Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Dear Anil: There were no issues raised by me regarding anything. Please do not twist my posting. I gave you my views on 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th marriages as I see it. If we CHANGE OUR OURSELF and our UNDERSTANDING then there will be no quarrels and no DIVORCES. Cant we get the essence here? If you do not agree with those views, that is fine. But please do not twist my posting. I ask you to re-read it again and understand what i am trying to say. Also, the person who issued a big LOL, needs to explain what SHE MEANT? It is very rude behavior to display such patterns in public. Thanks and Kind Regards. --Sanjay Aggarwal , gogatea@v... wrote: > Dear Inder, > > I knew this site. Infact the parent site has superb discussions on fundamentals of Vedic astrology. I am giving below the link. > > http://www.bena.com/sherpa1/bpa/bAstrHom.htm > > However for beginners and learners , the basic difficulty is how to apply these principles to particular situations they come across in the horoscopes they study ? and there is no easy answer for that and everybody has to develop one's own methodology and approach for analysis and predictions. So these sites are useful as therotical guidelines but you have to form your own rules for practical analysis. > > Anyway it is a great site with rich information contents. Must visit for all the astrology lovers in this forum. > > Thanks > > Anil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Dear Sanjay Ji, Dont be sarcastic, come on. I meant nothing. Manoshi , "sanjaytechnology" <sanjaytechnology> wrote: > Dear Anil: > > There were no issues raised by me regarding anything. Please do not > twist my posting. I gave you my views on 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th > marriages as I see it. If we CHANGE OUR OURSELF and our > UNDERSTANDING then there will be no quarrels and no DIVORCES. Cant > we get the essence here? > > If you do not agree with those views, that is fine. But please do > not twist my posting. I ask you to re-read it again and understand > what i am trying to say. > > Also, the person who issued a big LOL, needs to explain what SHE > MEANT? It is very rude behavior to display such patterns in public. > > Thanks and Kind Regards. > > --Sanjay Aggarwal > > , gogatea@v... wrote: > > Dear Inder, > > > > I knew this site. Infact the parent site has superb discussions on > fundamentals of Vedic astrology. I am giving below the link. > > > > http://www.bena.com/sherpa1/bpa/bAstrHom.htm > > > > However for beginners and learners , the basic difficulty is how > to apply these principles to particular situations they come across > in the horoscopes they study ? and there is no easy answer for that > and everybody has to develop one's own methodology and approach for > analysis and predictions. So these sites are useful as therotical > guidelines but you have to form your own rules for practical > analysis. > > > > Anyway it is a great site with rich information contents. Must > visit for all the astrology lovers in this forum. > > > > Thanks > > > > Anil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Dear Sanjay, You got it wrong. My posting was not "provoked" or "instigated" by your posting. I did not even disagree with you. What all wanted to say was there is a different perspective to this complex issue. And based on experience wanted that I other members of the group could benefited from my way of thinking. All other issues like who is motivating whom etc are to be taken in lighter sense. Even LOL you should not take it literally - many people express their reaction that way. I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we could differ on our views expressed in postings, we also should show some sportsmanship and openness to accept unfavorable reactions and criticism. Regards, Anil - sanjaytechnology Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:16 AM Re: 2 MArriages: ??--> Anil Gogate Dear Anil:There were no issues raised by me regarding anything. Please do not twist my posting. I gave you my views on 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th marriages as I see it. If we CHANGE OUR OURSELF and our UNDERSTANDING then there will be no quarrels and no DIVORCES. Cant we get the essence here?If you do not agree with those views, that is fine. But please do not twist my posting. I ask you to re-read it again and understand what i am trying to say. Also, the person who issued a big LOL, needs to explain what SHE MEANT? It is very rude behavior to display such patterns in public. Thanks and Kind Regards.--Sanjay Aggarwal--- In , gogatea@v... wrote:> Dear Inder,> > I knew this site. Infact the parent site has superb discussions on fundamentals of Vedic astrology. I am giving below the link.> > http://www.bena.com/sherpa1/bpa/bAstrHom.htm> > However for beginners and learners , the basic difficulty is how to apply these principles to particular situations they come across in the horoscopes they study ? and there is no easy answer for that and everybody has to develop one's own methodology and approach for analysis and predictions. So these sites are useful as therotical guidelines but you have to form your own rules for practical analysis.