knowldge of past life and astrology Rohini ji

[Guest guest]

Respected Rohini Ranjan ji,

Thanks for your explanation about Trikal Gyana and also about

Jyotishmati Nadi and Saints.

 

I would also be obliged if you can tell me if knowledge of Astrology

is got through praying, Ketu, Ganapathy or Rahu?

Some people say Ketu and Ganapathy are same and they give ultimate

knowledge.

Some maintain that Rahu is the lord of Time so Rahu gives

astrological knowledge.

Some group people say Guru is the lord of knowledge. Hence Guru

(Brihaspathy) must be prayed.

Thus for me, the picture is very confusing.

 

If you can throw more light on this, I would be richer in knowledge.

Rgds

 

VB/HT

 

 

 

, "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

wrote:

> Vidyut,

>

> On a list, Shri KN Rao had quoted from one of his books (I think

the

> saints one or one of the others) and indicated that as jyotishis

> progress on their path/sadhna, they activate a nadi called

> jyotishmati nadi (it is described in Patanjali's yoga sutra). When

> this becomes active, one gains knowledge or more truly

> simultaneously the awareness of the lifetime of the soul. Once

> activated, the individual does not need a horoscope or charts etc

to

> tell about someone's past or future, etc. They can even tell the

> correct future or past from a wrong horoscope (they are not using

> the charts anyway!). So, obviously, that state has nothing to do

> with jyotish and must not be confused with the ability to look into

> the past or future using standard astrology! These individuals

> become psychic. I know that some individuals use the term 'psychic'

> in a deregatory sense or in a negative way, but that does not

change

> the facts. My advice would be to focus on jyotish as a sadhna and

> let things unfold, rather than trying to force them, etc.

>

> Tri=three

> Kaal=time

> Gna = knower

>

> One who knows the three times (past,present and future)

> simultaneously is a trikalagna. I think the simultaneous is an

> important keyword there.

>

> I hope this helps.

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

>

> , "vidyut_bhatt"

> <vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:

> > -

> > Hello Vineet ji,

> > You are talking of past birth.

> > This falls under Trikaal gyan.

> > Some time back, the question of TRIKAAL GYAN YOGA was hotly

> discussed

> > in another Elite Group specializing in Higher and Intricate form

> of

> > Astrology.

> >

> > Trikaal in samskrit means Past Present And Future.

> >

> > I asked a very simle doubt to knowledgable Gurus

> >

> > WHAT IS TRIKAAL GYAN ?

> >

> > Is it the Knowledge of Past , present and future of a person in

> his

> > life time

> > or

> > Knowledge of His past birth, present birth and future birth ?

> >

> > I am yet to get answer from them.

> >

> > Will Some knowledgable friend here throw some more light on my

> > question ?

> >

> > I will be highly obliged.

> >

> > Rgds

> > VB/HT

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -- In , vineet sharma

> > <vineetkbc> wrote:

> > > Hi All

> > >

> > > I've been the member of your group for about a month.

> > > Out of curosity, i also asked a question, which,

> > > nevertheless, not replied by anybody. It was,

> > > regarding, of course, about my professtional career.

> > >

> > > I have also seen that almost everybody wants to know

> > > about the future (marg, etc.).

> > >

> > > But I have a question, is astrology also one of ways

> > > of finding out about someone's past life. If yes, then

> > > its an intersting question, i feel, isn't ??

> > >

> > > If the answer is affirmative, then what i was in my

> > > previous birth - DOB: 25.03.1976 in delhi at 4.25 a.m.

> > >

> > >

> > > It would be pleasure, if you guys could enlighten on

> > > this issue of "knowldge of past life and astrology"

> > >

> > > thanks and regards

> > >

> > > vineet

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year

> > > http://smallbusiness.promotions./offer

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately, this is true for other things in jyotish as well.

Different people will see the same results in different patterns of

planets. It may be counterintuitive, because we all like to think of

jyotish as a very rigid scientific discipline where 1+1 must =2.

However, unless much of the jyotish population is unmatta, how can

one explain the use of different ayanamshas, different dashas or

rather different combinations of dashas and yet the outcomes are

reasonably comparable (in terms of success). Each camp or cohort may

think that they are the only one with the key and some publicly

state so, but it is all very complex and anecdotal.

