Pisces,.. Asc Women, Not Suitable !!??( for everyone)

[Guest guest]

To everyone:

 

We don't really know why the author of Hora Sara wrote this sloka as

such. However, it is worth remembering in making compatibility

assessments of couples. The assessment should include the comparison

for kuja dosha and the kuta points.

 

In my opinion, the rationale for the sloka could be as follows:

 

1. For females with Pisces lagnas, the 7th lord is Mercury which is

debilitated in the lagna itself.

 

2. For Sagittarius lagna, the 7th lord (Mercury) is debilitated in

the 4th house, the bhava signifying the home.

 

3. For Cancer lagna, the 7th lord (Saturn) is debilitated in the

10th house of careers.

 

Regards,

 

John R.

 

 

 

-- In , Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...>

wrote:

> Dear All,

>

> Please stop discussing such serious matter with such kind of logic.

There are very precise astrological star positions , aspects , fixed

stars responsible for these conditions like Homosexuality , Eunuch ,

Sexual aggressions , Infidelity and many such disorders. Fortunately

such cases are rare and Astrologically solvable but not the way in

which logic has been put.

>

>

> So my suggestion is that such matters should be discussed more

seriously and expressing one's views casually should be avoided.

>

> Regards,

>

> Anil

> -

> OM

>

> Tuesday, April 27, 2004 1:57 PM

> Pisces, Cancer and Saggi Asc Women, Not

Suitable !!??

>

>

> Well,

>

> the logic could be:

>

> Pisces->7th.house->Virgo->ruler->Mercury->gender->enuch

> Cancer->7th.house->Capri->ruler->Saturn->gender->enuch

> Saggi->7th.house->Gemini->ruler->Mercury->gender->enuch

>

> No man would want to be an eunuch, so avoid these females :)

>

> The only logic I could think of !!

>

> Regards

>

> Souvik

>

>

>

>

> , "parvatishankar"

> <parvatishankar> wrote:

> > Even people with severe mars dosha are allowed partners:)....or

is

> it

> > because traditionally people with pisces and cancer lagna would

be

> > perhaps a wee bit disturbed(women specially are prone towards

> > depression than men) being emotional signs...

> >

> > ...then where does saggi fit in and worse, what about scorpio,

> aries,

> > leo, wouldn't they be dubbed aggressive?

> >

> > ....perhaps, this rule is for certain ascendants...and not to

be

> > generalized?

> >

> > , "Deepak Nair"

> > <deepaknair@1...> wrote:

> > > Dear John,

> > >

> > > Does this imply that one fourth of the female community

should

> > remain

> > > unmarried ?

> > >

> > > That's a very disturbing thought ! I hope I am wrong.

> > >

> > > Deepak Nair

> > >

> > >

> > > John [danistha1@n...]

> > > Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:43 AM

> > >

> > > Compatibility Points

> > >

> > > To all listmembers,

> > >

> > > Hora Sara states that a man should refrain from marrying a

woman

> > > whose lagna rises either in Pisces, Cancer, or Sagittarius.

> > >

> > > Please, comment.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > >

> > > John R.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> > > Links

>

>

>

> ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

>

>

>

> --

----------

> Links

>

>

> /

>

> b..

>

>

> c.. Terms of

Service.

[Guest guest]

To everyone.

 

Marriage and compatibility is very complex subject and as such most

jyotish texts devote a nubmer of slokas to describe the subject. One

sloka can never suffice. My understanding is that it is always better

to consider all the slokas and judge the impact totally.

 

On a philosophical point. I believe that not all jyotish knowledge is

written down in the texts [some texts are explicit about this] and

the same must be augmented by experience and discipleship.

 

-Manish P. Jain

, "John" <danistha1@n...>

wrote:

> To everyone:

>

> We don't really know why the author of Hora Sara wrote this sloka

as

> such. However, it is worth remembering in making compatibility

> assessments of couples. The assessment should include the

comparison

> for kuja dosha and the kuta points.

>

> In my opinion, the rationale for the sloka could be as follows:

>

> 1. For females with Pisces lagnas, the 7th lord is Mercury which

is

> debilitated in the lagna itself.

>

> 2. For Sagittarius lagna, the 7th lord (Mercury) is debilitated in

> the 4th house, the bhava signifying the home.

>

> 3. For Cancer lagna, the 7th lord (Saturn) is debilitated in the

> 10th house of careers.

>

> Regards,

>

> John R.

>

>

>

> -- In , Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...>

> wrote:

> > Dear All,

> >

> > Please stop discussing such serious matter with such kind of

logic.

> There are very precise astrological star positions , aspects ,

fixed

> stars responsible for these conditions like Homosexuality ,

Eunuch ,

> Sexual aggressions , Infidelity and many such disorders.

Fortunately

> such cases are rare and Astrologically solvable but not the way in

> which logic has been put.

> >

> >

> > So my suggestion is that such matters should be discussed more

> seriously and expressing one's views casually should be avoided.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Anil

> > -

> > OM

> >

> > Tuesday, April 27, 2004 1:57 PM

> > Pisces, Cancer and Saggi Asc Women, Not

> Suitable !!??

> >

> >

> > Well,

> >

> > the logic could be:

> >

> > Pisces->7th.house->Virgo->ruler->Mercury->gender->enuch

> > Cancer->7th.house->Capri->ruler->Saturn->gender->enuch

> > Saggi->7th.house->Gemini->ruler->Mercury->gender->enuch

> >

> > No man would want to be an eunuch, so avoid these females :)

> >

> > The only logic I could think of !!

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Souvik

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , "parvatishankar"

> > <parvatishankar> wrote:

> > > Even people with severe mars dosha are allowed

partners:)....or

> is

> > it

> > > because traditionally people with pisces and cancer lagna

would

> be

> > > perhaps a wee bit disturbed(women specially are prone towards

> > > depression than men) being emotional signs...

> > >

> > > ...then where does saggi fit in and worse, what about

scorpio,

> > aries,

> > > leo, wouldn't they be dubbed aggressive?

> > >

> > > ....perhaps, this rule is for certain ascendants...and not to

> be

> > > generalized?

> > >

> > > , "Deepak Nair"

> > > <deepaknair@1...> wrote:

> > > > Dear John,

> > > >

> > > > Does this imply that one fourth of the female community

> should

> > > remain

> > > > unmarried ?

> > > >

> > > > That's a very disturbing thought ! I hope I am wrong.

> > > >

> > > > Deepak Nair

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > John [danistha1@n...]

> > > > Tuesday, April 27, 2004 5:43 AM

> > > >

> > > > Compatibility Points

> > > >

> > > > To all listmembers,

> > > >

> > > > Hora Sara states that a man should refrain from marrying a

> woman

> > > > whose lagna rises either in Pisces, Cancer, or Sagittarius.

> > > >

> > > > Please, comment.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > >

> > > > John R.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> > > > Links

> >

> >

> >

> > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~

> >

> >

> >

> >

--

> ----------

> > Links

> >

> >

> > /

> >

> > b..

> >

> >

> > c.. Terms

of

> Service.