> > Anyway it is a great site with rich information contents. Must visit for all the astrology lovers in this forum.> > Thanks> > Anil~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2004 Report Share Posted April 6, 2004 Dear Anil: You wrote: > I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we could differ on our >>views expressed in postings, we also should show some >>sportsmanship and openness to accept unfavorable reactions and criticism. -- There is a difference between constructive criticism and bringing people down to make oneself look better. Remember the story of shortening the LINE on the blackboard. To make it short we dont have to erase it. We have to make ours longer without any feeling of enmity towards the line or tryng to make it shorter. Just draw a bigger LINE. Big Difference!!! You wrote earlier: -- >>have shortage of such examples. But the objective of the mail was to >>put across my viewpoint on issues raised by Sanjay. What issues did I raise? My posting was completely benign and general. I was just stunned at the way you and Manoshi were reacting. Just stunned. Thanks for clarifying. Also, it is important that we defend ourselves. If we always bear other people's violence then these people will always be violent. Let us all remember, that the greatest virtue, the highest action, and the best form of worship is to look upon other people with the AWARENESS that the SELF is in ALL. If we have great RESPECT for our own SELF, we have great respect for others. Thanks for clarifying. That eases the atmosphere. I rest my case. Warm Regards. --Sanjay Aggarwal , Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...> wrote: > Dear Sanjay, > > You got it wrong. My posting was not "provoked" or "instigated" by your posting. I did not even disagree with you. What all wanted to say was there is a different perspective to this complex issue. And based on experience wanted that I other members of the group could benefited from my way of thinking. > > All other issues like who is motivating whom etc are to be taken in lighter sense. Even LOL you should not take it literally - many people express their reaction that way. > > I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we could differ on our views expressed in postings, we also should show some sportsmanship and openness to accept unfavorable reactions and criticism. > > Regards, > > Anil > - > sanjaytechnology > > Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:16 AM > Re: 2 MArriages: ??--> Anil Gogate > > > Dear Anil: > > There were no issues raised by me regarding anything. Please do not > twist my posting. I gave you my views on 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th > marriages as I see it. If we CHANGE OUR OURSELF and our > UNDERSTANDING then there will be no quarrels and no DIVORCES. Cant > we get the essence here? > > If you do not agree with those views, that is fine. But please do > not twist my posting. I ask you to re-read it again and understand > what i am trying to say. > > Also, the person who issued a big LOL, needs to explain what SHE > MEANT? It is very rude behavior to display such patterns in public. > > Thanks and Kind Regards. > > --Sanjay Aggarwal > > , gogatea@v... wrote: > > Dear Inder, > > > > I knew this site. Infact the parent site has superb discussions on > fundamentals of Vedic astrology. I am giving below the link. > > > > http://www.bena.com/sherpa1/bpa/bAstrHom.htm > > > > However for beginners and learners , the basic difficulty is how > to apply these principles to particular situations they come across > in the horoscopes they study ? and there is no easy answer for that > and everybody has to develop one's own methodology and approach for > analysis and predictions. So these sites are useful as therotical > guidelines but you have to form your own rules for practical > analysis. > > > > Anyway it is a great site with rich information contents. Must > visit for all the astrology lovers in this forum. > > > > Thanks > > > > Anil > > > > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~ > > > > - ----------- > Links > > > / > > b.. > > > c.. Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 7, 2004 Report Share Posted April 7, 2004 Dear Sanjay, This is my last posting on this subject. If I spend so much time on this subject, I myself may be forced to take divorce and think of remarriage because I am not doing any household work last few days as I am busy in writing and answering posts on remarriage ! Jokes apart, but I will just like to remind you what you said. I quote If one seperates, one will want to remarry, and once again one will have the same problems.All wives and all husbands are the same, so dont change your husband or your wife. Change your nature. Then everything will be alright :-). Unquote I found your statement grossly unacceptable astrologically and otherwise also. I have still not understood your perspective in saying "All wives and all Husbands are the same" and hence there were reactions. Forget about me , I do not think any of the forum members also would agree to what you have said and some of them reacted. Anyway, I have stopped discussions from my side on this. However we have many other topics to debate , discuss , agree or disagree so let us think of those topics. Regards, Anil - sanjaytechnology Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:37 AM Re: 2 MArriages: ??