 

Something like jyotish which describes and goes into all facets of

human experience could not possibly fit into one or two planets or

signs, etc. Even for something as technical as medicine or

engineering, there would not be one or few combinations or a planet

that would be the be all, end all. How can the same be expected of

jyotish, which has so many different flavour and different ways of

thinking and deducing. It is quite possible that different jyotishis

will have different leanings and skews and while some may be more

given to listening to innersource and japam etc., others might like

to approach the vidya in a more linear, fact-based manner. Mercury

and mars may indicate one's comfort in a worldly, linear framework,

jupiter may give scholarship and broad knowledge of the field and a

great ability to apply many different techniques in a complex

framework and a leaning towards teaching astrology, ketu may make

one more intuitive, rahu may make one focused more on worldly

issues, sun may give a leaning for mundane or political astrology,

saturn may bring to the fore someone who is somewhat sceptical and

needs that there be a very common sense approach, venus may bring

into the field an organizer and researcher, and so on.

 

, "vidyut_bhatt"

<vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:

>

> Respected Rohini Ranjan ji,

> Thanks for your explanation about Trikal Gyana and also about

> Jyotishmati Nadi and Saints.

>

> I would also be obliged if you can tell me if knowledge of

Astrology

> is got through praying, Ketu, Ganapathy or Rahu?

> Some people say Ketu and Ganapathy are same and they give ultimate

> knowledge.

> Some maintain that Rahu is the lord of Time so Rahu gives

> astrological knowledge.

> Some group people say Guru is the lord of knowledge. Hence Guru

> (Brihaspathy) must be prayed.

> Thus for me, the picture is very confusing.

>

> If you can throw more light on this, I would be richer in

knowledge.

> Rgds

>

> VB/HT

>

>

>

> , "rohiniranjan"

<rrgb@s...>

> wrote:

> > Vidyut,

> >

> > On a list, Shri KN Rao had quoted from one of his books (I think

> the

> > saints one or one of the others) and indicated that as jyotishis

> > progress on their path/sadhna, they activate a nadi called

> > jyotishmati nadi (it is described in Patanjali's yoga sutra).

When

> > this becomes active, one gains knowledge or more truly

> > simultaneously the awareness of the lifetime of the soul. Once

> > activated, the individual does not need a horoscope or charts

etc

> to

> > tell about someone's past or future, etc. They can even tell the

> > correct future or past from a wrong horoscope (they are not

using

> > the charts anyway!). So, obviously, that state has nothing to do

> > with jyotish and must not be confused with the ability to look

into

> > the past or future using standard astrology! These individuals

> > become psychic. I know that some individuals use the

term 'psychic'

> > in a deregatory sense or in a negative way, but that does not

> change

> > the facts. My advice would be to focus on jyotish as a sadhna

and

> > let things unfold, rather than trying to force them, etc.

> >

> > Tri=three

> > Kaal=time

> > Gna = knower

> >

> > One who knows the three times (past,present and future)

> > simultaneously is a trikalagna. I think the simultaneous is an

> > important keyword there.

> >

> > I hope this helps.

> >

> > Rohiniranjan

> >

> >

> > , "vidyut_bhatt"

> > <vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:

> > > -

> > > Hello Vineet ji,

> > > You are talking of past birth.

> > > This falls under Trikaal gyan.

> > > Some time back, the question of TRIKAAL GYAN YOGA was hotly

> > discussed

> > > in another Elite Group specializing in Higher and Intricate

form

> > of

> > > Astrology.

> > >

> > > Trikaal in samskrit means Past Present And Future.

> > >

> > > I asked a very simle doubt to knowledgable Gurus

> > >

> > > WHAT IS TRIKAAL GYAN ?

> > >

> > > Is it the Knowledge of Past , present and future of a person

in

> > his

> > > life time

> > > or

> > > Knowledge of His past birth, present birth and future birth ?

> > >

> > > I am yet to get answer from them.

> > >

> > > Will Some knowledgable friend here throw some more light on

my

> > > question ?

> > >

> > > I will be highly obliged.

> > >

> > > Rgds

> > > VB/HT

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > -- In , vineet sharma

> > > <vineetkbc> wrote:

> > > > Hi All

> > > >

> > > > I've been the member of your group for about a month.

> > > > Out of curosity, i also asked a question, which,

> > > > nevertheless, not replied by anybody. It was,

> > > > regarding, of course, about my professtional career.

> > > >

> > > > I have also seen that almost everybody wants to know

> > > > about the future (marg, etc.).

> > > >

> > > > But I have a question, is astrology also one of ways

> > > > of finding out about someone's past life. If yes, then

> > > > its an intersting question, i feel, isn't ??

