Guest guest Posted July 28, 2004 Report Share Posted July 28, 2004 Thanks Rajan for responding! I am just trying to systematise the discussion for the benifit of all. It doesnot mean one is scientific and other is not.Anyway here is a problem about marriage and lets see whether we can provide any solution. BIRTH-DATA: 02-Apr-1968; 09-45 AM Japanese Stanadard Time(+9:00 Zone, No day light Saving); 135E30 long, 34N40 lat. AYANAMSHA: LAHIRI(23:25) PLANETARY POSITION and STARLORDS: As 01:35 Ge Mrigsira Ma Su 18:56 Pi Revati Me Mo 03:40 Ta Krittika Su Ma 10:18 Ar Aswini Ke Me 28:15 Aq P.Bhadra Ju JuR 03:01 Le Magha Ke Ve 28:08 Aq P.Bhadra Ju Sa 21:34 Pi Revati Me Ra 25:17 Pi Revati Me Ke 25:17 Vi Chitra Ma Vimshottari Dashas ================== Su Apr-02-1968 Mo Feb-07-1971 Ma Feb-06-1981 Ra Feb-07-1988 Ju Feb-07-2006 Sa Feb-07-2022 Me Feb-06-2041 Ke Feb-07-2058 Ve Feb-06-2065 QUERY/PROBLEM : When is this person going to get married ? Can we try providing a satisfactory solution to the needy? KAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 Hello friend, If this is the organization you are talking abotu, then almost every astrology software does it No offence, I am all for the idea, only I want it to mature like wine and not evaporate like spirit !!! --- hanya_shingyo <kadrudra wrote: > Thanks Rajan for responding! I am just trying to > systematise the > discussion for the benifit of all. > It doesnot mean one is scientific and other is > not.Anyway here is a > problem about marriage and lets see > whether we can provide any solution. > > BIRTH-DATA: 02-Apr-1968; 09-45 AM Japanese Stanadard > Time(+9:00 Zone, > No day light Saving); 135E30 long, 34N40 lat. > > AYANAMSHA: LAHIRI(23:25) > > PLANETARY POSITION and STARLORDS: > > As 01:35 Ge Mrigsira Ma > Su 18:56 Pi Revati Me > Mo 03:40 Ta Krittika Su > Ma 10:18 Ar Aswini Ke > Me 28:15 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > JuR 03:01 Le Magha Ke > Ve 28:08 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > Sa 21:34 Pi Revati Me > Ra 25:17 Pi Revati Me > Ke 25:17 Vi Chitra Ma > > Vimshottari Dashas > ================== > Su Apr-02-1968 > Mo Feb-07-1971 > Ma Feb-06-1981 > Ra Feb-07-1988 > Ju Feb-07-2006 > Sa Feb-07-2022 > Me Feb-06-2041 > Ke Feb-07-2058 > Ve Feb-06-2065 > > QUERY/PROBLEM : When is this person going to get > married ? > > Can we try providing a satisfactory solution to the > needy? > > KAD > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 Dear friend, You have prepared the chart correctly, as per the given data. But working with the concepts of ruling planets of the moment should be matching with that of the chart, i see major difference here. Would you please check the time, date etc and tell. There is definately some mistake here. However , if you say that chart data is correct. Prediction would be that Jupiter dasa with its start will give him marriage. How ? we can discuss. Inder - In , "hanya_shingyo" <kadrudra> wrote: > Thanks Rajan for responding! I am just trying to systematise the > discussion for the benifit of all. > It doesnot mean one is scientific and other is not.Anyway here is a > problem about marriage and lets see > whether we can provide any solution. > > BIRTH-DATA: 02-Apr-1968; 09-45 AM Japanese Stanadard Time(+9:00 Zone, > No day light Saving); 135E30 long, 34N40 lat. > > AYANAMSHA: LAHIRI(23:25) > > PLANETARY POSITION and STARLORDS: > > As 01:35 Ge Mrigsira Ma > Su 18:56 Pi Revati Me > Mo 03:40 Ta Krittika Su > Ma 10:18 Ar Aswini Ke > Me 28:15 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > JuR 03:01 Le Magha Ke > Ve 28:08 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > Sa 21:34 Pi Revati Me > Ra 25:17 Pi Revati Me > Ke 25:17 Vi Chitra Ma > > Vimshottari Dashas > ================== > Su Apr-02-1968 > Mo Feb-07-1971 > Ma Feb-06-1981 > Ra Feb-07-1988 > Ju Feb-07-2006 > Sa Feb-07-2022 > Me Feb-06-2041 > Ke Feb-07-2058 > Ve Feb-06-2065 > > QUERY/PROBLEM : When is this person going to get married ? > > Can we try providing a satisfactory solution to the needy? > > KAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 Sorry if I did not make my request clearly, earlier. What I was hoping from you was to put down an example message/response in the organized, detailed manner that you proposed everyone must respond in this forum. You only posted the chart output from some program. How about posting an example analysis using the style, format, details that you asked others to. I meant that kind of example! RR , "hanya_shingyo" <kadrudra> wrote: > Thanks Rajan for responding! I am just trying to systematise the > discussion for the benifit of all. > It doesnot mean one is scientific and other is not.Anyway here is a > problem about marriage and lets see > whether we can provide any solution. > > BIRTH-DATA: 02-Apr-1968; 09-45 AM Japanese Stanadard Time(+9:00 Zone, > No day light Saving); 135E30 long, 34N40 lat. > > AYANAMSHA: LAHIRI(23:25) > > PLANETARY POSITION and STARLORDS: > > As 01:35 Ge Mrigsira Ma > Su 18:56 Pi Revati Me > Mo 03:40 Ta Krittika Su > Ma 10:18 Ar Aswini Ke > Me 28:15 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > JuR 03:01 Le Magha Ke > Ve 28:08 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > Sa 21:34 Pi Revati Me > Ra 25:17 Pi Revati Me > Ke 25:17 Vi Chitra Ma > > Vimshottari Dashas > ================== > Su Apr-02-1968 > Mo Feb-07-1971 > Ma Feb-06-1981 > Ra Feb-07-1988 > Ju Feb-07-2006 > Sa Feb-07-2022 > Me Feb-06-2041 > Ke Feb-07-2058 > Ve Feb-06-2065 > > QUERY/PROBLEM : When is this person going to get married ? > > Can we try providing a satisfactory solution to the needy? > > KAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 Hello Kad, I think the what you meant was discussing a common format for a solution not the problem. I hope you do get the difference between the two. The given below format caters to the latter rather than the former. Moreover even if the below is taken as common format for asking for a solution to a problem, then also i do doubt how many people will furnish details like Vimshottari Dashas details etc. To countercheck you can check the formats of the questions asked in the group. Anyways that is not the point here and the complexities of a solution(or a reading) should be understood first in order to get a clear picture. Gaurav , "hanya_shingyo" <kadrudra> wrote: > Thanks Rajan for responding! I am just trying to systematise the > discussion for the benifit of all. > It doesnot mean one is scientific and other is not.Anyway here is a > problem about marriage and lets see > whether we can provide any solution. > > BIRTH-DATA: 02-Apr-1968; 09-45 AM Japanese Stanadard Time(+9:00 Zone, > No day light Saving); 135E30 long, 34N40 lat. > > AYANAMSHA: LAHIRI(23:25) > > PLANETARY POSITION and STARLORDS: > > As 01:35 Ge Mrigsira Ma > Su 18:56 Pi Revati Me > Mo 03:40 Ta Krittika Su > Ma 10:18 Ar Aswini Ke > Me 28:15 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > JuR 03:01 Le Magha Ke > Ve 28:08 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > Sa 21:34 Pi Revati Me > Ra 25:17 Pi Revati Me > Ke 25:17 Vi Chitra Ma > > Vimshottari Dashas > ================== > Su Apr-02-1968 > Mo Feb-07-1971 > Ma Feb-06-1981 > Ra Feb-07-1988 > Ju Feb-07-2006 > Sa Feb-07-2022 > Me Feb-06-2041 > Ke Feb-07-2058 > Ve Feb-06-2065 > > QUERY/PROBLEM : When is this person going to get married ? > > Can we try providing a satisfactory solution to the needy? > > KAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 If I may add to this, I think it is best to just post the birthdata etc. rather than a chart. Different programs, different parameters which will mean that individuals would have to recalculate anyway. Posting chart details would be wasting the limited bandwidth and the poster's time. I hope administrators do not make these details a requirement -- then again, maybe that would reduce the number of reading requests, which could be good or bad depending on situation and the individual concerned! RR , "Gaurav Sharma" <gauravkom> wrote: > Hello Kad, > > I think the what you meant was discussing a common format for a > solution not the problem. I hope you do get the difference between > the two. The given below format caters to the latter rather than the > former. Moreover even if the below is taken as common format for > asking for a solution to a problem, then also i do doubt how many > people will furnish details like Vimshottari Dashas details etc. To > countercheck you can check the formats of the questions asked in the > group. Anyways that is not the point here and the complexities of a > solution(or a reading) should be understood first in order to get a > clear picture. > > Gaurav > > > , "hanya_shingyo" > <kadrudra> wrote: > > Thanks Rajan for responding! I am just trying to systematise the > > discussion for the benifit of all. > > It doesnot mean one is scientific and other is not.Anyway here is a > > problem about marriage and lets see > > whether we can provide any solution. > > > > BIRTH-DATA: 02-Apr-1968; 09-45 AM Japanese Stanadard Time(+9:00 > Zone, > > No day light Saving); 135E30 long, 34N40 lat. > > > > AYANAMSHA: LAHIRI(23:25) > > > > PLANETARY POSITION and STARLORDS: > > > > As 01:35 Ge Mrigsira Ma > > Su 18:56 Pi Revati Me > > Mo 03:40 Ta Krittika Su > > Ma 10:18 Ar Aswini Ke > > Me 28:15 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > > JuR 03:01 Le Magha Ke > > Ve 28:08 Aq P.Bhadra Ju > > Sa 21:34 Pi Revati Me > > Ra 25:17 Pi Revati Me > > Ke 25:17 Vi Chitra Ma > > > > Vimshottari Dashas > > ================== > > Su Apr-02-1968 > > Mo Feb-07-1971 > > Ma Feb-06-1981 > > Ra Feb-07-1988 > > Ju Feb-07-2006 > > Sa Feb-07-2022 > > Me Feb-06-2041 > > Ke Feb-07-2058 > > Ve Feb-06-2065 > > > > QUERY/PROBLEM : When is this person going to get married ? > > > > Can we try providing a satisfactory solution to the needy? > > > > KAD Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.