--> Anil Gogate Dear Anil:You wrote:> I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we could differ on our >>views expressed in postings, we also should show some >>sportsmanship and openness to accept unfavorable reactions and criticism.--There is a difference between constructive criticism and bringing people down to make oneself look better. Remember the story of shortening the LINE on the blackboard. To make it short we dont have to erase it. We have to make ours longer without any feeling of enmity towards the line or tryng to make it shorter. Just draw a bigger LINE.Big Difference!!!You wrote earlier:-->>have shortage of such examples. But the objective of the mail was to>>put across my viewpoint on issues raised by Sanjay.What issues did I raise?My posting was completely benign and general. I was just stunned at the way you and Manoshi were reacting. Just stunned. Thanks for clarifying.Also, it is important that we defend ourselves. If we always bear other people's violence then these people will always be violent.Let us all remember, that the greatest virtue, the highest action, and the best form of worship is to look upon other people with the AWARENESS that the SELF is in ALL. If we have great RESPECT for our own SELF, we have great respect for others.Thanks for clarifying. That eases the atmosphere. I rest my case. Warm Regards.--Sanjay Aggarwal--- In , Anil VSNL <gogatea@v...> wrote:> Dear Sanjay,> > You got it wrong. My posting was not "provoked" or "instigated" by your posting. I did not even disagree with you. What all wanted to say was there is a different perspective to this complex issue. And based on experience wanted that I other members of the group could benefited from my way of thinking.> > All other issues like who is motivating whom etc are to be taken in lighter sense. Even LOL you should not take it literally - many people express their reaction that way.> > I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we could differ on our views expressed in postings, we also should show some sportsmanship and openness to accept unfavorable reactions and criticism.> > Regards,> > Anil> - > sanjaytechnology > > Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:16 AM> Re: 2 MArriages: ??--> Anil Gogate> > > Dear Anil:> > There were no issues raised by me regarding anything. Please do not > twist my posting. I gave you my views on 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th > marriages as I see it. If we CHANGE OUR OURSELF and our > UNDERSTANDING then there will be no quarrels and no DIVORCES. Cant > we get the essence here?> > If you do not agree with those views, that is fine. But please do > not twist my posting. I ask you to re-read it again and understand > what i am trying to say. > > Also, the person who issued a big LOL, needs to explain what SHE > MEANT? It is very rude behavior to display such patterns in public. > > Thanks and Kind Regards.> > --Sanjay Aggarwal> > , gogatea@v... wrote:> > Dear Inder,> > > > I knew this site. Infact the parent site has superb discussions on > fundamentals of Vedic astrology. I am giving below the link.> > > > http://www.bena.com/sherpa1/bpa/bAstrHom.htm> > > > However for beginners and learners , the basic difficulty is how > to apply these principles to particular situations they come across > in the horoscopes they study ? and there is no easy answer for that > and everybody has to develop one's own methodology and approach for > analysis and predictions. So these sites are useful as therotical > guidelines but you have to form your own rules for practical > analysis.> > > > Anyway it is a great site with rich information contents. Must > visit for all the astrology lovers in this forum.> > > > Thanks> > > > Anil> > > > ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~ > > > > > Links> > > /> > b.. To from this group, send an email to:> > > c.. Your use of is subject to the ~! LIFE MEANS STRUGGLE, THE FITTEST WINS SURVIVAL !~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2004 Report Share Posted April 8, 2004 Friends if it was so easy to change our nature then there would not be unplesantness this discussion in the first place (forget marriages or wars) ... for hazar reasons people all around the world cant even start thinking of changing simple things forget self !!! ... everything has right time to get started ... I think we should remember that the fact that there are planets that cause disharmony (in tantra there are dieties to cause calamities !!) indicates that the universe was not built to breed harmony although that might be the starting point and also the ending point Isnt it simple ... No one in this discussion meant anything bad to begin with ... however "percieved reality" led to some minor irritations ... I guess that's what happens in divorces too sometimes ... to that extent all wives and husbands are same ... for all other purposes people are like thumb prints .. maybe similar in some strokes but totally different