> > > >

> > > > If the answer is affirmative, then what i was in my

> > > > previous birth - DOB: 25.03.1976 in delhi at 4.25 a.m.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > It would be pleasure, if you guys could enlighten on

> > > > this issue of "knowldge of past life and astrology"

> > > >

> > > > thanks and regards

> > > >

> > > > vineet

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Domains – Claim yours for only $14.70/year

> > > > http://smallbusiness.promotions./offer

[Guest guest]

Hello Rohini Ranjan ji,

 

Your answer has left me more confused.

You have not written anything about praying which Planet/God for

Trikaal Gyana in Astrology.

 

Can I request Tanveer ji or Sri Niraj ji to throw more light on this?

 

Rgds,

VB/HT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

wrote:

> Unfortunately, this is true for other things in jyotish as well.

> Different people will see the same results in different patterns of

> planets. It may be counterintuitive, because we all like to think

of

> jyotish as a very rigid scientific discipline where 1+1 must =2.

> However, unless much of the jyotish population is unmatta, how can

> one explain the use of different ayanamshas, different dashas or

> rather different combinations of dashas and yet the outcomes are

> reasonably comparable (in terms of success). Each camp or cohort

may

> think that they are the only one with the key and some publicly

> state so, but it is all very complex and anecdotal.

>

> Something like jyotish which describes and goes into all facets of

> human experience could not possibly fit into one or two planets or

> signs, etc. Even for something as technical as medicine or

> engineering, there would not be one or few combinations or a planet

> that would be the be all, end all. How can the same be expected of

> jyotish, which has so many different flavour and different ways of

> thinking and deducing. It is quite possible that different

jyotishis

> will have different leanings and skews and while some may be more

> given to listening to innersource and japam etc., others might like

> to approach the vidya in a more linear, fact-based manner. Mercury

> and mars may indicate one's comfort in a worldly, linear framework,

> jupiter may give scholarship and broad knowledge of the field and a

> great ability to apply many different techniques in a complex

> framework and a leaning towards teaching astrology, ketu may make

> one more intuitive, rahu may make one focused more on worldly

> issues, sun may give a leaning for mundane or political astrology,

> saturn may bring to the fore someone who is somewhat sceptical and

> needs that there be a very common sense approach, venus may bring

> into the field an organizer and researcher, and so on.

>

..com/offer

[Guest guest]

Sorry about that, did not wish to tie your understanding in a knot,

but seems like we approach astrology in different ways :-)

 

My approach to jyotish is not devotional or ritualistic. To be

honest and candid, I do not sincerely believe that praying makes one

an astrologer. It is a vidya which requires hard work, lot of

practical experience, just like other skills. Prayer may help in

stabilising one's mind, in gaining concentration etc., but there is

no rambaan prayer that will replace the normal channels of learning.

 

Rohiniranjan

 

, "vidyut_bhatt"

<vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:

>

> Hello Rohini Ranjan ji,

>

> Your answer has left me more confused.

> You have not written anything about praying which Planet/God for

> Trikaal Gyana in Astrology.

>

> Can I request Tanveer ji or Sri Niraj ji to throw more light on

this?

>

> Rgds,

> VB/HT

>

, "rohiniranjan"

<rrgb@s...>

> wrote:

> > Unfortunately, this is true for other things in jyotish as well.

> > Different people will see the same results in different patterns

of

> > planets. It may be counterintuitive, because we all like to

think

> of

> > jyotish as a very rigid scientific discipline where 1+1 must =2.

> > However, unless much of the jyotish population is unmatta, how

can

> > one explain the use of different ayanamshas, different dashas or

> > rather different combinations of dashas and yet the outcomes are

> > reasonably comparable (in terms of success). Each camp or cohort

> may

> > think that they are the only one with the key and some publicly

> > state so, but it is all very complex and anecdotal.

> >

> > Something like jyotish which describes and goes into all facets

of

> > human experience could not possibly fit into one or two planets

or

> > signs, etc. Even for something as technical as medicine or

> > engineering, there would not be one or few combinations or a

planet

> > that would be the be all, end all. How can the same be expected

of

> > jyotish, which has so many different flavour and different ways

of

> > thinking and deducing. It is quite possible that different

> jyotishis

> > will have different leanings and skews and while some may be

more

> > given to listening to innersource and japam etc., others might

like

> > to approach the vidya in a more linear, fact-based manner.

