Group discussion without Conclusion has no meaning!

[Guest guest]

I am not asking anyone to EXPLAIN the process of judgement, but

asking to outline the method adopted so that people who

follow the same method or from same school of thought are benefitted

at a single glance. And people looking for something

will defintely find it easily if it is categorised in title itself.

What all MUST understand is that the group discussions must benefit

the group really and not just only a single querist.

If anyone needs to help an individual without discussing in group, e-

mail him/her individually!! The need to discuss in this group

is to arrive at the common conclusion(which is the reality since

there is only ONE DEFINITE TRUTH whatever may be the analyses)

from different angles of analysis and views, adopting different

principles from different school of thoughts.

I know that no two astrologers agree in analysis and prediction but

what happens is only ONE single outcome which means,

one of the analyses went wrong! The real study starts then in

analysing what made one go wrong and the other correct, which

actually is a post-mortem but serves as a step of success for the

next prediction.

 

We all learn from mistakes we make, lets make even mistakes

systematically; and then only we can call astrology a science!

If you are not systematic dont call yourself scientific

astrologer/astro-student and then you will be just the guess work

intellectual!

 

Speaking about time required in formatting....its just for the first

time! From next letter its just a copy and paste of

techniques and tools used most of the times and what differs is

palnetary positions/ chart and prediction.So please start

discussing in group and arrive at a conclusion to tackle a problem

and sum up to give the needy a perfect single answer, whatever

may be the analyses involved.Finally what matters is result and it

can not be different.

 

For example, in case of life and death query... you may feel YES or

NO.That's ur analysis but dont give this answer directly

to querist...lets discuss within ourselves to share our views and

arrive at the definite truth.Thats is the aim of group discussion.

Because I see simply opinions flying around in this group and no

conclusion at all! Hope most of u understand what i am saying!

 

Kad,

Japan

[Guest guest]

Sounds good, but would be even better if you give an example, using

any example chart maybe use one of the older quiz examples that were

posted by Tanvir. It will make things a lot clearer for the non-

scientists/non-scientific individuals amongst us.

 

RR

 

, "hanya_shingyo"

<kadrudra> wrote:

> I am not asking anyone to EXPLAIN the process of judgement, but

> asking to outline the method adopted so that people who

> follow the same method or from same school of thought are

benefitted

> at a single glance. And people looking for something

> will defintely find it easily if it is categorised in title itself.

> What all MUST understand is that the group discussions must

benefit

> the group really and not just only a single querist.

> If anyone needs to help an individual without discussing in group,

e-

> mail him/her individually!! The need to discuss in this group

> is to arrive at the common conclusion(which is the reality since

> there is only ONE DEFINITE TRUTH whatever may be the analyses)

> from different angles of analysis and views, adopting different

> principles from different school of thoughts.

> I know that no two astrologers agree in analysis and prediction

but

> what happens is only ONE single outcome which means,

> one of the analyses went wrong! The real study starts then in

> analysing what made one go wrong and the other correct, which

> actually is a post-mortem but serves as a step of success for the

> next prediction.

>

> We all learn from mistakes we make, lets make even mistakes

> systematically; and then only we can call astrology a science!

> If you are not systematic dont call yourself scientific

> astrologer/astro-student and then you will be just the guess work

> intellectual!

>

> Speaking about time required in formatting....its just for the

first

> time! From next letter its just a copy and paste of

> techniques and tools used most of the times and what differs is

> palnetary positions/ chart and prediction.So please start

> discussing in group and arrive at a conclusion to tackle a problem

> and sum up to give the needy a perfect single answer, whatever

> may be the analyses involved.Finally what matters is result and it

> can not be different.

>

> For example, in case of life and death query... you may feel YES

or

> NO.That's ur analysis but dont give this answer directly

> to querist...lets discuss within ourselves to share our views and

> arrive at the definite truth.Thats is the aim of group discussion.

> Because I see simply opinions flying around in this group and no

> conclusion at all! Hope most of u understand what i am saying!

>

> Kad,

> Japan

[Guest guest]

Hello,

 

If astrology should reflect life, then there cant be

clear conclusions, there are just possibilities to be

explored !!!

 

You sound like a graduate just out of school willing

to take over the world !!! there are lot more issues

to take care of in any combined effort between people

.... and that demands brainstorming together .. and

brainstorming can never be organized !!

 

--- hanya_shingyo <kadrudra wrote:

 

> I am not asking anyone to EXPLAIN the process of

> judgement, but

> asking to outline the method adopted so that people

> who

> follow the same method or from same school of

> thought are benefitted

> at a single glance. And people looking for something

> will defintely find it easily if it is categorised

> in title itself.

> What all MUST understand is that the group

> discussions must benefit

> the group really and not just only a single querist.

> If anyone needs to help an individual without

> discussing in group, e-

> mail him/her individually!! The need to discuss in

> this group

> is to arrive at the common conclusion(which is the

> reality since

> there is only ONE DEFINITE TRUTH whatever may be the

> analyses)

> from different angles of analysis and views,

> adopting different

> principles from different school of thoughts.

> I know that no two astrologers agree in analysis and

> prediction but

> what happens is only ONE single outcome which means,

> one of the analyses went wrong! The real study

> starts then in

> analysing what made one go wrong and the other

> correct, which

> actually is a post-mortem but serves as a step of

> success for the

> next prediction.

>

> We all learn from mistakes we make, lets make even

> mistakes

> systematically; and then only we can call astrology

> a science!

> If you are not systematic dont call yourself

> scientific

> astrologer/astro-student and then you will be just

> the guess work

> intellectual!

>

> Speaking about time required in formatting....its

> just for the first

> time! From next letter its just a copy and paste of

> techniques and tools used most of the times and what

> differs is

> palnetary positions/ chart and prediction.So please

> start

> discussing in group and arrive at a conclusion to

> tackle a problem

> and sum up to give the needy a perfect single

> answer, whatever

> may be the analyses involved.Finally what matters is

> result and it

> can not be different.

>

> For example, in case of life and death query... you

> may feel YES or

> NO.That's ur analysis but dont give this answer

> directly

> to querist...lets discuss within ourselves to share

> our views and

> arrive at the definite truth.Thats is the aim of

> group discussion.

> Because I see simply opinions flying around in this

> group and no

> conclusion at all! Hope most of u understand what i

> am saying!

>

> Kad,

> Japan

>

>

>