in the overall picture !! Anil ... I was hoping you would share your research on this issue !!! Sanjay ... bad experiences in life have taught me that when we start to order chaos .. sometimes we become a part of it !! ... life is like that Cheers to all the people here !! Surya. --- Anil VSNL <gogatea wrote: > Dear Sanjay, > > This is my last posting on this subject. If I spend > so much time on this subject, I myself may be forced > to take divorce and think of remarriage because I > am not doing any household work last few days as I > am busy in writing and answering posts on remarriage > ! Jokes apart, but I will just like to remind you > what you said. > > I quote > > If one seperates, one will want to remarry, and once > again one will > have the same problems.All wives and all husbands > are the same, so > dont change your husband or your wife. Change your > nature. Then > everything will be alright :-). > > Unquote > > I found your statement grossly unacceptable > astrologically and otherwise also. I have still not > understood your perspective in saying "All wives and > all Husbands are the same" and hence there were > reactions. Forget about me , I do not think any of > the forum members also would agree to what you have > said and some of them reacted. > > Anyway, I have stopped discussions from my side on > this. However we have many other topics to debate , > discuss , agree or disagree so let us think of those > topics. > > > Regards, > > Anil > - > sanjaytechnology > > Wednesday, April 07, 2004 8:37 AM > Re: 2 MArriages: ??--> Anil Gogate > > > Dear Anil: > > You wrote: > > > I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we > could differ on our > >>views expressed in postings, we also should show > some > >>sportsmanship and openness to accept unfavorable > reactions and > criticism. > > -- > > > There is a difference between constructive > criticism and bringing > people down to make oneself look better. Remember > the story of > shortening the LINE on the blackboard. To make it > short we dont have > to erase it. We have to make ours longer without > any feeling of > enmity towards the line or tryng to make it > shorter. Just draw a > bigger LINE. > > Big Difference!!! > > You wrote earlier: > > -- > > >>have shortage of such examples. But the > objective of the mail was > to > >>put across my viewpoint on issues raised by > Sanjay. > > What issues did I raise? > > My posting was completely benign and general. I > was just stunned at > the way you and Manoshi were reacting. Just > stunned. Thanks for > clarifying. > > Also, it is important that we defend ourselves. If > we always bear > other people's violence then these people will > always be violent. > > Let us all remember, that the greatest virtue, the > highest action, > and the best form of worship is to look upon other > people with the > AWARENESS that the SELF is in ALL. If we have > great RESPECT for our > own SELF, we have great respect for others. > > Thanks for clarifying. That eases the atmosphere. > > I rest my case. > > Warm Regards. > > --Sanjay Aggarwal > > > , Anil VSNL > <gogatea@v...> > wrote: > > Dear Sanjay, > > > > You got it wrong. My posting was not "provoked" > or "instigated" by > your posting. I did not even disagree with you. > What all wanted to > say was there is a different perspective to this > complex issue. And > based on experience wanted that I other members of > the group could > benefited from my way of thinking. > > > > All other issues like who is motivating whom etc > are to be taken > in lighter sense. Even LOL you should not take it > literally - many > people express their reaction that way. > > > > I hope about clarifies the doubt and while we > could differ on our > views expressed in postings, we also should show > some sportsmanship > and openness to accept unfavorable reactions and > criticism. > > > > Regards, > > > > Anil > > - > > sanjaytechnology > > > > Wednesday, April 07, 2004 1:16 AM > > Re: 2 MArriages: ??--> Anil > Gogate > > > > > > Dear Anil: > > > > There were no issues raised by me regarding > anything. Please do > not > > twist my posting. I gave you my views on 2nd, > 3rd, 4th and 5th > > marriages as I see it. If we CHANGE OUR > OURSELF and our > > UNDERSTANDING then there will be no quarrels > and no DIVORCES. > Cant > > we get the essence here? > > > > If you do not agree with those views, that is > fine. But please > do > > not twist my posting. I ask you to re-read it > again and > understand > > what i am trying to say. > > > > Also, the person who issued a big LOL, needs > to explain what SHE > > MEANT? It is very rude behavior to display > such patterns in > public. > > > > Thanks and Kind Regards. > > > > --Sanjay Aggarwal > > > > , > gogatea@v... wrote: > > > Dear Inder, > > > > > > I knew this site. Infact the parent site has > superb > discussions on > > fundamentals of Vedic astrology. I am giving > below the link. > > > > > > http://www.bena.com/sherpa1/bpa/bAstrHom.htm > > > > > > However for beginners and learners , the > basic difficulty is > how > === message truncated === Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions./design_giveaway/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.