Mercury

> > and mars may indicate one's comfort in a worldly, linear

framework,

> > jupiter may give scholarship and broad knowledge of the field

and a

> > great ability to apply many different techniques in a complex

> > framework and a leaning towards teaching astrology, ketu may

make

> > one more intuitive, rahu may make one focused more on worldly

> > issues, sun may give a leaning for mundane or political

astrology,

> > saturn may bring to the fore someone who is somewhat sceptical

and

> > needs that there be a very common sense approach, venus may

bring

> > into the field an organizer and researcher, and so on.

> >

> .com/offer

[Guest guest]

Hello everybody,

 

I have been referred this group by my would-be-wife Satya (I call her

that, she is Satyabhama).

 

Just had the lunch, so thought of joining in this innovative

discussion.

 

Past Life..Hmmm...and what do we have here position of Sun...thats

not fair...ego holds us to the present, it is the release of that

which we should link to the past life....

 

See Saturn, its Ashtavarga strength, its nak. lord, its sub, its D-1

house, trace it to D-9, D-10, D-20 and D-45. See the houses, list

them, in the order mentioned and see if u can find any common

conjunction or house.

 

The most prominent trace will determine your past 1 birth, the second

most trace will determine your past 2nd. birth etc.

 

Swamiji (Vivekananda) knew about his 36 past births but he didnot

know astrology. Infact he detested it. That proves that this is not

the only way. There are more sublime ways to do the same. This is a

more theoritical approach.

 

Must catch up with my next lecture...See ya guys!!

 

Good group...

 

Padma

, "rohiniranjan" <rrgb@s...>

wrote:

> Sorry about that, did not wish to tie your understanding in a knot,

> but seems like we approach astrology in different ways :-)

>

> My approach to jyotish is not devotional or ritualistic. To be

> honest and candid, I do not sincerely believe that praying makes

one

> an astrologer. It is a vidya which requires hard work, lot of

> practical experience, just like other skills. Prayer may help in

> stabilising one's mind, in gaining concentration etc., but there is

> no rambaan prayer that will replace the normal channels of learning.

>

> Rohiniranjan

>

> , "vidyut_bhatt"

> <vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:

> >

> > Hello Rohini Ranjan ji,

> >

> > Your answer has left me more confused.

> > You have not written anything about praying which Planet/God for

> > Trikaal Gyana in Astrology.

> >

> > Can I request Tanveer ji or Sri Niraj ji to throw more light on

> this?

> >

> > Rgds,

> > VB/HT

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , "rohiniranjan"

> <rrgb@s...>

> > wrote:

> > > Unfortunately, this is true for other things in jyotish as

well.

> > > Different people will see the same results in different

patterns

> of

> > > planets. It may be counterintuitive, because we all like to

> think

> > of

> > > jyotish as a very rigid scientific discipline where 1+1 must

=2.

> > > However, unless much of the jyotish population is unmatta, how

> can

> > > one explain the use of different ayanamshas, different dashas

or

> > > rather different combinations of dashas and yet the outcomes

are

> > > reasonably comparable (in terms of success). Each camp or

cohort

> > may

> > > think that they are the only one with the key and some publicly

> > > state so, but it is all very complex and anecdotal.

> > >

> > > Something like jyotish which describes and goes into all facets

> of

> > > human experience could not possibly fit into one or two planets

> or

> > > signs, etc. Even for something as technical as medicine or

> > > engineering, there would not be one or few combinations or a

> planet

> > > that would be the be all, end all. How can the same be expected

> of

> > > jyotish, which has so many different flavour and different ways

> of

> > > thinking and deducing. It is quite possible that different

> > jyotishis

> > > will have different leanings and skews and while some may be

> more

> > > given to listening to innersource and japam etc., others might

> like

> > > to approach the vidya in a more linear, fact-based manner.

> Mercury

> > > and mars may indicate one's comfort in a worldly, linear

> framework,

> > > jupiter may give scholarship and broad knowledge of the field

> and a

> > > great ability to apply many different techniques in a complex

> > > framework and a leaning towards teaching astrology, ketu may

> make

> > > one more intuitive, rahu may make one focused more on worldly

> > > issues, sun may give a leaning for mundane or political

> astrology,

> > > saturn may bring to the fore someone who is somewhat sceptical

> and

> > > needs that there be a very common sense approach, venus may

> bring

> > > into the field an organizer and researcher, and so on.

