How to manage relationships astrologically -

[Guest guest]

Dear Friends,

 

Could not resist sharing my views...a little off the track though.

 

There is a famous ancient Greek myth that asks,"What goes on four

legs in the morning, two at the afternoon , on three when evening

comes?"

 

We all know this fact, we all know that we have to pass through

these stages and we have to face the ultimate truth at the end, but

still we deny to see that truth , we crave to know what's in our

future and how much money are we going to make?:-)

In this short span of our lives there are just two of a few things

which matter the most---our HONESTY to ourselves and our

RELATIONSHIPS which we choose or are born with. We should nurture

our relatonships with faith and trust. I think we all have to face

the ultimate truth one day and this is the only life that we really

know we have, so cut off anything that takes away your peace of mind

and disturbs you but nurture those relationships which are genuine

and pure.

 

I hope I made sense.

 

Manoshi

 

, "OM" <explore_vulcan>

wrote:

> "Relationship"...is it between like minded people or complimentary

> individuals....A great and thoughtful topic.

>

> My views(on the Adibhautika plane, as very aptly put by Rajeev):

>

> 1. In a symbiotic society (mutually beneficial) we are

> in "relationship" with "like-minded" people. e.g. Mercurial ppl

> working in an IT firm. There "relationship" would be the one

shared

> between like-minded peers.

>

> 2. Given to the emotional side and to our choice, we often

> get "attracted" to ppl with characteristics that compliment ours.

> The Venus and sturn example given by Rajeev is apt here...

>

> This is my contribution towards "realtionships"...

>

> Regards,

>

> Souvik

>

>

> , Rajeev Tadepalli

> <Rajeev.Tadepalli@S...> wrote:

> > This was my first love to take up to Astrology.

> > To understand the mutual compatibility of people

> >

> > Personally, I feel this cannot be addressed in a single page or

a

> mail.

> > However am penning down my initial thoughts. If my thoughts find

> acceptance

> > with the group, we can proceed further on this subject with the

> valuable

> > contribution from other members.

> >

> > Scope of study

> >

> > Between any two individual's there can exist only 3 types of

> interactions at

> > a mundane level.

> >

> > Dimension of Psychology

> >

> > * Relationship (Very Subtle)

> > * Communication (Subtle)

> > * Behavior (Gross)

> >

> > Now interestingly there are 3 planes of relating, behaving or

> communicating

> > :-) :-)

> >

> > Dimension of Philosophy

> >

> > * AdiBhautika (Gross)

> > * AdiDaivaka (Subtler)

> > * Adhyatimika (Most Subtle)

> >

> > To add one more dimension to this there are only 3 ways in which

> any human

> > being can perform action.

> >

> > Dimension of Action (So to say)

> >

> > * Thought (The most subtle)

> > * Word (Subtler)

> > * Deed (Very Gross)

> >

> > Now we have 3 dimensions.

> >

> > Let us keep the situation simple by eliminating one dimension,

the

> dimension

> > of Action by mapping it to the dimension of Psychology.

> >

> > From now on for all practical purposes

> >

> > Relationship (Very Subtle) == Thought (The most

> subtle)

> > Communication (Subtle) == Word (Subtler)

> > Behavior (Gross) == Deed (Very

> Gross)

> > Before we delve into solving this problem, intriguing Surendra

> Lalwani,

> > Astrologically, we need to clearly define the scope of the

problem

> > definition.

> >

> > The entities involved and the spectrum of their variation.

> >

> > Finally we can identify all the possible solutions to extend our

> > understanding.

> >

> > Wait a minute, but what is the benefit of doing this exercise?

> >

> > Benefit of this study

> >

> > "Every individual is very uniquely molded from the cast of the

> divine

> > thought. Due to this uniqueness we are all different. At times

these

> > differences seem to be difficult to us"

> >

> > More precisely, PEOPLE ARE NOT DIFFICULT BUT ARE ONLY DIFFERENT.

> >

> > Due to these differences people may behave consciously or

> unconsciously in a

> > COMPLEMENTARY or a SUPPLEMTARY fashion.

> >

> > This supplementary way of BEHAVIOUR, THOUGHT & DEED are counter

> productive.

> >

> > SO UNDERSTANDING THESE DIFFERENCE AMONG OURSELVES MAKES US

> SYMPATHETIC TO

> > OUR FELLOW BEINGS AND HELPS US TO BE CONSIDERATE TO THEM.

> >

> > An Observation for case study

> >

> > All the Librans and Tauresan's are lazy. This is a very plain

> statement. I

> > have obtained this wisdom over a period of two years study and

> observation.

> >

> > For both these sign people being the astrological children of

> Venus, which

> > is by nature a lazy planet, inherit their parent's quality :-) :-

)

> >

> > In spite of themselves, they cannot help it. (This is true 80%

of

> the times)

> >

> > (Well, if some one find this contradictory there may be some

> nullifying

> > factors in the charts of people)

> >

> > Aquarians and Capricorns (Myself) are very diligent. This is one

> more plain

> > statement.

> >

> > For both these two sign's people being the astrological children

of

> Saturn,

> > which is by nature a very vigilant and diligent planet, inherit

> their

> > parent's quality :-) :-)

> >

> > Now, Irrespective of the relationship between individuals, Due

> diligence is

> > contradictory/different from laziness.

> >

> > How do we handle the situation of conflict without this wisdom

from

> > Astrology?

> > Contrarily, with this wisdom I, as an astrological child of

Saturn,

> feel

> > compassionate to the children of Venus.

> >

> > Before I conclude I want to share one personal observation.

> >

> > I found some response to Surendra Lalwani's postings.

> > These were trying to address this problem on a Adhyatmik plane.

> (or may be

> > at an intersection area of Adibhautika and Adhyatmika plane)

> > My approach is purely on a Adibhautika plane.

> >

> > For on an Adhyatmik plane, I bow down to Supreme Lord and Adi

Guru

> Sri

> > Dakshinamurti.

> > I have nothing to speak. We only have to adorn Mounam. (Silence

of

> Thought,

> > Speech & Action)

> >

> > Well, on this note I conclude.

> >

> > I request people to respond by contributing/sharing their pearls

of

> wisdom.

> >

> >

> > OM TAT SAT.