Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 Inderji, > What are we trying to say that it is not good to be a > astrologer by > merely reading books. And some make fun of internet astrology > also. > What is the most authentic method of studying astrology or for > that > any other subject?! > Inder IMHO, one needs BOTH theory and practice. In the initial phase, theory helps you understand the basics, but you only understand the implications by trying to read charts yourself. One makes a lot of mistakes initially--but, like cycling, you can only learn astrology by falling down repeatedly and getting up again, dusting the mud off your clothes, and then trying again. Feedback is very important--I have been trying to read charts for a while. I'm trying my best, but my knowledge is limited. Some readers do revert and tell me things, but, I feel, if people gave more feedback, it would help more. People like Rohini ji, Tanvir ji, yourself, etc, can help budding amateurs like me learn the intricacies more easily by providing constructive criticism. ===== Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs Editor, The Partial Art of Detection ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 Yes dear Bala ji , Agreed, what you say. I always try to give explanation about my reading the chart by KP. But mostly I notice that after giving my reading most of the time I donot get any questions or feed back. May be KP appears to be a bit different from traditional concepts so no body wants to explore and get confused. The chart has also to be prepared differently. Last year when I joined internet astrology in the astroexpert.com I thought that KP would be most popular method and I would learn something more on INternet but as I see that KP is not atall popular. But one has to learn from all over , and from every thing. Shortage of time also becomes a big problem if you want to explore some thing deep. Inder -- In , Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji> wrote: > Inderji, > > > What are we trying to say that it is not good to be a > > astrologer by > > merely reading books. And some make fun of internet astrology > > also. > > What is the most authentic method of studying astrology or for > > that > > any other subject?! > > Inder > > IMHO, one needs BOTH theory and practice. In the initial phase, > theory helps you understand the basics, but you only understand > the implications by trying to read charts yourself. One makes a > lot of mistakes initially--but, like cycling, you can only learn > astrology by falling down repeatedly and getting up again, > dusting the mud off your clothes, and then trying again. > > Feedback is very important--I have been trying to read charts > for a while. I'm trying my best, but my knowledge is limited. > Some readers do revert and tell me things, but, I feel, if > people gave more feedback, it would help more. People like > Rohini ji, Tanvir ji, yourself, etc, can help budding amateurs > like me learn the intricacies more easily by providing > constructive criticism. > > > > ===== > Balaji Narasimhan * http://www.sherlock-holmes.com/balaji.htm > Author, Sherlock Holmes: Solutions from the Sussex Downs > Editor, The Partial Art of Detection > ===== > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.