> > >

> > .com/offer

[Guest guest]

Dear Padma ji

 

Could you please explain Past Life incidents with help of examples. Its interesting

 

Love

 

RG

-

Dr Padmapani Bagde

 

Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:01 AM

Re: knowldge of past life and astrology Rohini ji

Hello everybody,I have been referred this group by my would-be-wife Satya (I

call her that, she is Satyabhama).Just had the lunch, so thought of joining in

this innovative discussion.Past Life..Hmmm...and what do we have here position

of Sun...thats not fair...ego holds us to the present, it is the release of

that which we should link to the past life....See Saturn, its Ashtavarga

strength, its nak. lord, its sub, its D-1 house, trace it to D-9, D-10, D-20

and D-45. See the houses, list them, in the order mentioned and see if u can

find any common conjunction or house.The most prominent trace will determine

your past 1 birth, the second most trace will determine your past 2nd. birth

etc.Swamiji (Vivekananda) knew about his 36 past births but he didnot know

astrology. Infact he detested it. That proves that this is not the only way.

There are more sublime ways to do the same. This is a more theoritical

approach.Must catch up with my next lecture...See ya guys!!Good

group...Padma, "rohiniranjan"

<rrgb@s...> wrote:> Sorry about that, did not wish to tie your understanding in

a knot, > but seems like we approach astrology in different ways :-)> > My

approach to jyotish is not devotional or ritualistic. To be > honest and

candid, I do not sincerely believe that praying makes one > an astrologer. It

is a vidya which requires hard work, lot of > practical experience, just like

other skills. Prayer may help in > stabilising one's mind, in gaining

concentration etc., but there is > no rambaan prayer that will replace the

normal channels of learning.> > Rohiniranjan> > --- In

, "vidyut_bhatt" > <vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:>

> > > Hello Rohini Ranjan ji,> > > > Your answer has left me more confused.> >

You have not written anything about praying which Planet/God for > > Trikaal

Gyana in Astrology.> > > > Can I request Tanveer ji or Sri Niraj ji to throw

more light on > this?> > > > Rgds,> > VB/HT> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---

In , "rohiniranjan" > <rrgb@s...> > > wrote:> >

> Unfortunately, this is true for other things in jyotish as well. > > >

Different people will see the same results in different patterns > of > > >

planets. It may be counterintuitive, because we all like to > think > > of > >

> jyotish as a very rigid scientific discipline where 1+1 must =2. > > >

However, unless much of the jyotish population is unmatta, how > can > > > one

explain the use of different ayanamshas, different dashas or > > > rather

different combinations of dashas and yet the outcomes are > > > reasonably

comparable (in terms of success). Each camp or cohort > > may > > > think that

they are the only one with the key and some publicly > > > state so, but it is

all very complex and anecdotal.> > > > > > Something like jyotish which

describes and goes into all facets > of > > > human experience could not

possibly fit into one or two planets > or > > > signs, etc. Even for something

as technical as medicine or > > > engineering, there would not be one or few

combinations or a > planet > > > that would be the be all, end all. How can the

same be expected > of > > > jyotish, which has so many different flavour and

different ways > of > > > thinking and deducing. It is quite possible that

different > > jyotishis > > > will have different leanings and skews and while

some may be > more > > > given to listening to innersource and japam etc.,

others might > like > > > to approach the vidya in a more linear, fact-based

manner. > Mercury > > > and mars may indicate one's comfort in a worldly,

linear > framework, > > > jupiter may give scholarship and broad knowledge of

the field > and a > > > great ability to apply many different techniques in a

complex > > > framework and a leaning towards teaching astrology, ketu may >

make > > > one more intuitive, rahu may make one focused more on worldly > > >

issues, sun may give a leaning for mundane or political > astrology, > > >

saturn may bring to the fore someone who is somewhat sceptical > and > > >

needs that there be a very common sense approach, venus may > bring > > > into

the field an organizer and researcher, and so on.> > > > > .com/offer~! LIFE

MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

[Guest guest]

But Doctor ji, how would you prove beyond the shadow of doubt that

those combinations indeed work? Surely a man devoted to the

scientific healing craft (assuming you are a man of modern medicine)

can see the problem there. Sometimes genetic predispositions can be

confused for rebirths. It is fairly common in India to make the

rebirth link between a great grandparent and the great grandson, for

instance. Perhaps those two separate individuals are sharing genes

(the expressed one, obviously) rather than souls (using soul in the

common parlance which may be a mistaken concept itself).

