ADMIN: Sanjay Rath's failure..Shameful act Mr. Tata

[Guest guest]

Dear Chi.Tanveer,

You have rightly remarked about the double purpose of the gentleman in question

to spread the word about Mr.Rath's failure in prediction.There is a different

purpose of the gentleman in question about his real intentions.

People sometimes say something but Mean something else.

If the gentleman in question is so much concerned, he should have written to

dissatisfied client of Chi.Sanjay Rath.

Such act is much worse than the original post made by Mr.Sudeep Puri.

Your sentiments are seconded.

 

Tatvam-asi

 

Tanvir Chowdhury <lord_narayana wrote:

Hello Mr. Tata,

 

I appreciate your concern about your opinion that the private paid

reading should not be discussed in public. It is good to see that one

astrologer hopes that another astrologer would get the fairness he

deserves. Today the world of astrology is a mess since astrologers

from different schools envy each other. So your fairness and just is

appreciated in this regard.

 

However, there are also facts in your post that I do not appreciate

at all. The complaint was made in another list, and it is enough when

you protest it right there. However, you have made replies to the

post to other lists, where even the original post did not appear,

such as Gjlist, and this list. So what is the point of replying to

these lists? Only people of the Vedic-Astrology list would know this,

seeing the post. But when you have replied to other lists, where even

the original posts did not appear, you actually helped the person to

announce it even better.

 

There is no reason in this post to reply here because even the

original post was not posted here. Rather this is to announce the

complaint even better.

 

Also you have pulled in the topic of police cases out of all sudden,

out of a stream. He did not mention it anywhere it is you who is

mentioning it.

 

So what you did, is rather a better announcement of it than

protesting it. This is noted, so please do not repeat such

performances in this list again. No need to reply posts those were

posted in another list.

 

Thanks,

Tanvir.

 

 

, "Pandit S.P.Tata"

wrote:

> Dear Mr. Sudeep Suri,

>

> As a professional astrologer I find the enclosed mail by you to

Sanjay

> Rath (regarding the failure of his prediction in your case) in very

> bad taste.

>

> First of all let me make it very clear that I have never met Sanjay

> Rath, I am not his student and I am not his follower -especially

in

> view of his running away from Delhi to avoid police arrest in his

> famous fraud case.

>

> However I do not appreciate your parading his prediction failure in

> public. Astrologers maintain client privacy and don't talk about

> questions asked or advise given. If Sanjay Rath discusses your

private

> sex life in public you'll not like it. Similarly we astrologers

also

> expect some fairness from the people to whom we give predictions.

>

> The Vedic astrology principles given by our ancient seers are r

100%

> true. It is we astrologers whose knowledge has its limitations. We

> don't have the spritual Divya Gyan of our ancients. As there are

> millions of combinations to study, its impossible to be 100% right

for

> any astrologer. I have been practicing Vedic astrology for more

than

> 20 years, studied more than a couple of dozen astrology sashtras, I

> run my own astrology website - www.astrojyoti.com - I am fortunate

to

> have a relative like the world famous astrologer K.N.Rao to guide

me

> whenever I seek advise, but in spite of all that am only about 75%

> correct. There are those 25% predictions, which do go wrong. The

day

> we are 100% right we'll be in heaven with Rishi Bhrigu and Rishi

> Parashara and not here.

>

> With thousands of the best scientists working and after spending

> billions of US$, NASA can't guarantee its satellites. The doctors

make

> wrong diagnosis even after cat scans and dog scans, the bridges

built

> by engineers crash and the accountants and financial advisers to

> nations flop frequently to cause economic crashes. But their

> professions and their sciences are not questioned. But the moment

an

> astrologer fails people are willing to indulge in sarcastic

> mudslinging in public.

> Just a decade ago our doctors and the medical bureaucrats were

openly

> ridiculing Ayurveda. But once the Yankees got on to it and started

> patenting our formulae, we have an alternate medicine dept. and

sing

> international songs about our cultural heritage. I suppose our

press

> and public will recognize Vedic astrology only when Harvard

University

> starts teaching it!!

>

> I am sure you have received some correct predictions also from some

> astrologers. Have you acknowledged them in public like this?

>

> I sincerely request all group members to refrain from this kind of

> mudslinging sarcasm.

> With regards

> Pandit S.P.Tata

>

> -

> sudeep suri

> vedic astrology

> Thursday, July 29, 2004 12:37 PM

> [vedic astrology] TO SANJAY RATHJI

>

> DEAR SANJAY RATH JI MAHARAJ

> Reference my astrological consultation with you on 29 JAN 2004 VIA

> telephone.After the consultation you sent me an audio casette of

> predictions(OUR TAPED CONVERSATION ).

>

> NOW 6 months down the line I find that all your predictions are

> incorrect.Your most important prediction was that in MAY 2004 in

KETU

> pratyantar I will get something fantastic and that in JULY 2004 I

will

> be in USA. Sir JULY is finished I am in INDIA and I never got

anything

> FANTASTIC as you mentioned in MAY 2004.

>

> I am wondering WHY YOU HAVE GONE WRONG because you took lot of

pains

> to explain the astrological reasoning behind it.So DOES THIS MEAN

> ASTROLOGY IS NO SCIENCE OR YOUR REASONING AND ANALYSIS IS INCORRECT

I

> WOULD BE INTERESTED TO KNOW.

> REGARDS

> SUDEEP

>

>

 

 

 

 

~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~