your birth till 1981 while acquiring knowledge, you have

learned a lot with lots of challenging during that period. Ofcourse,

you left your birth place to go to abroad for pursuing your career

and settle your life there.

 

Which part of the world, you are living, Mukund ?

 

You are a good Advisor, Administrator, in a financial field and

spiritual field as well. Your Moon period was a good start but not

all. You have had a manageable some what difficult period during

Sept.89 - Feb.91. Now you are in the period of malefic Mars/Sun

which is not as good as the Moon period and in Oct., 2004 the sub

period of Moon will begin which looks very promising.

 

By the way, the Guru is exalted but conjuncting Most Malefic Venus

which renders week. Nevertheless, the Guru controls the 2nd house of

family and 5th house of children in which Most benefic Saturn

occupies besides the close aspects on the Asdt. and 5h. assure you a

good family and future.

 

My suggestion is to you that you must propitiate Rahu, Ketu, Mars and

Venus and strengthen weak benefic planets i.e. Sun (old age), Moon (a

little afflicted by Rahu), and Jupiter (closely conjuncted by

malefic Venus)in order to get the enhanced better result. Saturn is

very well situated. No need to strengthen Saturn.

 

 

Well, this is little short basic eassy about your horoscope. Hope

you like it.

 

With my best wishes.............Amar Puri.

 

 

, "monmuk111" <monmuk111>

wrote:

> Hello Amar:

>

> You're correct, Moon is the most benefic planet in my chart. Even

> Jupiter the 5th lord is a benefic and totally unafflicted, but the

> reason I say that Moon the most benefic because I consider 9th lord

a

> higher benefic than the 5th lord. Moon is also in Shukla-paksha.

>

> Moon, however is afflicted by Rahu's 9th house aspect from the 6th

> house. If you want a clearer picture, here are my birts details:

>

> Amar, I've specifically chased people going through Badhakesh and

9th

> lord mahadasa and they seem to have prominent 9th lord results than

> badhak results.

>

> --I'm currently observing my cousin in who began badahk and 9th

lord

> mahadasa four years back. Just as the 9th lord/badhak dasa begin,

he

> sold his run-down/crack-cocain/whorehouse hotel NEAR downtown San

> Francisco for 14 million dollars to a property development company

> and now runs one Ramada and one Holiday-Inn. Before the 9th lord

> mahadasa begin, his life was miserable as someone pulled a gun on

him

> almost every week, now he is a multi-millioner.

>

> June 14, 1967; 5.29 pm; Bombay, India.

>

> Mukund

>

> , "amarpuri2004"

<satvac@h...>

> wrote:

> > Dear Mukund,

> >

> > Hare Krishna. You wrote ;

> >

> > "One such dictum is the concept of Badhak planets/Badhakesh--how

can

> > 9th lord be a trouble giving planet???? I've gone through the

> > mahadasa of Moon, the badakesh and the 9th lord. Jyotishas had

> > predicted the my life will be ruined in Moon mahadasa as it was

the

> > Badhakesh, but I had unimaginable and unplanned success during

> > Moon/9th lord/Badhakesh mahadasa."

> >

> > MY ANSWER TO THE ABOVE IS THAT WITHOUT KNOWING YOUR HOROSCOPE

> > DETAILS, IT APPEARS FROM YOUR MESSAGE ABOVE THAT THE MOON IS

> > CERTAINLY A BENEFIC PLANET AND IS FREE FROM ANY TYPE OF

AFFLICTION

> IN

> > YOUR CHART (WITHOUT APPLYING ANY CLASSICAL CONCEPT) WHICH

INDICATES

> > SUCH SUCCESS. PLEASE CONFIRM AND FEEL FREE TO POST YOUR BIRTH

> > DETAILS FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS TOPIC, IF YOU SO DESIRE.

> >

> > With my best wishes.............Amar Puri.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , "monmuk111"

> <monmuk111>

> > wrote:

> > > Hello Nandini:

> > >

> > > Conjunction is a conjunction and that'll make this horoscope

KSY

> > > FREE, I'm convinced your friend DOESN'T have KSY. Your friend

is

> > > likely to experience the Rajyogs more than anything else in

> his/her

> > > horoscope. I'm aware that a LOT of Jyotish out there point to

the

> > > degrees and say that a KSY is present if the conjuct planet to

> Rahu

> > > or Ketu falls within the degree. I prescribe to no such

bullshit.

> > >

> > > --But, this is my personal opinion. At the VA discussion group,

> if

> > I

> > > had made this statement, 20 Jyotishas would have asked me for a

> > quote

> > > from the classics. But, the way I learn Jyotish is to closely

> > follow

> > > lives of 15-20 individuals with some unique attributes as KSY

or

> 3

> > > exhalted plantes, etc. and see what happens in their lives.

> > >

> > > Some Jyotishs like the ones on VA group are obessesed with

> quoting

> > > the classics. Classics give us the dictum, it is for us to

> > > experiment, adjudicate and conclude if these dictum come true

or

> > are

> > > a big heap of bull-crap.

> > >

> > > One such dictum is the concept of Badhak planets/Badhakesh--how

> can

> > > 9th lord be a trouble giving planet???? I've gone through the

> > > mahadasa of Moon, the badakesh and the 9th lord. Jyotishas had

> > > predicted the my life will be ruined in Moon mahadasa as it was

> the

> > > Badhakesh, but I had unimaginable and unplanned success during

> > > Moon/9th lord/Badhakesh mahadasa.

> > >

> > > Mukund

> > >

> > >

> > > , "kakan_leo"

> > <kakan_leo>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Mukund ji,

> > > >

> > > > Thanks for the clarifications. I am getting Jupiter

> conjuncting

> > > Rahu

> > > > in 6th house as well using Jalpaiguri.

> > > > One other point.

> > > > In case of such conjunctions, would you advise to take into

> > > account

> > > > the exact degree of the conjuncting planet to determine

whether

> > it

> > > is

> > > > hemmed in between Rahu and ketu or not?

> > > > This person by the way has spent a lot of money for a yantra

> > given

> > > > by some 'expert' in such yogas and is completely convinced

that

> > he

> > > > has the yoga. More than the money, it is the attitude, that

> such

> > a

> > > > wrong diagnosis brings in a native, that is damaging.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Nandini.