 

I hope you will be back after supper. This astrology thing can be

addictive, particularly when one comes to it willingly from a

medical background!

 

 

, "Dr Padmapani Bagde"

<dr_padmapani_bagde> wrote:

> Hello everybody,

>

> I have been referred this group by my would-be-wife Satya (I call

her

> that, she is Satyabhama).

>

> Just had the lunch, so thought of joining in this innovative

> discussion.

>

> Past Life..Hmmm...and what do we have here position of Sun...thats

> not fair...ego holds us to the present, it is the release of that

> which we should link to the past life....

>

> See Saturn, its Ashtavarga strength, its nak. lord, its sub, its D-

1

> house, trace it to D-9, D-10, D-20 and D-45. See the houses, list

> them, in the order mentioned and see if u can find any common

> conjunction or house.

>

> The most prominent trace will determine your past 1 birth, the

second

> most trace will determine your past 2nd. birth etc.

>

> Swamiji (Vivekananda) knew about his 36 past births but he didnot

> know astrology. Infact he detested it. That proves that this is

not

> the only way. There are more sublime ways to do the same. This is

a

> more theoritical approach.

>

> Must catch up with my next lecture...See ya guys!!

>

> Good group...

>

> Padma

> , "rohiniranjan"

<rrgb@s...>

> wrote:

> > Sorry about that, did not wish to tie your understanding in a

knot,

> > but seems like we approach astrology in different ways :-)

> >

> > My approach to jyotish is not devotional or ritualistic. To be

> > honest and candid, I do not sincerely believe that praying makes

> one

> > an astrologer. It is a vidya which requires hard work, lot of

> > practical experience, just like other skills. Prayer may help in

> > stabilising one's mind, in gaining concentration etc., but there

is

> > no rambaan prayer that will replace the normal channels of

learning.

> >

> > Rohiniranjan

> >

> > , "vidyut_bhatt"

> > <vidyut_Bhatt@h...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Hello Rohini Ranjan ji,

> > >

> > > Your answer has left me more confused.

> > > You have not written anything about praying which Planet/God

for

> > > Trikaal Gyana in Astrology.

> > >

> > > Can I request Tanveer ji or Sri Niraj ji to throw more light

on

> > this?

> > >

> > > Rgds,

> > > VB/HT

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , "rohiniranjan"

> > <rrgb@s...>

> > > wrote:

> > > > Unfortunately, this is true for other things in jyotish as

> well.

> > > > Different people will see the same results in different

> patterns

> > of

> > > > planets. It may be counterintuitive, because we all like to

> > think

> > > of

> > > > jyotish as a very rigid scientific discipline where 1+1 must

> =2.

> > > > However, unless much of the jyotish population is unmatta,

how

> > can

> > > > one explain the use of different ayanamshas, different

dashas

> or

> > > > rather different combinations of dashas and yet the outcomes

> are

> > > > reasonably comparable (in terms of success). Each camp or

> cohort

> > > may

> > > > think that they are the only one with the key and some

publicly

> > > > state so, but it is all very complex and anecdotal.

> > > >

> > > > Something like jyotish which describes and goes into all

facets

> > of

> > > > human experience could not possibly fit into one or two

planets

> > or

> > > > signs, etc. Even for something as technical as medicine or

> > > > engineering, there would not be one or few combinations or a

> > planet

> > > > that would be the be all, end all. How can the same be

expected

> > of

> > > > jyotish, which has so many different flavour and different

ways

> > of

> > > > thinking and deducing. It is quite possible that different

> > > jyotishis

> > > > will have different leanings and skews and while some may be

> > more

> > > > given to listening to innersource and japam etc., others

might

> > like

> > > > to approach the vidya in a more linear, fact-based manner.

> > Mercury

> > > > and mars may indicate one's comfort in a worldly, linear

> > framework,

> > > > jupiter may give scholarship and broad knowledge of the

field

> > and a

> > > > great ability to apply many different techniques in a

complex

> > > > framework and a leaning towards teaching astrology, ketu may

> > make

> > > > one more intuitive, rahu may make one focused more on

worldly

> > > > issues, sun may give a leaning for mundane or political

> > astrology,

> > > > saturn may bring to the fore someone who is somewhat

sceptical

> > and

> > > > needs that there be a very common sense approach, venus may

> > bring

> > > > into the field an organizer and researcher, and so on.

> > > >

> > > .com/offer